Dicotylophyllum sp. H

Kovar-Eder, Johanna, Kvaček, Zlatko, Teodoridis, Vasilis, Mazouch, Petr & Collinson, Margaret E., 2022, Floristic, Vegetation And Climate Assessment Of The Early / Middle Miocene Parschlug Flora Indicates A Distinctly Seasonal Climate, Fossil Imprint 78 (1), pp. 80-144 : 90

Dicotylophyllum sp. H

Pl. 4, Fig. 1

1860 Sapindus pythii UNGER ; Unger, p. 33, pl. 14, figs 6–8.

M a t e r i a l. GBA 1848/0001/0078, Unger (1860: 33, pl. 14, fig. 8).

D e s c r i p t i o n. Leafletshortlypetiolulate;laminanarrow oblong, l × w = 148 × 28 mm, ratio l/w = 5.4, base distinctly asymmetrically cuneate-convex, apex acute-acuminate, margin regularly densely serrate, teeth blunt, (?) glandular; midvein strong, gently bent; secondaries semicraspedodromous, quite densely spaced, rather straight, arising at moderate angles, near the asymmetrical base at wider angles on one side than on the other, looping near margin; (?) short simple intersecondaries; tertiaries irregular, forming meshes.

Differing from Ailanthus pythii see that taxon.

Differing from Dicotylophyllum sp. GG by regularly spaced and blunt, possibly glandular teeth, long and slender lamina and less dense venation.

Differing from Fraxinus sp. by the strongly asymmetric base, slender shape, regularly, more densely spaced and larger teeth and straight course of secondaries.

Differing from Ternstroemites pereger by larger size, short petiole, distinctly asymmetrical base, basally bent midvein, teeth present near the base.