Xenopholis werdingorum, Jansen, Martin, Álvarez, Lucindo Gonzales & Köhler, Gunther, 2009

Jansen, Martin, Álvarez, Lucindo Gonzales & Köhler, Gunther, 2009, Description of a new species of Xenopholis (Serpentes: Colubridae) from the Cerrado of Bolivia, with comments on Xenopholis scalaris in Bolivia, Zootaxa 2222, pp. 31-45 : 33-41

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.190108

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5670022

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/6221879C-FFC1-3902-E383-F966F101FE05

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Xenopholis werdingorum
status

sp. nov.

Xenopholis werdingorum sp. nov.

( Figs. 2–5 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4 View FIGURE 5 )

Holotype: MNKR 4700, adult female; Hacienda San Sebastián (S 16°21.676’, W 62°00.017’, 550 m; Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 ), Province of Ñuflo de Chávez, Department of Santa Cruz, Bolivia; collected about 2300 hours on 25 October 2006 by M. Jansen and A. Schulze. GoogleMaps

Paratypes: ZSM 5113/2005, adult female; old cattle post San Ignacio near San José de Chiquitos (“…verlassene Ranchogruppe San Ignacio…,”, Krieg 1931:71), Province of Chiquitos, Department of Santa Cruz, Bolivia; collected by the German Chaco Expedition, which was between 20 and 28 September 1926 in that area according to the narration of the expedition by Krieg (1931); MNKR 4701, adult female, same locality data as holotype, collected about 2055 hours on 3 December 2008 by A. Schulze. GoogleMaps

Etymology: The name werdingorum is a noun in the genitive case, proposed to honor the family Werding, owners of type locality Hacienda San Sebastián. Lutz Werding provided great hospitality and encouragement for our inventories of the flora and fauna on their property. Furthermore, the family Werding generously provided broad logistic and financial support for the building of a biological research station (Centro de Investigaciónes Ecológicas Chiquitos) on their grounds.

Diagnosis: The new species can be identified as a member of the genus Xenopholis by its characteristic vertebral morphology (see Boulenger (1896): Externally, the new species differs from all other species of Xenopholis and all members of Clelia by having a unique dorsal color pattern (dorsal and dorsolateral surfaces of head and body dark brown with an iridescent sheen, grading to yellowish orange laterally and onto venter). The new species can be distinguished from all other species of Xenopholis and all members of Clelia by the following combination of characters: (1) 19-19-17 dorsal scale rows; (2) 171–179 ventrals (mean 176, n = 3); (3) 38–40 subcaudals (mean 39, n = 3); (4) no apical pits on dorsal scales; (5) two to three supralabials in contact with the eye; (6) eye diameter 0.35 times the distance between the eye and the tip of the snout; (7) one anterior and two posterior temporals; (8) two prefrontals; (9) a narrow septum within the neural spine and perpendicular to its long axis, as seen in x-ray images ( Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 ).

Xenopholis werdingorum differs from X. scalaris (features of X. scalaris in parentheses) in color pattern (dirty brick red above, narrow black spots on the sides; Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 ); number of prefrontals (one prefrontal); shape of loreal (loreal as long as wide or only slightly longer); number of supralabials in contact with the eye (two); number of ventrals (127–146); dorsal scale rows at midbody (17-17-17); number of subcaudals (28–36); and vertebral morphology (no narrow septum within the neural spine visible in x-ray images, Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 ).

From X. undulatus , the new species is distinguished (features of X. undulatus in parentheses) in body color pattern (dorsal ground color yellowish, with a brown or black undulating band and lateral series of black spots; Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 ); coloration of head (dark streak behind the eye present; upper lip yellowish); and number of supralabials entering the eye (usually two, rarely three).

From the superficially similar species of the genus Clelia ( C. bicolor , C. clelia , C. equatoriana , C. errabunda , C. hussami , C. langeri , C. montana , C. plumbea , C. rustica , C. scytalina , and C. quimi ) the new species of Xenopholis differs (characters of Clelia in parentheses) by number of subcaudals (more than 43 in all species of Clelia ); number of ventrals in females (more than 192, except C. bicolor ); supralabials in contact with the eye (two); anterior temporals (usually two, rarely one in C. rustica and C. bicolor ; Fig. 10 View FIGURE 10 ); and eye diameter (0.5 times the distance between the eye and the tip of the snout).

Description of holotype: Adult female ( Figs. 2–4 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4 ), preserved in 70 % alcohol. Head little wider than neck; body long and diameter equal in all extensions; tail short relative to body, with conical tip; iris black and pupil round; nostril at anterior part of nasal scale; maxillary teeth aproximately 12, the last two grooved and separated from the others by a large diastema.

Measurements: SVL 338 mm; TL 52 mm; TTL 390 mm; head length 13.9 mm; height of head at level of parietals 4.9 mm; height of head at level of nostrils 3.0 mm; largest width at level of parietals 7.9 mm; width at level of nostrils 3.6 mm; diameter of orbit 1.6 mm, approximately 0.35 times the distance from eye to snout; diameter of body at level of neck 6.2 mm; diameter of body at level of midbody 10.0 mm; diameter of body one head length before cloaca 6.4 mm; diameter of base of tail 5.3 mm; diameter of middle of tail 4.0 mm; diameter of final part at level of last middorsocaudal scale 1.5 mm; length of conical tip of tail 1.8 mm; length of ultimate dorsal 0.9 mm; length of ultimate subcaudal 0.8 mm; proportions: TL/SVL: 0.15; head length/total length 0.36.

Pholidosis: Rostral wider than high; portion of tip of rostral visible from above less than length of suture between internasals; internasals wider than long (right internasal: width 1.8 mm, length 1.4 mm); prefrontals about as long as wide (right prefrontal: width 2.3 mm, length 2.2 mm); supraocular small (width 0.9 mm, length 1.3 mm); frontal irregularly heptagonal (width 3.7 mm, length 3.5 mm); nasal scales long (length 2.5 mm), in contact with loreal; preoculars 1/1, (right preocular: height 1.7 mm, length 1.2 mm); one loreal; 2/2 postoculars, lower postocular pentagonal and smaller than upper; supralabials 8/8; third to fifth supralabials in contact with eye; first supralabial triangular and smaller than others, third supralabial elongated posterodorsally at tip and reaching to eye; fourth supralabial below eye, fifth below eye and lower postocular; sixth and seventh supralabial below anterior temporal; sixth largest, irregular pentagonal; 1/1 anterior and 2/2 posterior temporals; anterior temporal narrow and long (right anterior temporal: height 1.4 mm, length 2.9 mm); upper and lower posterior temporals about same size (right lower posterior temporal: height 1.1 mm, length 2.0 mm; right upper posterior temporal: height 1.2 mm, length 1.7 mm); mental triangular (width 1.8 mm, length 1.4 mm); infralabials 9/9; first four infralabials in contact with anterior chin shields; fourth and fifth infralabials in contact with posterior chin shields; ninth infralabial smallest, fifth infralabial largest; anterior chin shields longer than posterior chin shields; anterior chin shields wider anteriorly than posteriorly; seven gular scales; one preventral; 178 ventrals; cloacal scute entire; 38 subcaudals; subcaudals/ventrals 0.21; dorsal scales smooth, in 19-19-17 rows, without apical pits; 12 dorsal scale rows at base of tail, eight at middle, and three before terminal scale.

Color in life: Dorsal and dorsolateral surfaces of head and body dark brown with an iridescent sheen, grading to yellowish orange laterally and onto venter, scales of pale lateral region with dark edges; throat and venter creamy white; supralabials creamy white to pale yellow, except upper tips of supralabials below eye and posterior to eye, which are the same color as dorsal portion of head.

Color in alcohol: Very similar as described for specimen in life, except that lateral brownish orange and orange-yellow portions have faded to creamy white.

Variation: The paratypes are very similar in scalation and pholidosis to the holotype (see Table 1 View TABLE 1 ). ZSM 5113/2005 (adult female; SVL 353mm; TL 58mm): 179 ventrals and 40 subcaudals; fourth to fifth supralabials contact eye; posterior upper edge of third supralabial elongated, reaching eye on both sides; only right parietal in contact with sixth supralabial, maxillary teeth aproximately 11. MNKR 4701 (adult female; SVL 312mm; TL 55mm): 171 ventrals and 40 subcaudals; 8 supralabials (3rd to 5th in contact with the eye); left and right parietals in contact with sixth supralabial.

length; TL: Tail length.

Coloration of paratypes in alcohol very similar to that of holotype: uniform dorsal and dorsolateral coloration on head and body (chocolate brown in ZSM 5113/2005, dark chocolate brown in MNKR 4701); in ZSM 5113/2005 dorsal coloration bordered by a longitudinal line of scattered, similarly dark dots, extending to level of cloaca ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 ).

Distribution and natural history: The new species is known only from the type locality and from close to San José, Department of Santa Cruz ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 ). Photographs and descriptions of specimens reported by Strüssman and Sazima (1993) and Marques et al. (2005) suggest this taxon might also be distributed in the Pantanal (see Strüssmann and Sazima 1993; Marques et al. 2005). Its occurrence in other neighboring open areas is possible, such as the savanna and Cerrado habitats of the Beni in Bolivia.

The holotype was active on the ground at 2300 hours in Cerrado savanna used for extensive cattle farming. The paratype MNKR 4701 was found at about 2100 hours at the edge of a wetland. Upon being captured, it was calm, exhibiting no aggressive behavior, but produced a strong-smelling secretion from the cloacal glands (A. Schulze, pers. comm.).

The x-ray image of the paratype ZSM 5113/2005 showed a frog in the stomach. The preference of anurans as prey for snakes of the genus Xenopholis was mentioned by Cunha and Nascimento (1978), Cunha et al. (1985), Duellman (1990), and França and Araújo (2007).

TABLE 1. Comparative morphometric and meristic data of Xenopholis species. See text for data sources. TTL: Total

Species Distribution Body size (mm) Ventrals Sub- caudals Dorsal scale rows Supralabials (eye contact) Infra- labials Temporals Pre- frontals
Xenopholis scalaris Ecuador, Columbia, Peru, Brasil, Bolivia TTL 250 390; TL 40 55 127 144 28 35 17-17-17 8 (4 5), rarely 7 (3 4) 9 1+2 1
X. undulatus Brazil, Paraguay TTL up to 465; TL up to 70 166 181 39 42 19-19-17 8 (4 5, rarely 3 5 or 3 4) 9 1+2 2
X. werdingorum Bolivia TTL 367– 411; TL 55– 58 171 179 38 40 19-19-17 8 (3 5), rarely (4 5) 9 1+2 2
MNKR

MNKR

ZSM

Germany, Muenchen [= Munich], Zoologische Staatssammlung

ZSM

Bavarian State Collection of Zoology

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Chordata

Class

Reptilia

Order

Squamata

Family

Colubridae

Genus

Xenopholis

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF