Hypoxys boerneri (Breddin, 1904) Nunes & Campos & Mendonca & Cunha & Fernandes, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4742.3.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:44ECBE3C-DEA4-4A6B-87D8-D7065591577C |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3684982 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/720587AC-317A-D916-44B2-69C3FAD81AC5 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Hypoxys boerneri (Breddin, 1904) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Hypoxys boerneri (Breddin, 1904) comb. nov.
( Figs 2 View FIGURE 2 A–E; 18 C–D; 21)
Edessa boerneri Breddin, 1904a: 141 ; Breddin, 1907: 327; Bergroth, 1908: 178; Kirkaldy, 1909: 154 (catalog)
Lectotype male. Peru, Marcapata ( SDEI). Designated by Gaedike (1971:81). Examined. Gaedike did not mention the gender of the Lectotype, so we are here designating the male as Lectotype.
Material examined. BRAZIL. Amazonas: ♀ Nova Olinda, Rio Purus, S. M., Klages, Dec 1922, Carn. Mus. Acc. 7088, Insect collection Carnegie Museum of Natural History , Pittsburgh, Pa. ( CMNH) ; Rondônia: ♂ ♀ 62 km SW Ariquemes, nr Fzda Rancho Grande 6–15–XII–1990, DA Rider & JE Eger. D. A. Rider Collection ( DAR) ; same data : ♂ 8–20–XI–1994, JE Eger & LB & CW O’Brien ( JEE) ; ♀ 3–15–XII–1996, JE Eger. J. E. Eger collec- tion ( JEE) ; BOLIVIA. La Paz: ♀ ♂ Yungas, 1000 m. H. Rolle, Berlin. S. W. 11, Dtsch. Entomol. Institut Berlin Coll, Breddin. Hypoxys boerneri . Edessa boerneri Breddin, 1904 Comp. w. TYPE Fernandes, JAM 1999 ( SDEI) ; Cochabamba: ♀ Region Chaparé , 400 mtr. 3–I–1949, Dirings ( MZUSP) ; same data : ♂ 23–X–1949 ( MZUSP) ; ♀ 30–I–1950 ( MZUSP) ; Santa Cruz: ♀ 3/ 7 km SSE Buena Vista, Hotel Flora & Fauna , 430 m . XI–2002, B. K. Dozier, Coll. ( JEE) ; no data: ♀ 72206, 3951 ( MZUSP) .
Measurements. total length: 15.1–18.2; head length: 1.9–2.3; head width: 3.0–3.6; pronotal width: 9.2–10.9; abdominal width: 8.2–10.0; length of antennal segments. I: 0.8–1.0; II: 1.8–2.1; III: 1.3–2.0; IV: 4.0–5.0; V: 4.9–5.4; interocular distance: 1.2–1.6; scutellum length: 6.9–8.4; scutellum width: 5.1–6.2; pronotal length: 3.1–3.7.
Diagnosis. Anterolateral margin of pronotum with incomplete solid black stripe. Cicatrices with concolorous punctures delimiting anterior sulci ( Fig. 18C View FIGURE 18 ). Anterolateral margin not punctured. Scutellum with anterior margin greenish yellow ( Fig. 18C View FIGURE 18 ). Body ventrally with dark lines faded ( Fig. 18D View FIGURE 18 ). Male ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 A–C). Pygophore with dorsal rim barely excavated subrectangular in the middle ( Fig. 2A View FIGURE 2 ). Superior process of genital cup elliptic with a ventral lobe; adjacent to dorsal rim. Paramere head almost flat ( Fig. 2B View FIGURE 2 ), margin black; anterior lobe rounded, elongated, almost reaching superior process; posterior lobe short and acuminated; stalk tumid with low carina on anterior lobe ( Fig. 2B View FIGURE 2 ). Proctiger with dorsolateral tuft of setae separated by large, slightly tumid ridge; posterior face subpentagonal with a medial crest ( Fig. 2B,C View FIGURE 2 ). Ventral rim deeply excavated between posterolateral angle and expansion of ventral rim ( Fig. 2C View FIGURE 2 ), showing paramere visible in lateral view; expansions slightly tumid, long, narrow, apices rounded, surpassing level of posterolateral angles in ventral view ( Fig. 2C View FIGURE 2 ). Female ( Fig. 2D View FIGURE 2 ). Posterior margin of gonocoxites 8 sinuous, inner angle rounded, projected over gonocoxites 9; sutural border strongly excavated in a narrow “U”. Gonapophyses 8 exposed, sclerotized.
Comments. Breddin (1904a) considered Edessa boerneri very similar to E. quadridens , but this similarity occurs among the species belonging to this group of species, as mentioned above. However, analyzing the genitalia of both sexes is possible to see that both species are really different. The pygophore of Hypoxys boerneri is quite unique in Hypoxys due to the exceptionally large lateral excavation and shape of ventral rim ( Fig. 2B,C View FIGURE 2 ). Gonocoxites 8 and sutural border of H. offuscatus and H. necopinatus ( Fig. 7D View FIGURE 7 and 6D View FIGURE 6 ) are very similar to H. boerneri ( Fig. 2D View FIGURE 2 ) and isolated females are hard to identify, especially in areas with sympatric distribution.
Distribution ( Fig. 21 View FIGURE 21 ). BRAZIL: Amazonas, Rondônia; BOLIVIA: La Paz, Cochabamba, Santa Cruz.
CMNH |
USA, Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh, Carnegie Museum of Natural History |
CMNH |
The Cleveland Museum of Natural History |
MZUSP |
Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de Sao Paulo |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Hypoxys boerneri (Breddin, 1904)
Nunes, Benedito Mendes, Campos, Lourival Dias, Mendonca, Maria Thayane Da Silva, Cunha, Eduardo Victor De Paiva & Fernandes, Jose Antonio Marin 2020 |
Edessa boerneri
Kirkaldy, G. W. 1909: 154 |
Breddin, G. 1907: 327 |
Breddin, G. 1904: 141 |