Eogmelina prisca, Copilaş-Ciocianu & Ionesi, 2024
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1163/18759866-BJA10061 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13951589 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6705878F-647C-FFC5-FF1E-FB2E252BFD6A |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Eogmelina prisca |
status |
gen. et sp. nov. |
† Eogmelina prisca View in CoL gen. et sp. nov. ( fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 )
LSID urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:AFE20C61-1FEB -4C09-83B5-C57351542214
Type material. Holotype: male (inventory No. 8241 , Vlădiceni quarry), 14.8 mm, lateral impression ( fig. 6A View FIGURE 6 ). GoogleMaps Paratype: male (inventory No. 8242 , Iași City), 11.8 mm, dorso-lateral impression ( fig. 6B View FIGURE 6 ). GoogleMaps Additional material: disarticulated remains from an individual of unknown sex (inventory No. 8243 , Vlădiceni quarry), consisting of last two pereonites, al pleonites, and pereopod bases 5–7, lateral impression ( fig. 6C View FIGURE 6 ).
Type locality and age. Vlădiceni quarry (47.13442 N, 27.65734 E), via Open Cryptomactra Formation GoogleMaps , Tortonian GoogleMaps international stage/ Bessarabian GoogleMaps regional stage, ca. 10.5 Ma ( fig. 1C View FIGURE 1 ).
Etymology. The specific epithet comes from Latin prisca meaning ancient, in reference to its lack of armature, which is considered a plesiomorphic state.
Diagnosis. See diagnosis for E. moldavica gen. et. sp. nov.
General description. Body. Relatively large and robust gammarid (up to 15 mm). Body smooth, without dorsal or lateral projections. Head length subequal to the combined length of the following two pereonites, lacking rostrum, antennal sinuses superficial, of similar depth. Coxal plates 1–3 taller than wide, taller than the corresponding tergal segments. Coxal plate 4 as tall as wide, slightly taller than corresponding tergal segment. Epimere 1 distal margin rounded, epimeres 2–3 disto-posterior corner pointed. Urosomites free and flat, devoid of tubercles or spines. Telson longer than broad, lobes oval, cleft all the way. Antennae. Antenna 1 peduncle robust and short, subequal to head length, not reaching the distal end of the 4th peduncular article of antenna 2. Peduncular segment 1 subequal to the combined length of segments 2 + 3. Antenna 2 peduncle well developed, longer than head. Gnathopods. Propodi of both gnathopods rectangular, similar in length and shape, moderately developed (0.1 of body length), palm length subequal to posterior margin. Pereopods. Pereopods 3–4 subequal in length and of similar construction, carpus linear, longer than broad, without signs of expansion. Pereopods 5–7 well developed and robust (at least 0.4 of body length), bases taller than broad, without posterior lobes, propodi subequal to carpi, dactyli moderately developed and relatively straight. Uropods. Uropod 1 rami subequal, shorter than peduncle, of senticaudatan type. Uropod 2 poorly visible, but shorter than uropod 1. Uropod 3 well developed Downloaded(0.16 from of Brill. body com 06/21 length/2024), 06: reach-25:54PM. This ing is well an open beyond access the article distal distributed end of under uropod the 1, terms both rami lanceolate longer than peduncle, endopod reaching 0.9 exopod length. Sexual dimorphism. Female unknown.
Access
Systematic remarks. The monophyly of Egomelina gen. nov. is weakly supported in ML and BA analyses, while the genus is paraphyletic in MP analyses. This is very likely due to several missing characters for E. prisca gen nov. et sp. nov. due to the incompletely preserved antennae. However, both species are closer to each other in phenetic and morphometric analyses than to the other fossil taxa. As such, we prefer to take a conservative stance and provisionally assign both species to the same genus.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |