Pyrrhalta viridipennis Kimoto, 1981

Lee, Chi-Feng & Bezdek, Jan, 2021, Revision of the genera Xanthogaleruca Laboissiere, 1932 and Pyrrhalta Joannis, 1865 (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Galerucinae) of Taiwan, with type designation of Galerucella lineatipes Takei, ZooKeys 1039, pp. 1-108 : 1

publication ID

https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1039.64740

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:3487C357-0FAC-4907-A5C0-C0A0C801C6E3

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/663C33A4-F197-5A4D-9C63-02A9275263FD

treatment provided by

ZooKeys by Pensoft

scientific name

Pyrrhalta viridipennis Kimoto, 1981
status

 

Pyrrhalta viridipennis Kimoto, 1981 Figs 11D-F View Figure 11 , 13C, D View Figure 13 , 14 View Figure 14

Pyrrhalta viridipennis Kimoto, 1981: 2; Kimoto and Chu 1996: 57; Kimoto and Takizawa 1997: 301 (key), 374; Beenen 2010: 453 (catalogue); Xue and Yang 2010: 132 (catalogue); Yang et al. 2015: 122 (catalogue).

Types.

Holotype ♂ (OMNH, by original designation): "NANSHANCHI [南山溪] / TAIWAN / 21. VII. 1974 / Y. KIYOYAMA [p, y] // Pyrrhalta / Pyrrhalta viridipennis / Kimoto, n. sp. [h, w] // HOLOTYPE [p, r] // PHOTO [p, r]". Paratype. 1 ♂ (KMNH): "(Taiwan) [p] / Sungan [松安] / Miaoli [h] Hsien [p, w] // 10.IV.1967 [h] / B. S. Chang [p, w] // Pyrrhalta / Pyrrhalta viridipennis / Kimoto, n. sp. [h, w] // Det. S. Kimoto, 19 [p, w] // PARATYPE [p, b]".

Other material.

Taiwan. Chiayi: 1♂, 1♀ (TARI), Alishan (阿里山), 5-9.VIII.1981, leg. L. Y. Chou & S. C. Lin ; Kaohsiung: 1♂ (TARI), Kuanshanyakou (關山啞口), 30.VII.2015, leg. C.-F. Lee ; 1♂, 1♀ (TARI), Tengchih (藤枝), 7.IX.2012, leg. W.-C. Liao ; 2♂, 5♀ (TARI), same but with “10.VIII.2013”; 1♀ (TARI), same but with “27.IX.2013”; 2♂, 4♀ (TARI), same but with “5.X.2013”; 4♂, 1♀ (TARI), same locality, 4.VIII.2012, leg. J.-C. Chen ; 2♂, 2♀ (TARI), same locality, 30.VIII.2014, leg. B.-X. Guo ; 2♀ (TARI), Tsuyunshan (出雲山), 25.IV.1990, leg. C. C. Chiang ; Nantou: 1♀ (NMNS), Huishun (惠蓀), 3.VII.1991, leg. C. S. Lin ; 1♂ (NMNS), Shanlinchi (杉林溪), 11.V.1990, leg. C. C. Chiang ; 2♀ (TARI), Tsuifeng (翠峰), 1-3.VIII.1981, leg. T. Lin & W. S. Tang ; 1♂, 1♀ (TARI), same locality, 1-3.IX.1982, leg. L. Y. Chou & K. C. Chou ; 1♂, 2♀ (TARI), same locality, 12-14.IX.1984, leg. K. S. Lin & S. C. Lin ; Pingtung: 1♂, 1♀ (TARI), Ali (阿禮), 30.V.2014, leg. J.-C. Chen ; Taichung: 1♂, 1♀ (NHMUK), Basianshan National Forest Recreation Area (八仙山國家森林遊樂區), 27.V.2007, leg. G. Martin & D. L. J. Quicke ; 2♀ (TARI), Tahsuehshan (大雪山), 21.IV.2010, leg. C.-F. Lee ; Taipei: 1♂, 1♀ (TARI), Shihfen (十分), 23.V.2016, leg. J.-C. Chen ; 1♂ (TARI), Yingtzuling (鶯子嶺), 21.VI.2016, leg. Y.-L. Lin ; Taitung: 3♂ (TARI), Hsiangyang (向陽), 2.VII.2009, leg. S.-F. Yu ; 8♂, 5♀ (TARI), same but with "leg. M.-H. Tsou"; 1♀ (TARI), same locality, 22.XII.2013, leg. W.-C. Liao ; 1♂ (TARI), Hsiangyangshan (向陽山), 20.VI.2014, leg. J.-C. Chen.

Redescription.

Length 5.3-7.8 mm, width 2.3-3.5 mm. Body color (Fig. 11D-F View Figure 11 ) yellowish brown; antenna reddish brown; elytra green but with wide yellow stripe along lateral margin, apical area more or less yellowish brown. Eyes small, interocular space 2.67-2.75 × diameter of eye. Antennae filiform in males (Fig. 14A View Figure 14 ), length ratios of antennomeres I-XI 1.0: 0.7: 1.2: 1.1: 1.0: 1.0: 0.9: 0.9: 0.8: 0.7: 0.9, length to width ratios of antennomeres I-XI 2.6: 2.9: 4.5: 3.9: 3.7: 3.7: 3.4: 3.5: 3.1: 3.3: 4.4; similar in females (Fig. 14B View Figure 14 ), length ratios of antennomeres I-XI 1.0: 0.5: 0.9: 0.9: 0.9: 0.8: 0.8: 0.7: 0.7: 0.6: 0.8, length to width ratios of antennomeres I-XI 2.8: 2.1: 3.6: 4.0: 4.0: 3.6: 3.7: 3.2: 3.1: 2.9: 3.7. Pronotum and elytra convex. Pronotum 1.9-2.0 × wider than long, disc with reticulate microsculpture; with dense, coarse punctures, and short pubescence, with median longitudinal and lateral depressions; lateral margins rounded, widest at middle, apical and basal margin slightly concave; anterior and posterior setiferous punctures slightly erect. Elytra elongate and broad, parallel-sided, 1.6-1.7 × longer than wide; disc rough, with dense, fine punctures, and short pubescence. Apical spur of tibia of middle leg small and curved (Fig. 14M View Figure 14 ), and tarsomere I not modified in males. Aedeagus (Fig. 14C, D View Figure 14 ) slender in dorsal view, 7.9 × longer than wide, asymmetric, curved at apical 1/7, apically narrowed, apex broadly rounded; ostium large, not covered by membrane; straight but strongly curved near base in lateral view, slightly curved near apex, apex narrowly rounded; two endophallic sclerites elongate, primary sclerite longer and 0.6 × as long as aedeagus, apex with several fine teeth; secondary sclerite small, 0.4 × as long as the longer sclerite. Only apices of gonocoxae (Fig. 14J View Figure 14 ) sclerotized, elongate, with several short setae near apex, and four long setae near apex. Ventrite VIII (Fig. 14I View Figure 14 ) well sclerotized, strongly broadened near apex, outer sides strongly curved, several short setae along apical margin and bearing cluster of long setae medially, spiculum long. Receptacle of spermatheca (Fig. 14N View Figure 14 ) very swollen; pump short and strongly curved; sclerotized proximal spermathecal duct wide and short. Apical margin of abdominal ventrite V moderately concave medially, with deep, indistinctly margined depression at middle in males (Fig. 14L View Figure 14 ); slightly concave, with median, longitudinal internal ridge in females (Fig. 14K View Figure 14 ).

Variation.

The apex of the aedeagus is variable among populations; more slender in north and central Taiwan (Fig. 14E, F View Figure 14 ); recurved in southeast Taiwan (Fig. 14G, H View Figure 14 ).

Host plant.

Larvae and adults feed on leaves of Rhododendron rubropilosum Hayata var. rubropilosum Hayata ( Ericaceae ) (Fig. 13E, F View Figure 13 ).

Biology.

The first author and Mr. Ta-Hsiang Lee collected one larva feeding on leaves April 20, 2010 in Tahsuehshan, central Taiwan (Fig. 13E View Figure 13 ). It was reared in the laboratory. The newly eclosed adult appeared May 20 (Fig. 13F View Figure 13 ).

Remarks.

Adults of P. viridipennis Kimoto and P. gressitti Kimoto are both characterized by the green elytra with longitudinal ridges. However, P. viridipennis differs from P. gressitti by the larger body sizes, 5.3-7.8 mm long (3.9-5.4 mm long in P. gressitti ), rough elytra with fine punctures (smooth and shining elytra with coarse punctures in P. gressitti ); curved apex of aedeagus and narrowly rounded apex of primary endophallic slerite with teeth (Fig. 14C, D View Figure 14 ) (recurved apex of aedeagus and broadly rounded apex of primary endophallic sclerite lacking teeth in P. gressitti (Fig. 6C, D View Figure 6 )); small and stout apical spur of tibia of middle leg in males (Fig. 14M View Figure 14 ) (slender apical spur of tibia of middle leg in males of P. viridipennis (Fig. 6F View Figure 6 )); and slightly concave apical margin of abdominal ventrite V with short internal ridge in females (Fig. 14L View Figure 14 ) (moderately concave apical margin of abdominal ventrite V in females of P. viridipennis (Fig. 6J View Figure 6 ))

Distribution.

The species is widespread at mid-altitudes (1,500-2,500 m) in central and southern Taiwan.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Chrysomelidae

Genus

Pyrrhalta

Loc

Pyrrhalta viridipennis Kimoto, 1981

Lee, Chi-Feng & Bezdek, Jan 2021
2021
Loc

Pyrrhalta viridipennis

Kimoto 1981
1981