Doris marginata Quoy and Gaimard, 1832
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s13127-023-00611-0 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/706C87DE-FFD6-C216-19D5-6EB84D8EF3F7 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Doris marginata Quoy and Gaimard, 1832 |
status |
|
Doris marginata Quoy and Gaimard, 1832 (Fig. 26D)
Description notes Only external morphology: size 200 mm; body red, oval; mantle wide, margin undulating all around except on head; gill branches arranged around anus and forming seven tufts; oral tentacles oval and crenate; specimen observed swimming violently.
Own conclusion/opinion on its taxonomic status This species was by most authors regarded as a junior synonym of H. sanguineus . However, Yonow (2001) suggested that H. sanguineus was endemic to the Red Sea and this species should be considered valid. The species epithet “ marginatus ” was the second available name for the widely distributed Indo-Pacific “ Hexabranchus lacer .” Because the description of “ H. lacer ” did not include coloration and present distinct pustules, several authors overlooked that name and applied “ marginatus ” for that species ( Baba, 1936; Kay & Young, 1969; Risbec, 1928; Yonow, 2001). Nevertheless, here we show that “ H. lacer ” should have priority over “ marginatus .” The illustration shows that this species is a morphotype of H. lacer differing from H. giganteus sp. nov. of similar size by the lack of pink blotches, a dark red submarginal band lined in white and dorsum texture.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |