Ceruchus niger Boucher & Kral 1997
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.277719 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6190757 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/747487ED-FFBE-CE3C-9EAA-FC426CD7FE76 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Ceruchus niger Boucher & Kral 1997 |
status |
|
4. Ceruchus niger Boucher & Kral 1997 View in CoL
( Figs. 17–18 View FIGURES 10 – 24 , 27 View FIGURES 25 – 28 , 37–39 View FIGURES 29 – 45 , 49 View FIGURES 46 – 53 , 60, 65 View FIGURES 54 – 67 , 162–193 View FIGURES 162 – 169 View FIGURES 170 – 177 View FIGURES 178 – 185 View FIGURES 186 – 193 , 215–218 View FIGURES 210 – 224 , 229 View FIGURE 229 , 240, 243–248 View FIGURES 233 – 248 , 254 View FIGURES 249 – 258 , 264–267 View FIGURES 259 – 273 , 284–287 View FIGURES 274 – 292 )
Specimens examined. CHINA: Yunnan Province: 83 & 6ƤƤ (CCCC), Lijiang, Laojunshan, 3500m, 13.VI.2009, C.-H. Shan & X.-Y. Zhu leg.; 23 & 1Ƥ (CHH), Lijiang, Yunlong-xueshan, Yunshanping, 3200m, 31.X.2007, B. Liu leg.; 13 (CHH), North Weixi, 3000m, 2.VI.2006, A.-M. Chen leg.; 23 & 1Ƥ (CYI), 14km east of Weixi, 3400m, 5.X.2005, Y. Imura & Y. Nagahata leg.; 13 & 1Ƥ (CHH), Dali City, Binchuan County, Jizushan, 2500m, 17.VII.2010, X.-B. Song leg.; Sichuan Province: 13 & 1Ƥ (CCCC), Muli City, Muli County, Xi-qiu-yakou Pass, 16.VIII.2008, W.-X. Lin leg. (63 & 3ƤƤ from different localities dissected).
Identification. The following male characters were described or illustrated in the original description ( Boucher & Kral 1997): 1) dorsal tooth of the mandible in lateral view with anterior margin and posterior margin nearly equally concave, causing tip of the tooth to not point forwards at all; 2) ventral tooth of the mandible in lateral view (for large and medium-sized males only) present; 3) anterior margin of the mentum noticeably protruding medially; 4) yellow setae on posterior half of the mesofemur in ventral view sparse and moderately long; 5) yellow setae on inner apex of the mesotibia short, narrowly distributed, dense and forming a thin brush; 6) caudal end of the penis not beyond the paramere in natural shape; 7) central split on caudal margin of the basal piece of the aedeagus in ventral view minute, with two sides protruding posteriorly, forming an m-shaped caudal margin; 8) endophallus narrow and short, not longer than half of the penis; 9) penis in ventral view medium in width, wider than in Ceruchus katerinae and Ceruchus deuvei but thinner than in Ceruchus sinensis and Ceruchus minor ; 10) penis in ventral view noticeably swollen in middle; 11) dorsal surface of the penis in lateral view slightly incurved, without wings along the margins. All the specimens examined matched with all these characters.
Only three useful female characters were found using the original description and Araya’s (2002) photographs of the female paratype: 1) anterior angle of the pronotum not an acute angle; 2) flattened marginal area of the pronotum relatively narrower than in Ceruchus minor ; 3) pronotum with a pair of the isolated protuberances outside of the transversal carina. Several female specimens examined were collected together with males from within the same dead trunks at three localities (Laojunshan, Yunshanping, and Muli). They share all the three above-mentioned characters with the female paratype.
Taxonomic notes. The species with the most characters in common with Ceruchus niger are Ceruchus yangi and Ceruchus reginae . Ceruchus yangi possesses nine different characters (one in the male genitalia and four in the female genitalia) from Ceruchus niger .
Male characters li l m d k y r n s t Dorsal tooth of mandible in larger males with both anterior and posterior margins ?? * * nearly equally concave in lateral view
Dorsal tooth of mandible in larger males with anterior margin more concave than? *? * * * * posterior margin in lateral view
Dorsal tooth of mandible in larger males with anterior margin convex *??
Ventral tooth of mandible more or less marked in lateral view * * * * * * * Ventral tooth of mandible entirely absent in lateral view * * * Setae widely distributed and relatively sparse on antennomeres 8–10 * * *? *? * * * Setae hardly seen at base of antennomeres 8 and 9 and relatively dense? *? Anterior margin of mentum noticeably protruding medially * * * Anterior margin of mentum flat or slightly concave or gently convex * * * * * * * Lateral margins of the mentum parallel *? *
Lateral margins of the mentum more or less convergent posteriorly * *? * * * * * Mentum rather smooth, only with a few punctures? *? Mentum coarsely punctate and irregularly sculptured in central part * * *? *? * * * Emargination on anterior margin of head in larger males shallow *?? Emargination on anterior margin of head in larger males a little deep * *? *? * * * Emargination on anterior margin of head in larger males deep? *? Depression on vertex of head extended towards posterior margin of head? *? Depression on vertex of head restricted to anterior half of head and shallow? *? * Depression on vertex of head restricted to anterior half of head and deep * *?? * * Depression on vertex of head nearly absent *
Dorsal surface of head in lateral view strongly convex in larger males *? *?
Dorsal surface of head in lateral view slightly convex in larger males ?? * * * * * Dorsal surface of head in lateral view nearly straight in larger males ?? *
Pronotum markedly wider than head *
Pronotum slightly wider than head * * * * * * * * * Lateral margins of pronotum strongly convex *
Lateral margins of pronotum straight or weakly convex * * * * * * * * * Two pairs of depressions on pronotum clearly marked * * * * * * * * Two pairs of depressions on pronotum obscure or obsolete * * * Depressed longitudinal striations on elytra relatively deep * * * * * * * Depressed longitudinal striations on elytra relatively shallow * * * Second apical tooth of protibia noticeably longer than half width of protibia, sometimes * * * * * equaling width of protibia
Second apical tooth of protibia not longer than half width of protibia * * * * * * * Yellow setae on posterior half of mesofemur dense and long * * * Yellow setae on posterior half of mesofemur dense and short * * * Yellow setae on posterior half of mesofemur sparse and short * * * * Male characters li l m d k y r n s t Yellow setae on inner apex of mesotibia forming a broad brush of long setae along inner * * * margin
Yellow setae on inner apex of mesotibia forming a broad brush of short setae along *
inner margin
Yellow setae on inner apex of mesotibia forming a thin brush of short setae along inner * * * * margin
Yellow setae on inner apex of mesotibia forming a small tuft of short setae confined to * terminal end
Yellow setae on inner apex of mesotibia very sparse, not forming a brush or tuft * Caudal end of penis noticeably protruding beyond parameres in natural shape? *? Caudal end of penis slightly protruding beyond parameres in natural shape *? * *? Caudal end of penis not protruding beyond parameres in natural shape? * * * *? Central split on caudal margin of basal piece of aedeagus in ventral view wide and *
deep, forming a large V-shaped gap
Central split on caudal margin of basal piece of aedeagus in ventral view narrow and * * shallow, forming a small Y-shaped gap, with two sides flat and not protruding
Central split on caudal margin of basal piece of aedeagus in ventral view minute, with * * * two sides protruding posteriorly, forming an m-shaped caudal margin
Central split on caudal margin of basal piece of aedeagus in ventral view minute or * * * * obsolete, with two sides flat and not protruding posteriorly
Caudal margin of paramere strongly depressed inwards just after dorsal caudal corner, ?? * * forming a fold that is visible in dorsal view
Caudal margin of paramere not forming a fold * * *? * *? * Inner sclerite near dorsal margin of paramere well developed ?? *?? Inner sclerite near dorsal margin of paramere weakly developed or obsolete *? *? *? * *? Endophallus wide and long, nearly as long as penis *?? Endophallus narrow and short, not longer than half of penis? * * * * * * *? Penis in ventral view markedly wide * * * * Penis in ventral view slightly wide * * * * Penis in ventral view thin * * Penis in ventral view swollen in middle and narrowed to both ends * * * Penis in ventral view swollen near cephalic end and narrowed to caudal end * * * Penis in ventral view even in width or evenly narrowed from cephalic end to caudal end * * * * Caudal end of penis in ventral view more or less with lateral shoulders * * * * Caudal end of penis in ventral view without lateral shoulders * * * * * * Penis in lateral view relatively wide * *?? Penis in lateral view relatively thin *? * *? * * * Dorsal surface of penis in lateral view slightly incurved, without wings along margin * *? * *? * * * Dorsal surface of penis in lateral view strongly incurved at cephalic half, with marked *?? wings along margin
Female characters li l m d k y r n s t Inner mola of mandible without clear central tooth *?
Inner mola of mandible with single central tooth * * * *? * * * Inner mola of mandible with double central teeth *?
Mentum longer and less transverse *?
Mentum shorter and more transverse * * * * *? * * * Pronotum hardly transverse *?
Pronotum slightly transverse * * * *? * * * Pronotum markedly transverse *?
Flattened marginal area of pronotum relatively wide *?
Flattened marginal area of pronotum relatively narrow * * * * *? * * * Transversal carina on pronotum obsolete or absent *?
Transversal carina on pronotum conspicuous and usually interrupted at sides * * * * *? * * * Pronotum with lateral protuberances outside of transversal carina * *? * * * Pronotum with lateral pairs of depressions outside of transversal carina *
Pronotum smooth outside of transversal carina * * *?
Depressed longitudinal striations on elytra relatively deep * * * * *? *
Depressed longitudinal striations on elytra relatively shallow *? * * Sclerotized part of hemisternite with the inner lateral margin relatively long * *? * * * Sclerotized part of hemisternite with the inner lateral margin relatively short * * * *?
Stylus nearly three times as long as wide *?
Stylus nearly twice as long as wide *?
Stylus nearly as long as wide, with outer lateral corner weakly protruding * * *?
Stylus nearly as long as wide, with outer lateral corner noticeably protruding *? * * * Bursa copulatrix extended well beyond its connection with accessory gland *??? Bursa copulatrix hardly beyond its connection with accessory gland? * * * *? * *? Spermathecal duct not longer than width of hemisternite *? * * *? * *? Spermathecal duct markedly longer than width of hemisternite? *?? Entrance of spermatheca sclerotized? *?? Entrance of spermatheca not sclerotized *? * * *? * *? Spermatheca (straightened) much longer than stylus *? * *? *? Spermatheca (straightened) nearly as long as stylus? * *? *? Spermathecal gland nearly as long as spermatheca? *? *? Spermathecal gland nearly 1.5 – 2.0 times as long as spermatheca? * * *? *? Spermathecal gland more than twice as long as spermatheca *? *?? Spermatheca nearly as wide as hemisternite *?? * *? Spermatheca markedly thinner than hemisternite? * * * *??
Distribution and geographical variation ( Fig. 293 View FIGURE 293 ). This species was described from Zhongdian (type locality), Lijiang and Deqin areas of northwest Yunnan, and was subsequently recorded from south Sichuan ( Araya 2002) and Weixi area of Yunnan ( Imura & Araya 2006). The specimens from the Weixi area examined by Imura & Araya (2006) were said to be somewhat different from “the topotypical specimens” “in having constantly developed apical inner tooth of the male mandibles and differently shaped pronotum with the lateral sides slightly but markedly convergent towards the front angles, which are a little more sharply pointed at the apices”. However, a male from Lijiang ( Fig. 246 View FIGURES 233 – 248 ) examined had a more developed apical inner tooth of the mandible than a male from Weixi ( Fig. 247 View FIGURES 233 – 248 ). The shape of the pronotum does not vary by locality.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
SuperFamily |
Scarabaeoidea |
Family |
|
Genus |