Amara harpalina LeConte, 1855
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.245.3416 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:68FE3835-2401-43A7-96E2-CF26532F7A60 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/65DCDDFE-CD91-14CC-A6A3-054BE964D233 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Amara harpalina LeConte, 1855 |
status |
|
Amara harpalina LeConte, 1855: 355. Type locality: "Santa Fe [Santa Fe County], New Mexico" (original citation). Two syntypes [2 ♀ originally cited] in MCZ [# 5690].
Celia acutangula Putzeys, 1866b: 194. Type locality: «États-Unis» (original citation). Holotype [by monotypy] (♂) in MHNP (collection Chaudoir). Synonymy established by Horn (1892b: 40).
Celia shantzi Casey, 1918: 285. Type locality: "Akron [Washington County], Colorado" (original citation). Lectotype [as typus] (♀), designated by Hieke (1993: 140), in USNM [# 47225]. Synonymy established by Hieke (1993: 139). Etymology. The specific name was proposed for Homer Leroy Shantz [1876-1958], American botanist, professor and president of the University of Arizona.
Distribution.
This species is known from eastern Oregon (Baker County, USNM) to western South Dakota (Lawrence County, USNM), north to southeastern Montana (Powder River County, USNM), south to western Texas (Culberson County, CMNH) and central Arizona (Gila County, MCZ).
Records.
USA: AZ, CO, ID, MT, NM, OR, TX, UT, WY
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Amara harpalina LeConte, 1855
Bousquet, Yves 2012 |
Celia shantzi
Casey 1918 |
Celia acutangula
Putzeys 1866 |
Amara harpalina
LeConte 1855 |