Malaisdius ruficeps ( Scheerpeltz, 1965 ) Brunke, Adam James, 2023
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2023.864.2093 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D47B6B04-B2AD-4FDD-B7C4-B71CA6A5BB84 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7872294 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6C38C875-FFBC-5B5A-FE32-FEFEE0FDFC05 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Malaisdius ruficeps ( Scheerpeltz, 1965 ) |
status |
comb. nov. |
Malaisdius ruficeps ( Scheerpeltz, 1965) comb. nov.
Figs 2A View Fig , 5A View Fig , 6A–E View Fig , 7D View Fig
Quedius (Microsaurus) ruficeps Scheerpeltz, 1965: 286 View in CoL .
Diagnosis
Within the genus, M. ruficeps comb. nov. is easily distinguished from M. smetanai gen. et sp. nov. by the strikingly bicolored body ( Fig. 2A View Fig ).
Type material
Holotype
MYANMAR – Kachin State • ♂; “ N.E. Burma , Kambaiti; 7000 ft.; 12/5 193; R. Malaise [printed label] / Holotypus [handwritten red label] / TYPUS Quedius ruficeps, O. Scheerpeltz [typed dark red-pink label] / Quedius (Microsaurus) ruficeps nov. spec., det. Scheerpeltz, 1974 [white label] / 6693 E91 [typed blue label] / NHRS-JLKB 000021051 [identifier]”; NHRS.
Paratypes
MYANMAR – Kachin State • 1 ♀; “[card with female symbol] / N.E. Burma , Kambaiti; 2000 m; 24/5.1934; Malaise [typed label] /Schwedisch Indian-Burma Expedition 1934 [typed label] /ex. coll. Scheerpeltz [typed blue label] / Allotypus [handwritten red label] / TYPUS Quedius ruficeps, O. Scheerpeltz [typed dark red-pink label] / ruficeps Schp [handwritten pink card]; NHW • 1 ♀; “[card with female symbol] / N.E. Burma , Kambaiti; 7000 ft.; 28/5 1934; R. Malaise [printed label] / Schwedisch Indian-Burma Expedition 1934 [typed label] /ex. coll. Scheerpeltz [typed blue label] / COTYPUS Quedius ruficeps O. Scheerpeltz [pink label]”; NHW • 1 ♂; “ N.E. Burma , Kambaiti; 2000 m; 25/5.1934; Malaise [typed label] / COTYPUS Quedius ruficeps O. Scheerpeltz [pink label] / 6694 E91 [typed blue label] / NHRS-JLKB 000021052 [identifier] / ruficeps Scheer [large folded label]”; NHRS .
Redescription
Head and pronotum pale orange-red, sharply contrasting with dark, vaguely bluish elytra and abdomen, scutellum very dark red, abdomen with iridescent reflection, antennomeres 1–4 pale, yellow, antennomeres 5–11 darker, brown to dark brown, becoming darker toward apex of antenna, legs entirely pale, yellow, palpi entirely pale, yellow. Body length (minus abdomen): 3.8–4.3 mm. Head slightly wider than long (1.12–1.15), with posterior angles absent; neck varying from moderately wide to narrow, creating an impression of a more elongate head; eyes large and clearly protruding from lateral head outline, tempora shorter than eyes (0.4–0.6); temporal puncture much closer to eye margin than hind margin of head; surface of head with extremely fine and superficial microsculpture of dense transverse waves. Antennae long, all segments longer than wide except 8–10, which are weakly transverse and slightly asymmetrical. Pronotum strongly convex, about as wide as long to distinctly wider than long (1.20), slightly explanate, punctures arranged as in generic description, microsculpture similar to that on head. Scutellum impunctate. Elytra at base slightly broader than pronotum, at middle and sides distinctly longer than pronotum at midline; disc without microsculpture, punctures sparsely and irregularly spaced, deeply impressed and foveate. Wings fully developed. Abdomen with tergite VII with palisade fringe; punctation as in generic description; tergites with extremely fine microsculpture of transverse waves.
Male
Sternite VIII with distinct but shallow emargination that is about 3.0 × as wide as long; sternite IX with long, asymmetrical basal part, most of disc setose, narrowing to asymmetrically rounded and entire apex; tergite X weakly narrowed to truncate and loosely crenulate apex, projections bearing setae; median lobe and paramere asymmetrical; median lobe in ventral view with apical third delimited by slight constriction, narrowed to rounded acute apex, with one lateral and one median fin-like tooth ( Fig. 6A–B View Fig ); median lobe in lateral view with narrowed apical part distad of emargination, this part with a tooth corresponding to the lateral tooth in ventral view, median tooth clearly visible ( Fig. 6C View Fig ); in the alternate lateral view, median lobe with apical part appearing broader and median tooth less visible ( Fig. 6D View Fig ); paramere broad and subparallel over much of its length, narrowing into a finger-like lobe, with a small lateral bulge, apex with four pairs of small setae, peg setae absent ( Fig. 6E View Fig ).
Female
Tergite X ( Fig. 7D View Fig ) nearly oval in shape, narrowed to moderately wide and slightly acuminate apex, disc with distinct oval impression, apex with pair of very long setae.
Distribution
Known only from the type locality in Myanmar (Kachin).
Remarks
One of the female paratypes is slightly paler than the other individuals, the antennae appear narrower, with antennomeres 7–10 weakly transverse, and the elytra appear vaguely narrower. However, this is considered to be intraspecific variation.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Malaisdius ruficeps ( Scheerpeltz, 1965 )
Brunke, Adam James 2023 |
Quedius (Microsaurus) ruficeps Scheerpeltz, 1965: 286
Scheerpeltz O. 1965: 286 |