Opius latipes Fischer, 1958
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.37520/aemnp.2022.027 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:FA9F151F-C5FE-4048-9A82-8B21726D8D3E |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10560371 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/616187B8-6B14-FFC0-54BD-432CFA8073E5 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Opius latipes Fischer, 1958 |
status |
|
Opius latipes Fischer, 1958 View in CoL
Opius latipes Fischer, 1958a: 308 View in CoL , Figs 5–6 View Fig View Fig (original description).
The holotype and one paratype are deposited in NMPC (general collection):
HOLOTYPE (♂): ‘ Karlštejn / Boh . centr. 1954 / lgt. P. Starý [p] // Opius / latipes / n.sp. [hw, blue ink] / det. Fischer // HOLOTYPUS [p, red label] // Mus.Nat.Pragae / Inv. [p] 3226 [hw, orange label]’ ( Fig. 20 View Fig ).
PARATYPE (♂): ‘ Karlštejn / Boh. centr. 1954 / lgt. P. Starý [p] // Opius / latipes / n.sp. [hw] / det. Fischer [p] // PARATYPUS / O. latipes [hw, red label] // Mus. Nat. Pragae / Inv. [p] 26.072 [hw, orange label]’.
Current status. Junior synonym of Opius pendulus Haliday, 1837 (see BELOKOBYLsKIJ et al. 2003).
Distribution. Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Czech Republic, Croatia, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iran, Ireland, Italy, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Lithuania, Moldova, Poland, Russia, Serbia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, United Kingdom, USA ( YU et al. 2016, GADALLAH et al. 2022).
NMPC |
Czech Republic, Prague, National Museum (Natural History) |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Opius latipes Fischer, 1958
Hovorka, Tomáš & Macek, Jan 2022 |
Opius latipes
FISCHER M. 1958: 308 |