Motaga mengyangensis Wang & Song, 2024
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.3897/zookeys.1204.122042 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C881A211-879C-438A-9B89-27A4698492E1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11448227 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F4C1D37F-9AA3-4108-B407-937E4BCC7DBF |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:F4C1D37F-9AA3-4108-B407-937E4BCC7DBF |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Motaga mengyangensis Wang & Song |
status |
sp. nov. |
Motaga mengyangensis Wang & Song sp. nov.
Figs 13–16 View Figures 13–16 , 17–24 View Figures 17–24
Diagnosis.
The new species can be distinguished from other species by the aedeagal shaft bifurcated at apex, crab claw-like, with one pair ½ length of aedeagal shaft basal processes; pygofer dorsal appendage expanded at base and tapering towards apex; subgenital plate with row of four macrosetae medially on outer surface; connective with central lobe broad and stem well developed.
Description.
Body brown (Figs 13 View Figures 13–16 , 16 View Figures 13–16 ). Head slightly narrower than pronotum (Fig. 15 View Figures 13–16 ). Crown fore margin strongly produced, with two irregular, medial, amber-colored patches (Figs 13 View Figures 13–16 , 15 View Figures 13–16 ). Anterior part of pronotum light brown; posterior margin slightly darkened, with one nearly V-shaped, milky-white stripe. Coronal suture well developed. Eyes black (Figs 13 View Figures 13–16 , 14 View Figures 13–16 ). Mesonotum brown. Forewing grayish brown (Fig. 14 View Figures 13–16 ).
Male abdominal apodemes broad, extending to anterior margin of 4 th sternite (Fig. 24 View Figures 17–24 ).
Male genitalia. Pygofer lobe broad, with numerous microtrichia scattered along caudal edge and dorsal margin (Fig. 21 View Figures 17–24 ). Dorsal pygofer appendage with wide base and sharp apex (Fig. 22 View Figures 17–24 ). Subgenital plate with a row of four macrosetae in middle and with marginal peg-like setae from subbase to apex forming continuous row (Fig. 20 View Figures 17–24 ). Style long and slender (Fig. 17 View Figures 17–24 ). Connective with lateral arms strong, central lobe broad and stem well developed (Fig. 23 View Figures 17–24 ). Aedeagal shaft long, straight in ventral view, curved dorsad in lateral view, bifurcated at apex; crab claw-like and with pair of basal long processes; gonopore located at 1 / 2 height of aedeagal shaft, ventrad (Figs 18 View Figures 17–24 , 19 View Figures 17–24 ).
Specimens examined.
Holotype: ♂; China, Yunnan Prov., Jinghong City, Mnegyang Town ; 2 August 2021; Tianyi Pu leg.; GZNU -2021-YN-JH-6-001 . Paratypes: 41 ♂♂, 58 ♀♀, same data as holotype; GZNU -2021-YN-JH-6-002 to 100 .
Measurements.
Male length 2.3–2.4 mm, female length 2.4–2.5 mm (including wings).
Remarks.
This species is very similar to Motaga fara Dworakowska, 1980 , but it differs from M. fara in having the dorsal pygofer process with a stouter base, the length of the aedeagal shaft proportionally longer compared to the basal processes, and the gonopore located at about halfway along the length of the aedeagal shaft.
Etymology.
The new species is named after its type locality, Mengyang Town.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |