Geostiba (Sibiota) carinipennis, Assing, 2009
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5276563 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6D0E87E4-EA12-616B-44F8-F7CBFDC0FCCE |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Geostiba (Sibiota) carinipennis |
status |
sp. nov. |
Geostiba (Sibiota) carinipennis View in CoL nov.sp. ( Figs 53-61 View Figs 53-61 )
Holotype Ƌ: "N 36°03'30 E 036°08'36, TR Hatay Senköy , 730 m, 13.4.2009, Brachat & Meybohm (8) / Holotypus Ƌ Geostiba carinipennis sp. n. det. V. Assing 2009" (cAss) . Paratypes: 2♀♀: same data as holotype (cAss) ; 1Ƌ: "N 36°01'43 E 036°07'16, TR Hatay Senköy , 900 m, 13.4.2009, Brachat & Meybohm (9)" (cAss) .
D e s c r i p t i o n: Body length 2.2-2.6 mm. Habitus as in Fig. 53 View Figs 53-61 . Coloration: whole body uniformly reddish-yellow; legs yellowish.
Head approximately as long as wide ( Fig. 54 View Figs 53-61 ); punctation extremely fine, barely noticeable; surface with very shallow microreticulation. Eyes extremely reduced, rudiments barely visible, subequal to protarsomere IV in cross-section or even smaller. Antennae distinctly incrassate apically ( Fig. 55 View Figs 53-61 ).
Pronotum weakly transverse, approximately 1.05 times as wide as long and 1.1 times as wide as head ( Fig. 54 View Figs 53-61 ); punctation extremely fine, barely noticeable; microreticulation slightly more distinct than that of head.
Elytra with distinct sexual dimorphism, 0.55-0.60 times as long as pronotum ( Fig. 54 View Figs 53-61 ). Hind wings completely reduced.
Abdomen slightly wider than elytra ( Fig. 53 View Figs 53-61 ); punctation sparse and very fine; microsculpture shallow, but distinct; tergite VII with sexual dimorphism; posterior margin of tergite VII without palisade fringe.
Ƌ (with fully developed secondary sexual characters): elytra with rather pronounced sutural carinae extending from apex of scutellum to posterior elytral margin, punctation somewhat granulose ( Fig. 54 View Figs 53-61 ); tergite VII posteriorly with pair of weakly pronounced carinae of almost 2/5 the length of tergite ( Fig. 56 View Figs 53-61 ); posterior margin of tergite VIII weakly concave in the middle; posterior margin of sternite VIII convex; median lobe of aedeagus approximately 0.26 mm long (measured from apex of ventral process to base) ( Fig. 59 View Figs 53-61 ); apical lobe of paramere as in Fig. 60 View Figs 53-61 .
♀: elytra unmodified, with very fine punctation; tergite VIII with weakly convex poste-
rior margin ( Fig. 58 View Figs 53-61 ); posterior margin of sternite VIII broadly convex ( Fig. 57 View Figs 53-61 ); spermatheca as in Fig. 61. View Figs 53-61
E t y m o l o g y: The specific epithet (Latin, adjective) alludes to the presence of pronounced sutural carinae on the male elytra.
I n t r a s p e c i f i c v a r i a t i o n: In the male paratype, the sutural carinae are very weakly pronounced and the carinae on the abdominal tergite VII are practically obsolete.
C o m p a r a t i v e n o t e s a n d s y s t e m a t i c s: Basedonthesimilarmorphology of the aedeagus and the spermatheca, as well as on the similar external characters, G. carinipennis is evidently closely related to G. seleucica , which was collected in localities very close to the type locality of G. carinipennis . The new species is distinguished from G. seleucica by the even smaller eye rudiments ( G. seleucica : larger than protarsomere IV in cross-section), the pronounced modifications of the male elytra ( G. seleucica : unmodified), the presence of a pair of carinae on the male tergite VII (absent in G. seleucica ), and the larger median lobe of the aedeagus ( G. seleucica : 0.30-0.32 mm). For illustrations of G. seleucica see PACE (1983b) and ASSING (2004a).
The presence of carinae on the male abdominal tergite VII of G. carinipennis and its evidently close relationship to G. seleucica once again confirms that the absence of such carinae in the latter is in fact a reduction. Based on the similar morphology of the primary sexual characters, G. scheerpeltziana (FAGEL 1966) , too, is closely related to G. carinipennis and G. seleucica and should likewise be attributed to the subgenus Sibiota CASEY 1906 .
D i s t r i b u t i o n a n d b i o n o m i c s: This species is known only from two localities in southern Hatay (=Antakya) province, central southern Anatolia. The type specimens were collected by sifting leaf litter and grass beneath shrubs at altitudes of 730 and 900 m (MEYBOHM pers. comm.).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.