Tobochares fusus, Girón & Short, 2021
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1019.59881 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:740EFFB9-3ADA-4B2A-BD23-A839AAE71FB2 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6675298C-0C44-4D7A-9C50-29E620DEC24D |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:6675298C-0C44-4D7A-9C50-29E620DEC24D |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Tobochares fusus |
status |
sp. nov. |
Tobochares fusus View in CoL sp. nov. Figs 2C View Figure 2 , 5D-F View Figure 5 , 11C View Figure 11 , 14F View Figure 14 , 17 View Figure 17
Type material examined.
Holotype (male): "Brazil: Amapá: Oiapoque/ 3.85039, -51.81683; 17 m/ Oiapoque (ca. 1 km E); 18.vii.2018/leg. Short; Flotation of detritus/ex forest seep; BR18-0718-03C" (INPA). Paratypes (58 exs.): Brazil: Amapá: Same data as holotype (45, INPA, MNHN, SCC, SEMC including DNA voucher SLE1564); Oiapoque (4 km NE), 3.87234, -51.80315, 14 m, 18.vii.2018, leg. Short, root mats on rock at margin seep, BR18-0718-02A (10, INPA, SEMC); Oiapoque (ca. 5.5 km NE), Balneario, 18.vii.2018, leg. Short, margin of larger stream, BR18-0718-01C (1, SEMC). French Guiana: Savane Roche Virginie, near RN 2, 4.1883, -52.13982, 64 m, 10.iii.2020, leg. Short and Neff, rotting Clusia fruits, FG20-0310-01D (3, SEMC including DNA Voucher SLE2171).
Differential diagnosis.
Tobochares fusus is externally indistinguishable from T. emarginatus , given that both species share the same disposition and degree of impression of the elytral punctures, and a low transverse ridge on the posterior elevation of the metaventrite. However, they can be clearly differentiated by the general shape of the aedeagus, which is rather slender and nearly parallel sided in T. emarginatus ( Kohlenberg and Short 2017: fig. 14I), whereas T. fusus has a fusiform aedeagus (see Fig. 11C View Figure 11 ).
Description.
Size and form: Body length 1.7-2.0 mm. Body elongate oval, moderately convex (Fig. 5D, E View Figure 5 ). Color and punctation: Dorsal surfaces of body dark brown, with slightly paler pronotum (Fig. 5D View Figure 5 ); antennae, mouthparts, and legs yellowish brown, with orange tibiae; ventral surfaces of meso-, metathorax and abdomen dark brown (Fig. 5F View Figure 5 ). Ground punctation on head, pronotum and elytra moderately marked. Head: Eyes in dorsal view with anterior margin oblique, posteriorly directed; Tobochares canthus emarginating eye to about a quarter of its dorsal width in lateral view (Fig. 2C View Figure 2 ). Maxillary palps 0.7 × width of head. Thorax: Elytra with all kinds of punctures similar in size and degree of impression, seemingly evenly distributed, not forming grooves (Fig. 5D View Figure 5 ). Elevation of mesoventrite forming a low transverse ridge (Fig. 5F View Figure 5 ). Metaventrite with distinct median, broad, diamond-shaped glabrous area extending along posterior two thirds (Fig. 5F View Figure 5 ). Abdomen: Abdominal ventrites uniformly and densely pubescent (Fig. 5F View Figure 5 ). Aedeagus (Fig. 11C View Figure 11 ). Basal piece nearly 0.4 × length of a paramere; greatest width of a paramere nearly 0.7 × greatest width of median lobe; outer margins of parameres diverging along basal half, then broadly bending inward and tapering along apical fifth; apex of paramere oblique, pointing towards longitudinal midline of aedeagus; median lobe roughly triangular, apically rounded; gonopore situated at apex of median lobe.
Etymology.
Named with the Latin word Tobochares fusus , meaning fusiform, in reference to the shape of the aedeagus of this species.
Distribution.
This species is known from two closely situated localities on either side of the Oiapoque River, the boundary between French Guiana and the Brazilian state of Amapá. See Fig. 13 View Figure 13 .
Life history.
The series from Brazil were taken from a seepage habitat in a forested riparian corridor (Fig. 14F View Figure 14 ). A thin layer of saturated dead leaves was laying over granite, over which a thin film of water was seeping into an adjacent stream. The short series from French Guiana was collected from the rotting fruits of a Clusia on an otherwise dry forest floor and not adjacent to any aquatic habitat (Fig. 17C View Figure 17 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Acidocerinae |
Genus |