Pachybrachis Chevrolat, 1836
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.332.4753 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6DF8A9BF-5F82-0C31-F68C-9C7BEE428800 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Pachybrachis Chevrolat, 1836 |
status |
|
Pachybrachis Chevrolat in Dejean, 1836: 420. Type species: Cryptocephalus hieroglyphicus Laicharting, 1781, by subsequent designation of Jacoby 1908: 265.
Pachybrachys : Mannerheim 1843: 311. [incorrect subsequent spelling].
Remarks.
There has been some debate as to the correct spelling of the genus Pachybrachis . Fall’s (1915) monumental work used Pachybrachys Chevrolat and cited its general American usage by J. L. LeConte. However, this emendation was unjustified under the rules of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature ( ICZN 1999, Article 32).
Pachybrachis is a member of the subfamily Cryptocephalinae Gyllenhall, 1813, commonly known as the case bearers due to the fact that all known larval stages live in a case constructed of their fecal matter and often plant debris ( LeSage 1985). Their cylindrical, compact body characterizes the adults, which usually have the head retracted into the pronotum to the level of the eyes.
In the recent revision of family-group names in Coleoptera ( Bouchard et al. 2011), the former tribe Pachybrachini Chapuis, 1874 was relegated to subtribe under the tribe Cryptocephalini Gyllenhal, 1813. Pachybrachina Chapuis, 1874 contains only two genera north of Mexico, Griburius and Pachybrachis , and is characterized by long filiform antennae, with a marginal bead at the base of pronotum which is not crenulate. Riley et al. (2002) separated the two genera by prosternal charateristics (prosternum broad, as wide as long in Griburius , narrower, longer than wide in Pachybrachis ). Additional generic keys can be found in Blatchley (1910), Chagnon and Robert (1962), Downie and Arnett (1996), and Ciegler (2007).
Useful morphological characters. Fall (1915) provided a very detailed "Review of Structural Characters Useful in Taxonomy", which we will not repeat here. However, there are a few key characters that will be useful to separate the seventeen Canadian species. These features will be described, detailed and illustrated, most of them being used in the identification key.
Size. The seventeen species can generally be divided into four size classes by average length: very small, <1.75 mm; small,>1.75 mm to 2.35 mm; medium,>2.35 mm to 2.85 mm; and large,>2.85 mm to 3.30 mm. Pachybrachis hepaticus is the only species in the very small category, with a mean length of 1.68 mm. Pachybrachis m-nigrum (2.59 mm), Pachybrachis othonus othonus (2.63 mm), and Pachybrachis luridus (2.65 mm) are in the medium category. Pachybrachis trinotatus (3.09 mm) and Pachybrachis bivittatus (3.12 mm) are the only species with males averaging over 3 mm in length. Small is the largest category, with the remaining eleven species. Mean length and width of males are reported for each species. Females are generally larger, thus accounting for the larger overall sizes reported by Fall (1915).
Antennae. In most species (e.g. Pachybrachis atomarius , Habitus 1 View Habitus 1 ; Pachybrachis bivittatus , Habitus 2 View Habitus 2 ), the length of antennae equals about 2/3 to 3/4 the length of the body. There are two noticeable exceptions. In Pachybrachis hepaticus ( Habitus 5 View Habitus 5 ) the antennae do not exceed half of the body length, whereas in Pachybrachis trinotatus ( Habitus 17 View Habitus 17 ) the antennae equal or exceed the body length.
Eyes. The eyes of Pachybrachis pectoralis are close to each other and separated by less than their width ( Figure 1a View Figure 1 ). In most species the distance between the eyes roughly corresponds to their width (e.g. Pachybrachis peccans , Figure 1b View Figure 1 ). A normal distance between eyes, coupled with the head coloration, can be diagnostic, as in Pachybrachis atomarius that has a largely yellow face ( Figure 1c View Figure 1 ). In Pachybrachis hepaticus , the eyes are very small and markedly remote, separated by much more than their diameter ( Figure 1d View Figure 1 ).
Ocular lines. Many Pachybrachis species have an impressed line, called the ocular line, around the margin of the eyes, and in some species the line diverges from each eye as lines of darker colored punctures between the eyes (e.g. Pachybrachis peccans , Figure 2a View Figure 2 ). This character is very consistent within each species, and it is easy to see provided the specimens are properly oriented and lighted. In Pachybrachis hepaticus the ocular lines are very short but distinct above the eyes ( Figure 2b View Figure 2 ). In other species, however, such ocular lines are absent (e.g. Pachybrachis spumarius , Figure 2c View Figure 2 ).
Femora. Except for Pachybrachis hepaticus ( Figure 3a View Figure 3 ), the femora on the forelegs of all species ( Figure 3b View Figure 3 ) are incrassate or thickened in relation to the other femora. This character is difficult to see because in most cases legs are folded and pressed tightly against the body. Consequently, it might be necessary to relax the legs and spread them out to compare the front femora with those of the middle and hind legs. When such preparation is achieved, the larger size of the femora becomes evident (e.g. Pachybrachis calcaratus , Habitus 3 View Habitus 3 ).
Claws. In Pachybrachis , the tarsal claws are all simple ( Figures 4a-d View Figure 4 ), but claws on the forelegs ( Figures 4a, b View Figure 4 ) of several species are distinctly enlarged relative to the claws on the other legs ( Figures 4c, d View Figure 4 ), as in Pachybrachis peccans ( Habitus 12 View Habitus 12 ) or Pachybrachis pectoralis ( Habitus 13 View Habitus 13 ). Due to the position of the legs in dead specimens, this character is often easier to see in lateral view ( Figures 4c, d View Figure 4 ) than in front view ( Figures 4a, b View Figure 4 ).
Tibial spurs. In Pachybrachis atomarius ( Habitus 1 View Habitus 1 ), Pachybrachis m-nigrum ( Habitus 8 View Habitus 8 ), and Pachybrachis trinotatus ( Habitus 17 View Habitus 17 ), there is no apical spur on front tibia ( Figure 5a View Figure 5 ), but a tuft of large apical setae grouped together may superficially look like a spur. In Pachybrachis spumarius ( Figure 5b View Figure 5 , Habitus 14 View Habitus 14 ) the front tibial spur is very small, hidden and difficult to see, but the very large and exposed front tibial spur is unique and distinctive of Pachybrachis calcaratus ( Figure 5c View Figure 5 , Habitus 3 View Habitus 3 ). In all species, except Pachybrachis hepaticus , the middle tibiae are armed with small slender apical spur ( Figure 5d View Figure 5 ). In all species studied here, the hind tibiae are unarmed.
Pronotum. In Pachybrachis , the pronotum is margined at base, the margin usually ornamented with a row of large punctures ( Figure 6a View Figure 6 , close up). This character is very useful to separate Pachybrachis Chevrolat from Cryptocephalus Geoffroy or Bassareus Haldeman. The last two genera superficially look like Pachybrachis but are not margined at the base of the pronotum.
The density and pattern of pronotal punctures can be a useful character. Punctures usually dissipate near the side margins, and are generally a darker color than the background.
The pronotal coloration varies from a common mottled pattern (e.g. Pachybrachis spumarius , Figure 6b View Figure 6 ), to a black M-mark on a light background (e.g. Pachybrachis m-nigrum , Figure 6c View Figure 6 ), to an almost entirely black pronotum with only yellow basal and lateral markings (e.g. Pachybrachis nigricornis carbonarius , Figure 6d View Figure 6 ).
Elytra. As on the pronotum, the density and pattern of punctures on the elytra are easily seen and useful characters. The elytral punctures generally form fairly regular deep striae, consisting of one sutural, one marginal and eight discal striae on each elytron, although the first may be somewhat irregular in the basal third (e.g. Pachybrachis luctuosus , Figure 7a View Figure 7 ). Punctures may be confused in the basal half but with a tendency towards regular rows in the apical half, as in Pachybrachis calcaratus ( Figure 7b View Figure 7 ). Finally, punctures may be completely confused and not aligned at all in rows (e.g. Pachybrachis hepaticus , Figure 7c View Figure 7 ).
The elytral color pattern is, of course, a very useful character for the identification of many species. The mottled pattern is common (e.g. Pachybrachis spumarius , Figure 7d View Figure 7 ). Some species are vittate (= with longitudinal black stripes), sometimes with a lateral vitta interrupted as in Pachybrachis bivittatus ( Figure 7e View Figure 7 ). In some species, the elytra are largely black with only a few yellow markings or with narrow apical and lateral margins (e.g. Pachybrachis nigricornis carbonarius , Figure 7f View Figure 7 ), or the elytra can be entirely black (e.g. Pachybrachis luridus , Figure 7g View Figure 7 ).
Pygidium. The coloration of the pygidium can be largely yellow (e.g. Pachybrachis bivittatus , Figure 8a View Figure 8 ), dark with distinct yellow spots of various sizes (e.g. Pachybrachis cephalicus , Figure 8b View Figure 8 ), or dark with faint small reddish spots (e.g. Pachybrachis spumarius , Figure 8c View Figure 8 ). A completely black pygidium is distinctive of Pachybrachis atomarius ( Figure 8d View Figure 8 ).
Sexes. Males are usually smaller and less robust than females, with their abdomen flat ( Figure 9a View Figure 9 ). In females, the abdomen is convex beneath, the last visible segment having a deep, round, concave depression or fovea ( Figure 9b View Figure 9 ).
Genitalia. In most cases, individuals of each sex can be identified to species using coloration and external morphological features alone. However, an examination of the aedeagus is essential for the determination of superficially similar and variable species, such as Pachybrachis cephalicus , Pachybrachis luctuosus and Pachybrachis spumarius .
In Pachybrachis , the basal portion of the aedeagus may appear bulbous (e.g. Pachybrachis luctuosus , Figure 10a View Figure 10 ) or more tubular ( Figure 10b View Figure 10 ), but we don’t know yet if this character is reliable and consistent. The apical half is usually considerably bent, sometimes at a right angle, the degree of the curvature being an important diagnostic feature. In lateral view, the tip of the aedeagus may appear straight, sinuous and curved upwards, or sinuous and curved downwards (e.g. Pachybrachis spumarius , Figure 10b View Figure 10 ). In dorsal view, the tip offers various shapes: small, large, pointed, triangular, lanceolate, nipple-shaped (e.g. Pachybrachis spumarius , Figure 10c View Figure 10 ), etc.
Although the genitalic features are very constant and most reliable, they have been rarely described and illustrated in Pachybrachis . In the following key to the males of the 17 species treated here, the aedeagus is reported for only three species when external morphological characters may not be sufficient. The female genitalia are still unknown for all of them.
Illustrated key to males
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/20870 | ||
1a | Front femora not thicker than others (Fig. 1.i); eyes small and remote (Fig. 1.iii); punctures of pronotum and elytra dense and confused ( Habitus 5 View Habitus 5 ) | Pachybrachis hepaticus hepaticus (F. E. Melsheimer) |
1b | Front femora thicker than others (Fig. 1.ii); eyes narrowly separated or normal (Fig. 1.iv) | 2 |
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/20872 | ||
2a | Ocular lines between eyes present (Fig. 2.i) | 3 |
2b | Ocular lines absent (Fig. 2.ii) | 6 |
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/20873 | ||
3a | Front claws larger (Figs 3.i, 3.ii) than middle or hind claws | 4 |
3b | Front claws not enlarged; size similar to those in middle and hind legs (Figs 3.iii, 3.iv) | 5 |
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/20876 | ||
4a | Eyes very close, separated by less than their width; ocular lines fine to indistinct (Fig. 4.i; Habitus 13 View Habitus 13 ) | Pachybrachis pectoralis (F. E. Melsheimer) |
4b | Eyes normal, more distant, ocular lines very distinct, with darker punctures (Fig. 4.ii; Habitus 12 View Habitus 12 ) | Pachybrachis peccans Suffrian |
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/20878 | ||
5 a | Last antennomere brownish; pronotum with subrectangular black markings pierced with yellow spots; elytral dark markings diffuse and irregular ( Habitus 10 View Habitus 10 ) | Pachybrachis obsoletus Suffrian |
5b | Antennae entirely yellow; pronotum with solid black rectangular markings; elytral dark markings well-defined ( Habitus 16 View Habitus 16 ) | Pachybrachis tridens (F. E. Melsheimer) |
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/20880 | ||
6a | Elytra vittate (with longitudinal color stripes) (Fig. 6.i) | 7 |
6b | Elytra mottled (Fig. 6.ii), spotted (Fig. 16.iii), or mostly to entirely black (Fig. 6.iv) | 9 |
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/20883 | ||
7a | Elytral punctures confused, outer (marginal) vitta often interrupted, pronotum yellow with darker reddish M-shaped mark ( Habitus 2 View Habitus 2 ) | Pachybrachis bivittatus (Say) |
7b | Many elytral punctures arranged in rows (Fig. 7.i); pronotum not reddish, rather yellow with black markings of various sizes and shapes (Fig. 7.ii) | 8 |
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/20885 | ||
8a | Pronotum black, margined with yellow; sutural, discal and marginal vittae of elytra distinct ( Habitus 11 View Habitus 11 ) | Pachybrachis othonus othonus (Say) |
8b | Pronotum yellow with large, black, M-shaped marking; marginal and discal vittae of elytra very variable, usually not distinct ( Habitus 9a View Habitus 9a ) | Pachybrachis nigricornis difficilis Fall |
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/20888 | ||
9 a | Body entirely black, or sides and apex narrowly margined with yellow in some females ( Habitus 9b View Habitus 9b ) | Pachybrachis nigricornis carbonarius Haldeman |
9b | Pronotum mottled (Fig. 9.i) or with reddish spots (Fig. 9.ii); elytra variable, black (Fig. 9.iii) to mottled (Fig. 9.iv) | 10 |
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/20890 | ||
10a | Elytra almost or entirely black (Fig. 10.i) | 11 |
10b | Elytra spotted (Fig. 10.ii) or mottled (Fig. 10.iii) | 13 |
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/20892 | ||
11a | Antennae longer than body; pronotum reddish with black M-mark; elytra entirely black ( Habitus 17 View Habitus 17 ) | Pachybrachis trinotatus (F. E. Melsheimer) |
11b | Antennae shorter than body; pronotum black (Fig. 11.i), mottled (Fig.11.ii), or with M-shaped marking (Fig. 11.iii, H 8 below); if pronotum with M-shaped marking, then elytra mottled, not entirely black | 12 |
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/20894 | ||
12a | Elytra entirely black to streaked with whitish-yellow in outer areas; pronotum with reddish sides and upside-down reddish Y-mark ( Habitus 7 View Habitus 7 ) | Pachybrachis luridus (Fabricius) |
12b | Elytra with large median reddish spots almost joining at suture, with additional smaller apical spots; pronotum entirely black ( Habitus 15 View Habitus 15 ) | Pachybrachis subfasciatus (J. E. LeConte) |
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/20896 | ||
13 a | Elytra yellow with black markings; pronotum with well-defined black M-mark; size larger, 3+ mm ( Habitus 8 View Habitus 8 ) | Pachybrachis m-nigrum (F. E. Melsheimer) |
13b | Elytra (Fig. 13.i) and pronotum mottled (Fig. 13.ii), no decernable pattern; size smaller, less than 3 mm | 14 |
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/20897 | ||
14a | Front tibia with large, curved spur (Fig. 14.i, Habitus 3 View Habitus 3 ) | Pachybrachis calcaratus Fall |
14b | Front tibia with tiny spur (Fig. 14.ii), or without spur (Fig. 14.iii) | 15 |
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/20899 | ||
15a | Face largely yellow in males (Fig. 15.i); pygidium entirely black (Fig. 15.iii); pronotum and elytra mottled ( Habitus 1 View Habitus 1 ) | Pachybrachis atomarius (F. E. Melsheimer) |
15b | Face largely dark (Fig. 15.ii); pygidium spotted, with spots of some specimens being smaller and fainter than illustrated (Fig. 15.iv) | 16 |
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/20900 | ||
16a | Elytral punctures regular in deeply impressed striae; size small (2 mm) ( Habitus 6 View Habitus 6 ); aedeagus with apical diamond-shaped denticle (Figs 16.i, 16.ii) | Pachybrachis luctuosus Suffrian |
16b | Elytral punctures confused, not inserted into deep striae (Fig. 16.iii); size larger (2+ mm); aedeagus different (Figs. 17.i, 17.iii) | 17 |
https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/20902 | ||
17 a | Pronotum mostly fuscous, with relatively few pale markings, densely punctate, darker than elytra ( Habitus 4 View Habitus 4 ); aedeagus slender, sinuous, and sharper at apex in lateral view (Fig. 17.i); aedeagal tip triangular in dorsal view (Fig. 17.ii) | Pachybrachis cephalicus Fall |
17b | Markings of pronotum and elytra numerous; darker areas dark brown to rufous ( Habitus 14 View Habitus 14 ); aedeagus sinuous and thicker at apex in lateral view (Fig. 17.iii); aedeagal tip nipple-shaped in dorsal view (Figs. 17.iv) | Pachybrachis spumarius Suffrian |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Pachybrachis Chevrolat, 1836
Barney, Robert J., LeSage, Laurent & Savard, Karine 2013 |
Pachybrachis
Chevrolat 1836 |
Cryptocephalus hieroglyphicus
Laicharting 1781 |