Simopone nonnihil, Bolton & Fisher, 2012
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3283.1.1 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/7321441A-FFCC-FFEF-13F8-7F04C15F7495 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Simopone nonnihil |
status |
sp. n. |
Simopone nonnihil Bolton & Fisher sp. n.
( Figs 61–63 View FIGURES 61–63 )
WORKER (holotype in parentheses). HL 1.22–1.68 (1.54), HW 0.74–1.16 (0.99), SL 0.34–0.52 (0.45), EL 0.34– 0.48 (0.42), PW 0.60–0.92 (0.78), AIIW 0.59–0.88 (0.78), AIIL 0.64–0.90 (0.80), AIIIW 0.68–1.04 (0.92), AIIIL
0.73–1.10 (0.93), WL 1.32–1.86 (1.70), MFL 0.60–1.00 (0.88), CI 61–72 (64), SI 42–46 (45), EL/HW 0.39–0.46 (0.42), EP 0.87–1.12 (1.12), AIIW/AIIL 0.92–1.01 (0.98), AIIIW/AIIIL 0.93–1.01 (0.99) (9 measured).
In full-face view anteriormost points of frontal lobes distinctly project forward as a pair of lobes that extend beyond the level of the anterior clypeal margin. Midpoint of anterior clypeal margin without a convex tumulus, so that the margin is evenly transverse or shallowly convex across. Eyes located close to the cephalic midlength (EP 0.87–1.12). Leading edge of scape with 1–2 projecting setae that are inclined toward the scape apex. In full-face view sides of head without projecting setae. Cephalic dorsum in profile with one, rarely two, short standing setae above the eye; these setae easily lost by abrasion. Ventral surface of head with distinct setae. Cephalic dorsum between eyes with longitudinally directed dense striolate-punctulate ground sculpture between punctures. In dorsal view the pronotum with a transverse carina anteriorly. Propodeal dorsum separated from declivity by a weak, low carina that is interrupted medially. Promesonotal suture weakly impressed and shallowly, evenly curved across the dorsum, not V-shaped medially. Metanotal groove vestigial to absent. Mesosoma in dorsal view narrower across mesonotum than propodeum. Density of punctate sculpture on pronotal and mesonotal dorsa about the same, without a very obvious reduction in density on the mesonotum. Pronotum with a single pair of setae close to the humeri, but these easily lost by abrasion; mesonotum and propodeum without setae. Dorsal (outer) surfaces of mesotibiae and metatibiae without projecting setae, except sometimes for one, close to the apex. Dorsal surface of AII (petiole) meets anterior surface through an angle, but there is no transverse carina. Posteriorly the dorsum of AII lacks a sharp carina, but usually a weak impression is present immediately above the foramen. In dorsal view the posterior corners of AII are bluntly angulate, but without posteriorly or laterally projecting sharp angles or teeth. In dorsal view AII and AIII as long as broad to slightly longer than broad. Abdominal tergites from AII to AIV without setae, but setae sparsely present at least posteriorly on sternite of AIII, and obvious on sternite of AIV. Abdominal tergites AII to AIV sculptured only with small punctures. Full adult colour black, appendages and clypeus somewhat lighter; often with a dull reddish spot on sides of pronotum, AIII and AIV.
Holotype worker (upper specimen of two on pin), Madagascar: Toamasina, Ambohidena , 20 m., 16°49.46’S, 49°57.85’E, 21-24.xi.2005, BLF12984, CASENT0066745-RES, littoral forest (B.L. Fisher) ( CASC). GoogleMaps
Paratypes. 1 worker mounted below holotype (crudely dissected); 1 worker and 1 male (abdominal segments behind AII missing) with same data as holotype ( CASC) GoogleMaps .
See the comparative notes under emeryi ; for the male see under Malagasy males, below.
Non-paratypic material examined. Madagascar: Prov. Toamasina, Mont Anjanaharibe, NNE Ambinanitele (B.L. Fisher); SSW Befingotra, Res. Anjananaribe-Sud (B.L. Fisher); Prov., Toamasina, Ambohidena (B.L. Fisher); Toliara, Forêt Ivohibe (B.L. Fisher); Toliara, Rés. Spéc. Ambatovaky, Sandrangato River (B.L. Fisher); RS Marotandrano (B.L. Fisher); SSW Iminiminy, Res. Androhahela (G.D. Alpert) .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |