Leitoscoloplos cf. abranchiatus (Hartman, 1967a)
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1020.57921 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:CC23B8CE-8C8E-473C-BD8C-44E74252A33D |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/73240810-0AB7-7E21-DD1D-E76B5D64FF79 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Leitoscoloplos cf. abranchiatus (Hartman, 1967a) |
status |
|
Leitoscoloplos cf. abranchiatus (Hartman, 1967a) View in CoL Fig. 18B View Figure 18
Diagnosis.
All specimens incomplete posteriorly. Longest fragment ~ 15 mm long, 1.3 mm wide, consisting of 41 chaetigerous segments. Thorax slightly flattened, abdomen cylindrical. Prostomium conical; one peristomial ring. Eleven thoracic chaetigers. Abdominal parapodia lateral in anterior abdomen, shifted dorsally on posteriorward segments. Branchiae from chaetiger 24, first short triangle, then becoming longer, strap-like. Thoracic postchaetal lobes conical in both rami; short in anterior thorax, becoming longer in middle and posterior parts; notopodial lobes longer. No subpodial or stomach papillae. Abdominal notopodia digitiform, same length as branchiae or shorter; abdominal neuropodia weakly bilobed, with short round lobes, inner slightly larger. Subpodial flange not developed, no flange papillae. All chaetae crenulated capillaries; forked chaetae not observed, probably broken. Colour in ethanol whitish-brown, with pigment spots on prostomium and in intersegmental furrows, or completely white.
Remarks.
Leitoscoloplos abranchiatus was described as entirely lacking branchiae, but all specimens studied were posteriorly incomplete ( Hartman 1967a; Mackie 1987; Blake 2017). Specimens described here resemble L. abranchiatus by the number of thoracic chaetigers, shape of thoracic postchaetal lobes, shape and more lateral than dorsal position of abdominal parapodia.
Records.
4 specimens. Suppl. material 1: ops. 9, 16, 54 (AM).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |