Longitarsus asperifoliarum
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1649/0010-065X(2000)054[0200:ROTLAG]2.0.CO;2 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/642E87B2-FFF5-FFAF-7FBE-5FA1FB80FDEB |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Longitarsus asperifoliarum |
status |
|
Key to Longitarsus asperifoliarum Species Group
1(2) Pronotal surface strongly shagreened, dull ----------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- L. tishechkini Konstantinov
1 9 Pronotal surface weakly shagreened, shiny --------------------------------------------------- 2
2(1) First antennomere with base darker than apex --------------------------------------------- 3
2 9 First antennomere with base as dark as apex ----------------------------------------------- 6
3(2) Tibiae yellow. Lateral margin of pronotum without denticle in front of middle ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- L. afghanicus Lopatin
3 9 Tibiae light brown or reddish ferrugineous. Lateral margin of pronotum with denticle in front of middle ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4
4(3) Last abdominal tergite of female with lateral microtrichia ( Fig. 16 View Figs ). Median lobe of aedeagus slender, apical part less convex in lateral view ( Figs. 53–60 View Figs ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- L. violentus Weise
4 9 Last abdominal tergite of female without lateral microtrichia ( Figs. 14– 15 View Figs ). Median lobe of aedeagus more robust, apical part more convex in lateral view ( Figs. 43, 45, 51 View Figs ) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5
5(4) Last abdominal tergite of female with few deep setiferous pores basally ( Fig. 14 View Figs ). Spermathecal duct basally pointed in direction opposite to receptacle making almost no loop away from receptacle, apically forming 2 extremely similar coils (Figs. 19–20). Apex of median lobe of aedeagus with wide but well developed denticle ( Figs. 43, 45, 47, 48 View Figs ) -------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- L. marguzoricus Konstantinov
5 9 Last abdominal tergite of female without deep setiferous pores basally ( Fig. 15 View Figs ). Spermathecal duct basally pointed in direction of receptacle making loop away from receptacle, apically forming irregular coils (Fig. 21). Apex of median lobe of aedeagus with poorly developed denticle ( Fig. 51 View Figs ). ---------------------------------------------------------------- L. violentoides Konstantinov
6(1) Elytral apex broadly rounded with well developed angle ( Fig. 8 View Figs ). Metatibial spur as long as third metatarsomere. Median lobe of aedeagus with apex forming almost no denticle, and lateral sides nearly straight ( Figs. 40, 41 View Figs ) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- L. hissaricus Lopatin
6 9 Elytral apex narrowly rounded without well developed angle ( Fig. 7 View Figs ). Metatibial spur smaller than third metatarsomere. Median lobe of aedeagus with apex forming moderately well developed denticle and lateral sides slightly constricted nearly in middle ( Figs. 33, 35, 37–39 View Figs ) ------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- L. asperifoliarum Weise
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.