Costanana obtusa, Domahovski & Cavichioli, 2023

Domahovski, Alexandre C. & Cavichioli, Rodney R., 2023, Eight new species of Costanana DeLong & Freytag (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Gyponini): taxonomic changes, key to males, and description of Metacostana gen. nov., European Journal of Taxonomy 889 (1), pp. 1-53 : 17-18

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2023.889.2245

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:52E11625-6E26-4E4F-8B15-05195087BAB4

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8271507

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6C9FE23A-E57D-440D-8C41-93B9E2934678

taxon LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:act:6C9FE23A-E57D-440D-8C41-93B9E2934678

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Costanana obtusa
status

sp. nov.

Costanana obtusa View in CoL sp. nov.

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:6C9FE23A-E57D-440D-8C41-93B9E2934678

Figs 7 View Fig , 12A–B View Fig

Diagnosis

Coloration ( Fig. 12A View Fig ) of head and pronotum brown with black maculae, forewing costal margin with broad light yellow macula on anterior third and large depigmented (white) macula on apical third. Style ( Fig. 7K View Fig ) with ventral dentiform process near base of blade; apex truncated. Aedeagus ( Fig. 7L–M View Fig ) without processes near base; shaft slender with pair of long filiform subapical processes directed basally, with one or two spurs near base; apex of shaft spatulate and rounded.

Etymology

The species epithet ‘ obtusa ’ refers to the unusual apex of the style being truncated.

Material examined

Holotype BRAZIL • ♂; “Brasil, Bahia, \ Encruzilhada \ XII.1980 \ M. Alvarenga ”; DZUP 215492 View Materials .

Description

Male

MEASUREMENTS. Holotype male: total length 6.8 mm.

COLORATION. Dorsal portion of head and thorax brown ( Figs 7A, C View Fig , 12A View Fig ); ventral portion yellow ( Figs 7B–C View Fig , 12B View Fig ). Crown ( Fig. 7A View Fig ) almost completely black, except median line and posterior margin brown; pair of rounded black spots behind ocelli, near posterior margin; eyes and ocelli red. Pronotum ( Fig. 7A View Fig ) with black irregular maculae near anterior margin; lateral margins yellow. Face ( Fig. 7B View Fig ) with frons brownish. Forewing ( Fig. 7D View Fig ) with large triangular light yellow macula on anterior half of costal margin and a large rounded depigmented (white) macula at level of outer anteapical cell, remaining portion of costal cell, apical cells, apex of clavus and appendix dark brown; apical margin yellow-brown.

STRUCTURE. Head in dorsal view ( Fig. 7A View Fig ): median length of crown as long as interocular width; transocular width of head 8.2 tenths humeral width of pronotum; in lateral view ( Fig. 7C View Fig ), with anterior margin thick, with 7–8 well developed carinae. Forewing ( Fig. 7D View Fig ) inner discal cell open, m-cu 2 crossvein absent; apex broadly rounded. Other characteristics as in the generic description.

MALE TERMINALIA. Sternite VIII ( Fig. 7E View Fig ) 1.1× as long as wide; lateral margins excavated at base, forming a triangular projection; apex rounded. Valve ( Fig. 7F View Fig ) 2.2× as wide as long; posterior margin almost straight and weakly emarginated medially. Pygofer ( Fig. 7G View Fig ), in lateral view, 1.8× as long as maximum height; basodorsal process present but weakly developed; ventral margin with rounded protrusion near midlength; posterodorsal and ventral margins rounded; external surface near ventral margin with short filiform setae; macrosetae distributed on posterior half; apex broadly rounded. Subgenital plate ( Fig. 7G View Fig ), in lateral view, slightly surpassing half length of pygofer; in ventral view ( Fig. 7H View Fig ), 3.5× as long as wide; inner margin straight; external margin slightly rounded on basal half; ventral surface and external margin with long filiform setae; apex tapered and weakly sclerotized. Connective ( Fig. 7I View Fig ) approximately linear; arms not produced laterally; stalk longer than maximum width of arms, widened apically; median keel weakly developed. Style ( Fig. 7J View Fig ), in dorsal view, with outer lobe reduced and subtruncated; in lateral view ( Fig. 7K View Fig ), blade broadened medially; ventral margin not serrated, with dentiform process near base of blade; apex truncated. Aedeagus ( Fig. 7L–M View Fig ) preatrium not developed; dorsal apodeme strongly elongated laterally, forming divergent and truncated apices; shaft slender, curved dorsally; pair of long filiform subapical processes directed basally, with one or two spurs near base; apex spatulate and rounded.

Female

Unknown.

Remarks

Costanana obtusa sp. nov. is most similar to C. piraquarensis sp. nov. in having a similar color pattern ( Fig.12A–D View Fig ), especially the pair of large maculae on the costal margin of the forewing ( Figs 7D View Fig , 8D View Fig ) and the general shape of the pygofer, style, connective and aedeagus ( Figs 7G–M View Fig , 8G–M View Fig ). Costanana obtusa is separated from C. piraquarensis in having the following differences: (1) apex of pygofer rounded ( Fig. 7G View Fig ); (2) connective longer ( Fig. 7I View Fig ); (3) style with apex truncated ( Fig. 7K View Fig ); (4) aedeagal shaft slenderer ( Fig. 7L–M View Fig ); and (5) subapical pair of processes having one or two spurs near the base ( Fig. 7M View Fig ). Unfortunately the legs of the holotype are missing but, due to the distinctly different genitalia and the lack of importance for species delimitation of the morphology of the legs, we suppose this does not prejudge the description or future recognition of this species.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hemiptera

Family

Cicadellidae

Genus

Costanana

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF