Microsphaeropsis cytisicola (Artand & Mehrabi-Koushki & Tabein & Hyde & Jayawardena, 2022)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5252/cryptogamie-mycologie2022v43a7 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7815354 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/71328784-9E6B-CB76-FC66-2981FC1AEDD5 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Microsphaeropsis cytisicola |
status |
comb. nov. |
(Wanas., Camporesi, E.B.G.Jones & K.D.Hyde) M.Mehrabi-Koushki, K.D.Hyde & Jayaward., comb. nov.
Neomicrosphaeropsis cytisicola Wanas., Camporesi, E.B.G.Jones & K.D.Hyde View in CoL , Studies in Fungi 3 (1): 169 (Wanasinghe et al. 2018).
MYCOBANK. — MB 841488.
DESCRIPTION
See Wanasinghe e t al. (2018).
NOTES
Neomicrosphaeropsis cytisicola was firstly isolated from dead aerial branches of Cytisus sp. (Fabaceae) in Italy and described by Wanasinghe et al. (2018) as a saprobic fungus.According to its position on the phylogenetic tree ( Fig. 1 View FIG ) and SNP analysis of four genomic regions, we transfer Neomicrosphaeropsis cytisicola to Microsphaeropsis . Nucleotide comparison of Microsphaeropsis cytisicola (Wanas., Camporesi, E.B.G.Jones & K.D.Hyde) M.Mehrabi-Koushki, K.D.Hyde & Jayaward. , comb. nov. with Neomicrosphaeropsis species showed a difference of 0.6% (3/521 bp) in the LSU region, 3% (13/431 bp) in the ITS, 13.6% (36/265 bp) in tub 2 and 10% (44/438 bp) in the rpb 2.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |