Myzininae, Ashmead, 1899
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5154.2.3 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:49114F54-2FE8-4F8E-9202-B924E095664A |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6646971 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6C2787EE-AD1E-FFA4-12CB-2B90FA70F9D8 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Myzininae |
status |
|
Key to all the species of the subfamily Myzininae from China (excluding the genus Mesa )
♀♀
1. CM (R 1 vein always detached from the wing border) and CSM I–III of fore wing normal, not fused together ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1–8 ); pterostigma obsolete ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1–8 ); T6 ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 1–8 ) more and less punctate....................................................... 2
- CM and CSM III of fore wing fused together into the CPM, and CSM I–II present, the second always petiolate ( Fig. 63 View FIGURES 63–70 ); pterostigma present ( Fig. 63 View FIGURES 63–70 ); T6 ( Fig. 68 View FIGURES 63–70 ) quite smooth and mostly impunctate.................................... 6
2. Anterior surface of mesopleuron concave; head square ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 16–24 ), posterior corner more or less protruding backward.........................................................................................3 ( Hylomesa Krombein )
- Anterior surface of mesopleuron flat; head not square, posterior corner not protruding backward.............................................................................................. Mesa Saussure (see Liao et al. 2021)
3. Vertex ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1–8 ) close to posterior ocelli with dense punctures and close to occipital carina with sparse punctures; dorsum of propodeum ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 1–8 ) largely and irregularly punctate on horizontal surface............ H. punctata Liao, Chen & Li , sp. nov.
- Vertex ( Figs 10 View FIGURES 9–15 , 18 View FIGURES 16–24 ) near posterior ocelli with few sparse punctures, near occipital carina mostly impunctate; dorsum of propodeum ( Fig. 12 View FIGURES 9–15 ) largely impunctate on horizontal surface...................................................... 4
4. Head ( Fig. 25 View FIGURES 25–36 ) wholly black; propodeum ( Fig. 31 View FIGURES 25–36 ) with narrow median groove, base of groove almost as wide as apex..................................................................................... H. taiwana Tsuneki, 1986
- Head ( Figs 9 View FIGURES 9–15 , 16 View FIGURES 16–24 ) mostly red, propodeum ( Figs 12 View FIGURES 9–15 , 22 View FIGURES 16–24 ) with broad median groove, base of groove much wider than apex... 5
5. Ventral surface of hind femur ( Fig. 13 View FIGURES 9–15 ) medially with long acute prominence; anterior ocellus closer to occiput than to apex of antennal tubercle ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 9–15 ).......................................................... H. bakeri Krombein, 1968
- Ventral surface of hind femur ( Fig. 21 View FIGURES 16–24 ) medially with short obtuse prominence; anterior ocellus closer to apex of antennal tubercle than to occiput ( Fig. 18 View FIGURES 16–24 )...................................................... H. longiceps ( Turner, 1918)
6. Pam and Pal always 6- and 4- segmented, respectively; ventral surface of the 2 nd fore tarsomere with row of dense short whitish bristles at apex ( Fig. 29 View FIGURES 25–36 in Boni Bartalccui, 2004b)............................................... 7 ( Meria Illiger )
- Pam and Pal always more or less reduced; fore tibia and tarsus without dense short bristles (Fig. 284 in Boni Bartalccui, 2004b)............................................................................................. 11
7. Dorsum of propodeum largely striate laterally, medially with numerous deep punctures; lateral light spots on T2–T4 very large, the distance between two lateral spots less than the length of the spot (Fig. 127 in Boni Bartalccui, 2011a)............................................................................................ M. aurantiaca (Guérin, 1837)
- Dorsum of propodeum basally striate laterally, medially largely smooth ( Fig. 76 View FIGURES 71–79 ); lateral light spots on T2–T4 or T2–T3 comparatively smaller ( Fig. 77 View FIGURES 71–79 ), distance between two lateral spots more than or at least equal to the length of the spot........ 8
8. Head square, as high as wide in frontal view, elongated behind eyes....................... M. dorsalis ( Fabricius, 1804)
- Head distinctly wider than high in frontal view ( Figs 65 View FIGURES 63–70 , 73 View FIGURES 71–79 ), rounded behind eyes................................. 9
9. Head dark red; distance between two lateral spots on T2–T4 equal to the length of the spot................................................................................................. M. askhabadensis Radoszkowski, 1886
- Head dark brown to black; distance between two lateral spots on T2–T4 much greater than the length of the spot ( Figs 68 View FIGURES 63–70 , 77 View FIGURES 71–79 ) .................................................................................................. 10
10. Anterior margin of clypeus straight ( Fig. 65 View FIGURES 63–70 ); T1 ( Fig. 68 View FIGURES 63–70 ) subapically with a row of punctures and medially absent, forming incomplete groove................................................................ M. discussa Guiglia, 1973
- Anterior margin of clypeus rounded ( Fig. 73 View FIGURES 71–79 ); T1 ( Fig. 77 View FIGURES 71–79 ) subapically with a row of punctures, forming complete groove............................................................................ M. sanguinicollis Morawitz, 1893
11. Scape with a stripe of densely packed punctures bearing long setae, these setae as long as scape; T6 without subapical groove............................................................. Poecilotiphia brevicauda kaszabi ( Guiglia, 1965)
- Scape with sparser punctures, not forming a stripe, setae shorter than scape; T6 subapically with a row of punctures medially absent, forming incomplete groove......................................... Komarowia mongolina ( Guiglia, 1965)
♂♂
1. Hypostomal carina directed laterally toward outer mandibular condyle ( Fig. 27 View FIGURES 25–36 ); length of S7 0.4–0.5× length of T7 ( Fig. 36 View FIGURES 25–36 ) in lateral view........................................................................................ 2
- Hypostomal carina not directed laterally, still reaching inner mandibular condyle ( Fig. 74 View FIGURES 71–79 ); length of S7 more than half of T7 ( Fig. 50 View FIGURES 44–50 ) in lateral view................................................................................ 5
2. Hind coxa carinate along dorsal margin; T1 ( Fig. 34 View FIGURES 25–36 ) anteriorly carinate........................3 ( Hylomesa Krombein )
- Hind coxa not carinate along dorsal margin; T1 anteriorly not carinate............... Mesa Saussure (see Liao et al. 2021)
3. Head wholly black; anterior two-thirds of pronotum ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 25–36 ) with transverse grooves and posterior third with a few sparse minute punctures................................................................. H. taiwana Tsuneki, 1986
- Head usually red; pronotum sparsely punctate or densely punctate in a few transverse grooves........................ 4
4. Pronotum anteriorly moderately carinate, with sparse punctures............................ H. bakeri Krombein, 1968
- Pronotum anteriorly strongly carinate, with weak to strong dense punctures in a few transverse grooves................................................................................................ H. longiceps ( Turner, 1918)
5. Inner margin of eye with deep notch ( Figs 45 View FIGURES 44–50 , 58 View FIGURES 57–62 ); T7 ( Fig. 49 View FIGURES 44–50 ) with deep notch........................................................................................................................... 6 ( Meria Illiger )
- Inner margin of eye lightly bent or almost straight ( Figs 38 View FIGURES 37–43 , 82 View FIGURES 80–85 ), without deep notch; T7 ( Figs 43 View FIGURES 37–43 , 85 View FIGURES 80–85 ) with comparatively shallow notch.......................................................................................... 10
6. Pronotal transverse carina ( Fig. 53 View FIGURES 51–56 ) anteriorly complete and not absent; lateral side of pronotum ( Fig. 54 View FIGURES 51–56 ) antero-ventrally densely punctate, without striae; ventral surface of mid femur with sparse punctures and setae...................................................................................................... M. dorsalis ( Fabricius, 1804)
- Pronotal transverse carina anteriorly present and more or less absent ( Fig. 46 View FIGURES 44–50 ); lateral side of pronotum ( Fig. 47 View FIGURES 44–50 ) antero-ventrally densely strio-punctate or striate; ventral surface of mid femur smooth, without punctures nor setae................ 7
7. T3–T5 ( Fig. 48 View FIGURES 44–50 ) wholly with dense punctures; clypeus wholly with dense punctures ( Fig. 45 View FIGURES 44–50 ).. M. aurantiaca (Guérin, 1837)
- T3–T5 ( Fig. 69 View FIGURES 63–70 ) basally with dense or sparse punctures, apically impunctate and smooth; clypeus with moderate to sparse punctures ( Fig. 58 View FIGURES 57–62 ).................................................................................... 8
8. T7 ( Fig. 79 View FIGURES 71–79 ) with dense deep punctures; tipped lobes of T7 ( Fig. 79 View FIGURES 71–79 ) pointed............ M. sanguinicollis Morawitz, 1890
- T7 ( Fig. 62 View FIGURES 57–62 , 70 View FIGURES 63–70 ) with sparse shallow punctures; tipped lobes of T7 ( Fig. 62 View FIGURES 57–62 , 70 View FIGURES 63–70 ) rounded............................. 9
9. Dorsum of pronotum ( Figs 59 View FIGURES 57–62 ) anteriorly with dense punctures, posteriorly with moderate punctures; T3–T5 ( Fig. 61 View FIGURES 57–62 ) basally with large dense punctures................................................ M. askhabadensis Radoszkowski, 1886
- Dorsum of pronotum ( Fig. 67 View FIGURES 63–70 ) wholly with sparse punctures; T3–T5 ( Fig. 69 View FIGURES 63–70 ) basally with sparse and comparatively smaller punctures........................................................................ M. discussa Guiglia, 1973
10. Ocelli conspicuously enlarged, posterior ocelli distinctly convex in frontal view ( Fig. 38 View FIGURES 37–43 ); frons without smooth subtriangular area ( Fig. 39 View FIGURES 37–43 ); T7 ( Fig. 43 View FIGURES 37–43 ) with deep punctures, apex smooth and impunctate....... Komarowia mongolina ( Guiglia, 1965)
- Ocelli normal, posterior ocelli not convex in frontal view ( Fig. 81 View FIGURES 80–85 ); frons with smooth subtriangular area corresponding to anterior ocellus ( Fig. 82 View FIGURES 80–85 ); lateral side of T7 ( Fig. 85 View FIGURES 80–85 ) densely punctate, medially smooth and impunctate.............................................................................. Poecilotiphia brevicauda kaszabi ( Guiglia, 1965)
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.