Maimuna antalyensis, Zamani & Kaya & Marusik, 2024

Zamani, Alireza, Kaya, Rahşen S. & Marusik, Yuri M., 2024, New taxonomic and faunistic data on the funnel-weavers (Araneae, Agelenidae) of Turkiye and the Caucasus, with five new species, ZooKeys 1218, pp. 251-286 : 251-286

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.3897/zookeys.1218.135249

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7F6A7B71-74A9-42BA-A258-C28544EAC887

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14199430

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/3A871504-2F88-4DF2-9053-90DFF4238122

taxon LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:act:3A871504-2F88-4DF2-9053-90DFF4238122

treatment provided by

ZooKeys by Pensoft

scientific name

Maimuna antalyensis
status

sp. nov.

Maimuna antalyensis sp. nov.

Figs 1 A, B View Figure 1 , 2 A – C View Figure 2 , 3 A – D View Figure 3 , 4 A – D View Figure 4

Type material.

Holotype • ♂ ( ZMUT), Turkiye: Antalya Prov.: Alanya, env. Kestel, Dim Valley , 36°32'34.5"N, 32°06'17.5"E, 110 m, pine and oak forest, 2.01.2013 (Y. M. Marusik) GoogleMaps . Paratypes: • 5 ♀ ( ZMUT), same data as for the holotype GoogleMaps ; • 1 ♀ ( ZMUT), Asmaca , 36°36'32.3"N, 32°03'12.4"E, 686 m, pine and oak forest, 3.01.2013 (Y. M. Marusik) GoogleMaps ; • 2 ♀ ( ZMUT), Elikesik rd. , 36°33'55.6"N, 31°55'30.3"E, 24 m, maquis on S exposed slope, 8.01.2013 (Y. M. Marusik) GoogleMaps ; • 2 ♀ ( ZMUT), slopes of Alanya Castle, Damlataş side , 36°32'11.6"N, 31°59'30.3"E, 50 m, pine forest, under stones and in litter, 7.01.2013 (Y. M. Marusik) GoogleMaps .

Comparative material.

Maimuna vestita (C. L. Koch, 1841) : Turkiye: Bursa Prov.: • 1 ♀ ( ZMUU), Bursa Uludağ University campus area , 30.11.1999 (R. S. Kaya) ; • 2 ♀ ( ZMUU), same, 16.05.2000 (R. S. Kaya) ; • 1 ♀ ( ZMUU), same, 3.03.2003 (R. S. Kaya) ; • 1 ♀ ( ZMUU), same, 10.09.2005 (R. S. Kaya) ; • 1 ♂ 1 ♀ ( ZMUU), same, 20.04.2012 (R. S. Kaya) ; • 1 ♂ 1 ♀ ( ZMUU), same, 21.05.2012 (R. S. Kaya) ; • 5 ♀ ( ZMUU), same, 4.05.2023 (R. S. Kaya) ; • 2 ♂ 3 ♀ ( ZMUU), same, 4.01.2024 (R. S. Kaya) ; • 1 ♂ 2 ♀ ( ZMUU), same, 11.07.2024 (R. S. Kaya) ; • 5 ♀ ( ZMUU), Lake Uluabat, Halilbey Island , 8.04.2001 (R. S. Kaya) ; • 1 ♂ 3 ♀ ( ZMUU), Lake Uluabat, Terzioğlu Island , 14.10.2004 (R. S. Kaya) ; • 5 ♀ ( ZMUU), same, 25.04.2005 (R. S. Kaya) ; • 1 ♂ 2 ♀ ( ZMUU), Lake Uluabat, Manastır Island , 28.09.2005 (R. S. Kaya) ; • 1 ♂ ( ZMUU), same, 29.09.2005 (R. S. Kaya) ; • 2 ♂ 1 ♀ ( ZMUU), Lake Uluabat, Halilbey Island , 15.12.2005 (R. S. Kaya) ; • 1 ♀ ( ZMUU), Karacabey, Boğaz , 4.05.2005 (R. S. Kaya) ; • 3 ♀ ( ZMUU), same, 8.08.2007 (R. S. Kaya) ; • 2 ♀ ( ZMUU), same, 5.06.2018 (R. S. Kaya) ; • 2 ♀ ( ZMUU), same, 11.06.2021 (R. S. Kaya) ; • 1 ♂ 1 ♀ ( ZMUU), Kaplıkaya , 29.03.2007 (R. S. Kaya) ; • 2 ♂ 2 ♀ ( ZMUU), same, 10.12.2008 (R. S. Kaya) ; • 1 ♀ ( ZMUU), Görükle Vill. , 20.04.2012 (R. S. Kaya) ; • 1 ♀ ( ZMUU), Nilüfer Metro station , 26.05.2012 (R. S. Kaya) ; • 1 ♂ ( ZMUU), Orhangazi Dist. , 4.05.2014 (R. S. Kaya) ; Çanakkale Prov.: • 1 ♀ ( ZMUU), Gökçeada Island, Lake salt area , 4.05.2004 (R. S. Kaya) .

Diagnosis.

The new species is similar to M. cariae Brignoli, 1978 in the overall shape of its copulatory organs. The male differs by having a shorter tip of the cymbium (as long as the palpal tibia, vs longer), and by a different shape of the conductor and the median process (cf. Fig. 3 B – D and Dimitrov 2022 View Figure 3 : fig. 26). The female of the new species has a hexagonal epigynal fovea, in contrast to the subtriangular fovea of M. cariae (cf. Fig. 2 A, B View Figure 2 and Dimitrov 2022: fig. 17).

Description.

Male. Habitus as in Fig. 1 A View Figure 1 . Total length 5.40. Carapace 2.60 long, 1.90 wide. Eye sizes: AME: 0.10, ALE: 0.13, PME: 0.18, PLE: 0.13. Carapace, sternum, labium, and maxillae pale brown; carapace with darker submedian bands; ocular region black. Legs yellowish brown, with annulations. Abdomen dorsally dark greyish with paler chevrons, pale greyish ventrally. Spinnerets pale greyish, darker basally. Measurements of legs: I: 5.81 + missing Ta (1.74, 0.82, 1.43, 1.82, missing), II: 6.73 (1.77, 0.82, 1.37, 1.73, 1.04), III: 6.64 (1.74, 0.76, 1.34, 1.74, 1.06), IV: 8.53 (2.19, 0.85, 1.80, 2.55, 1.14).

Palp as in Figs 3 A – D View Figure 3 , 4 A – D View Figure 4 ; femur modified – with retroventral bump in mid part, ~ 3 × longer than wide, shorter than cymbium; dorsal length of patella same as in tibia; tibia ~ 1.4 × wider than long (Fig. 3 C, D View Figure 3 ), lacking prominent apophysis but with retroventral crest (Vc) (Fig. 3 A, B View Figure 3 ); cymbium ~ 1.4 × longer than wide, with tip ~ 1 / 3 of cymbial length; bulb as long as wide; conductor (Cn) massive, strongly sclerotized prolateral arm lacking, terminal part with two claw-like projections (Cc; Fig. 4 D View Figure 4 ); median process (Mp) massive, roundly bent in lateral view (Fig. 4 B, C View Figure 4 ); embolus (Em) filiform, weakly sclerotized, with small base (Eb).

Female. Habitus as in Fig. 1 B View Figure 1 . Total length 7.50. Carapace 3.28 long, 2.07 wide. Eye sizes: AME: 0.12, ALE: 0.17, PME: 0.20, PLE: 0.15. Coloration as in male. Measurements of legs: I: 7.25 (1.94, 1.02, 1.44, 1.76, 1.09), II: 7.24 (1.85, 1.05, 1.47, 1.73, 1.14), III: 7.37 (2.00, 0.96, 1.42, 1.94, 1.05), IV: 9.58 (2.45, 1.11, 2.13, 2.66, 1.23).

Epigyne as in Fig. 2 A – C View Figure 2 ; epigynal plate slightly wider than long; fovea (Fo) hexagonal, approximately as long as wide, located anteriorly (Fig. 2 C View Figure 2 ); copulatory ducts gradually turning to receptacles and approximately as wide as receptacles; copulatory ducts converging and contiguous, receptacles diverging (Fig. 2 A, B View Figure 2 ).

Comment.

In the examined comparative female specimens of M. vestita , we observed noticeable variation in both body size and epigyne morphology. In particular, in smaller individuals, the shape of the epigynal fovea can vary significantly. A similar pattern is observed in M. antalyensis sp. nov., where smaller females also exhibit variation in the shape of the epigynal fovea, ranging from hexagonal to nearly circular in some specimens.

Note.

For comments on the homology of the structure referred to here as the “ median process, ” see Kaya et al. (2023).

Distribution.

Known from the listed localities in Antalya Province, southwestern Turkiye.

Etymology.

The specific epithet refers to the type locality of the species in Antalya, Turkiye.

ZMUT

University of Tokyo, Department of Zoology

ZMUU

Uppsala Universitet, Zoologiska Museet

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Araneae

Family

Agelenidae

Genus

Maimuna