Pilophorus Hahn
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3795.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0274FCF1-9EEF-4782-A5CA-F92113CAF1C8 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6131216 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/73608791-FFE2-FFC5-BBC4-FE6D8141FA26 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Pilophorus Hahn |
status |
|
Genus Pilophorus Hahn View in CoL
Diagnosis. Primarily recognized by more or less myrmecomorphic, elongate and always macropterous body form; partly aggregated scalelike setae on scutellum; presence of anterior band of scalelike setae on corium (a posterior band variable, sometimes interrupted or scattered); weakly or moderately flattened metatibia; fleshy, recurved, apically convergent parempodia; usually strongly sprayed-out left paramere; ovoid to elongate oval right paramere; and C- to J-shaped (but rarely nearly straight) endosoma often furnished with a median spine, flagellum or barb. Some species strikingly ant-like because of strong modifications of the pronotum that is conspicuously tightened, constricted, or horned ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 ). Schuh (1984, 1991), Schuh & Schwartz (1988) and Yasunaga & Schuh (2013) provided further diagnostic characters and synapomorphies.
Distribution. Holarctic, Oriental and Afrotropical regions, New Guinea, and some Pacific islands.
Biology. Most members of Pilophorus appear to be host plant specific, and the host plants range from forbs, broadleaf woody angiosperms to conifers, but the genus is also assumed to comprise predators, preying on other arthropods ( Wheeler, 2001; Yasunaga, 2001; Yasunaga & Schuh, 2013). In Japan, P. t y pi cu s (Distant) and its closely related congeners are regarded to be potential candidates as indigenous natural enemies for biological control programs ( Ito et al., 2011; Yasunaga, 2001). Both adults and immature forms are often observed to co-occur with the workers of various ants.
Discussion. Most members of Pilophorus are assumed to have strong relationships to certain ant species ( Nakatani et al., 2013; Yasunaga & Schuh, 2013), and quite a few undescribed species exist particularly in the subtropical and tropical Old World. There are at least three undetermined or undescribed species (now represented only by females, as in Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 H) present in Thailand. We refrain from describing such species until male specimens are available.
Pilophorus View in CoL comprises morphologically very diverse species; some members are strikingly antlike ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 ) because of conspicuous modification of the pronota, and P. portentosus , which has the excessively long antennae and legs ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 H), resembles wasp rather than ant ( Yasunaga & Schuh, 2013). On the other hand, Nakatani et al. (2013) reported seven unique species that are predominantly associated with Macaranga View in CoL trees ( Euphorbiaceae View in CoL ) in Malaysia; these members uniquely have the strongly protruded scutella. In spite of such great interspecific variation exhibited in some special members, the monophyly of the genus may be supported by the recent phylogenetic analyses based on both morphology and DNA sequence data ( Schuh & Menard, 2011; 2013).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.