Trachusa varia ( Olivier, 1789 )

Kasparek, Max, 2020, Revision of the Palaearctic Trachusa interrupta species complex (Apoidea: Anthidiini) with description of four new species, Zootaxa 4728 (1), pp. 1-48 : 39-41

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4728.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E59D3E8F-5C84-40F9-B59B-66E653982A0F

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/657CC410-924F-FFE7-7DDA-FC98FC29F943

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Trachusa varia ( Olivier, 1789 )
status

 

Trachusa varia ( Olivier, 1789) View in CoL stat. resurr.

( Figs 33 View FIGURE 33 , 39–41 View FIGURE 39 View FIGURE 40 View FIGURE 41 )

Apis rufipes Fabricius (1787: 303) ( Spain) View in CoL .—Synonymy by Warncke (1980, 1986).

Apis varia Olivier, 1789: 74 .—Replacement name for Apis rufipes View in CoL F., not Apis rufipes Fabricius, 1781 View in CoL = Megachile rufipes ( Fabricius, 1781) View in CoL .

Apis erythropus Fabricius, 1789 .—Replacement name for A. rufipes View in CoL F. ( Gmelin 1790: 278).

Apis fulvipes Fabricius, 1793 .—Ent. system., Vol. 2: 333 ( Spain).—Without referring to Olivier (1789), Fabricius (1793) repeated his description of A. rufipes View in CoL from 1787, but now under the name A. fulvipes .

Apis fulvipes Fabricius. —Listed by Fabricius (1804) without referring to Apis rufipes View in CoL .

Anthophora fulvipes ( Fabricius, 1787) View in CoL .—Listed by Illiger (1806), who did not examine material of this taxon but refers to Fabricius (1804).

Anthidium rufipes ( Fabricius, 1787) View in CoL .— Friese (1911).

Anthidium foliivolutor Ferton, 1921 View in CoL .—Ghazaouet (formerly Nemours), Algeria (male and female).

Anthidium interruptum Fabricius, 1787 View in CoL (partim).—Synonymy by Warncke (1980) after examination of the type material.

Material examined. Female. HOLOTYPE: Female ( NHMD). Original label ‘ fulvipes’. Additional label in the handwriting of K. Warncke “ Lectotypus Apis fulvipes (Warncke 1977) ”. Head absent as already mentioned by Warncke (1980).— PARALECTOTYPEs: 1♀ ( NHMD). ZUMC 00241548, red label ‘type’ and an additional red label in K. Warncke’s handwriting ‘ Paralectotypus Apis fulvipes (Warncke1977) ’.— 1♂ ( NHMD) ZUMC 00241547. ‘ A. fulvipes D. Vahl’. Red label ‘type’ and an additional red label in K. Warncke’s handwriting ‘ Paralectotypus Apis fulvipes (Warncke 1977) ’. All antennal segments available but badly damaged. Pinned through the head. This is the male of Apis rufipes in Fabricius’ collection.— Further material: SPAIN: 2♀ Melilla [Spanish enclave in Morocco] June 1949, B. Sincan leg., both Paraanthidium foliivolutor Mavromoustakis det. (cMAV).

Taxonomic note. Fabricius (1787) described Apis rufipes based on material collected in Spain. As the name was preoccupied, the following replacement names were suggested: Apis varia by Oliver (1789), Apis erythropus by Gmelin (1790) and Apis fulvipes by Fabricius (1793). Apis varia has priority. This is not the only case known where Johann Christian Fabricius described a homonym ( van der Vecht 1961).

Description. Female: Colour of all maculations red ( Fig. 39 View FIGURE 39 ); band along preoccipital ridge extending from lower gena to middle of vertex, and joining with maculation of paraocular area ( Figs 33 View FIGURE 33 , 39B View FIGURE 39 ); transversal stripe behind ocellus; scutum with anterolateral stripe; scutellum and axillae together with four red spots; all tergal bands uninterrupted; mid-femur with red stripe almost reaching distal end; inner side of hind tibia red ( Fig. 39C View FIGURE 39 ); pronotal lobe red.

Male ( Fig. 41 View FIGURE 41 ): Colour of all maculations yellow to rufous; bands on T1 and T2 interrupted, others uninterrupted ( Fig. 41B View FIGURE 41 ); scutum with narrow, hardly discernible rufous lateral stripe; scutellum and axillae black; rufous stripe of mid-femur reaching middle of femur; inner side of hind tibia black; pronotal lobe rufous.

Differential Diagnosis. Habitus and colouration pattern of the female similar to T. interrupta but all pale maculations red or reddish instead of bright yellow. Additionally, the female is distinguished from all other species of the complex by (1) a red band extending from the genae to the middle of the vertex along the preoccipital ridges; (2) red maculation of the paraocular areas merged with the bands along the preoccipital ridges, and (3) a transverse red band behind the ocelli ( Figs 33 View FIGURE 33 , 39 View FIGURE 39 , 40 View FIGURE 40 , 41 View FIGURE 41 ). The female is further distinguished from all other species of the complex by the uninterrupted band on T1, which has some rufous inclusion medially ( Fig. 39 View FIGURE 39 ).

The maculations of the male are yellow to rufous, hereby paler than in the female and closer to the other males of the complex. The hind femora are black with the distal one-thirds being reddish-yellow. A similar pattern only occurs in T. maghrebensis from Tunisia. Tergal bands are broad, bands on T1–T2 interrupted and band on T3 with a deep notch. A similar pattern has been found in one out of nine specimens of T. maghrebensis .

While the female is well characterised and can easily be identified by both colouration and colour pattern, the single more than 230 years old male is in bad condition and distinguishing morphological characters need to be examined.

Remarks. The description by Ferton (1921) of Anthidium foliivolutor largely matches the description given here. He particularly described the colour of the male maculae as yellow, and those of the female as red, thus confirming the colour dimorphism. The male in Felton’s (1921) material has the band on T1–T3 interrupted, whereas they are interrupted in the male in Fabricius’ collection only on T1–T2.

Given the great age of Fabricius’ type material (over 230 years old), it was considered whether colouration might have changed, possibly as a consequence of treatment e.g. with arsenic. While some change cannot be ruled out, the colour tone (red, ochreous, yellow) is well correlated with the colour design and the same unique combination of colour and colour design was found in material collected in the same region approximately 150 years later.

Distribution. Spain and North Africa. Fabricius (1787, 1793, 1804) gives Spain as the location where the type material was collected by Prof. Martin Vahl (1749–1804), who was a botanist who collected in Spain and northern Africa (e.g. Tunis). Information on the exact collecting site or on the travel itinerary was not available but it cannot be ruled out that the material actually came from northern Africa and not from Spain. Further material is available from Melilla, the Spanish enclave in Morocco, and the material of Ferton (1921) from Ghazaouet (formerly Nemours) in West Algeria can apparently also be attributed to this species.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hymenoptera

SuperFamily

Apoidea

Family

Megachilidae

Tribe

Anthidiini

Genus

Trachusa

Loc

Trachusa varia ( Olivier, 1789 )

Kasparek, Max 2020
2020
Loc

Apis erythropus

Gmelin, J. F. & von Linne, C. 1790: 278
1790
Loc

Apis varia

Olivier, G. A. 1789: 74
1789
Loc

Apis rufipes

Fabricius, J. C. 1787: 303
1787
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF