Stegana (Steganina) schildi Malloch, 1924

Bächli, Gerhard & Vilela, Carlos R., 2022, On the identities of Neotropical Stegana species (Diptera, Drosophilidae). III. Four Costa Rican species described by J. R. Malloch, Revista Brasileira de Entomologia (e 20210113) 66 (1), pp. 1-23 : 12-17

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.1590/1806-9665-RBENT-2021-0113

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10869423

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/5C7E1B53-DD17-D506-FFBE-8962FBCB5415

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Stegana (Steganina) schildi Malloch, 1924
status

 

Stegana (Steganina) schildi Malloch, 1924 View in CoL

( Figs. 17–25 View Figure 17 View Figure 18 View Figure 19 View Figure 20 View Figure 21 View Figure 22 View Figure 23 View Figure 24 View Figure 25 )

Stegana schildi Malloch, 1924a: 99 View in CoL (key, description); Malloch, 1924b: 5 (description); Heed, 1956: 3 (distribution); Heed, 1957: 76 (distribution); Wheeler, 1970: 79.7 (affiliation).

Stegana (Steganina) schildi Malloch View in CoL : Wheeler, 1960:110 (affiliation); Wheeler, 1981: 31 (affiliation); Brake and Bächli, 2008: 299 (affiliation).

Type locality: Costa Rica, Province of Alajuela, Canton of San Mateo, Higuito.

Diagnosis.Generally blackish flies.Front yellowish, with a conspicuous shining black, slightly prominent transverse stripe in the lower third. Pleura pale with an upper, distinct black band and a lower brownish band. Surstylus linked to the epandrium by membranous tissue,double-walled, outer wall not microtrichose, scarcely setose in the lower region, inner wall brush-like, with ca.40 strong, curved,sharp-tipped setae; prensisetae reduced to two, blunt and widely spaced apart pegs.Hypandrium strongly sclerotized,anterior margin deeply concave, laterally projected anterad by narrow sclerotized lamellae, posterior margin slightly concave;posterior hypandrial process absent; dorsal arch strongly sclerotized; gonopods fused to each other and posterior margin of hypandrium, devoid of seta. Aedeagus spatulate, 1/2 length of aedeagal apodeme with which it is fused. Aedeagal apodeme rod-shaped, laterally sinuate in the dorsal and ventral views.Ventral rod tongue-shaped,strongly sclerotized,linked to the posterior margin of the hypandrium and outer paraphysis by membranous tissue. Outer paraphysis reduced, bearing one large and two tiny setulae, linked to the supposedly fused gonopods (posterior hypandrial margin) and the apicolateral margin of the ventral rod.

Material examined (n = 9)

Holotype ♀ [#21, dissected] labeled ( Fig. 17 View Figure 17 ): “ Higuito / SanMateoCR [ Costa Rica] / PabloSchild / coll // Stegana / schildi / Type [handwritten] / Det./ J R Malloch [printed] // Type No./ 26674 [handwritten] / U.S.N.M. [red label] // USNMENT / [QR Code] / 01097758 [back side] // Stegana / schildi Malloch / Bächli & Vilela det. 2017 // HOLOTYPE [red label] // ♀” . Paratypes ♀♀ [#13–18; dissected: #13, #16, #17)]: same data as holotype, except Type and QR code labels. Non-type specimen ♂ [#20, dissected] labeled: “ Cano Saddle [apparently a dike] / Gatun L. [Lake (artificial, huge), part of Panama Canal Zone formed by the Gatun Dam in Chagres river], Pan [Panama] / RCShannon / V.13.1923 [handwritten] // Stegana / schildi Mall. [handwritten] / Det / J R Malloch // USNMENT [QR Code] / 01372797 [back side] // Stegana / schildi Malloch / Bächli & Vilela det. 2017 // ♂ ” ; ♀ [#19] labeled: “ COSTA RICA / La Suiza [de Turrialba] / April 1922 / Pab.[Pablo] Schild coll.// ALMelander / Collection / 1961 [green right half] // Stegana / schildi / Mall [handwritten] // USNMENT [QR code] 01372796 [back side] // ♀” .

Comments. Malloch (1924b) listed one male type [holotype], one allotype [female] and five paratypes. However, the type specimen series we have received contains seven female specimens (1 ♀ labeled type [holotype] plus 6 ♀♀ labeled paratype).

Redescription

♂. (n = 1). Head. Frons ( Fig. 22 View Figure 22 ) glossy, yellowish with a more or less darkened spot around the ocellar triangle, with a conspicuous shining black, slightly prominent transverse stripe in the lower third, the upper margin medially narrowed. Frontal length 0.61 mm; frontal index about 1.33, top to bottom width ratio about 1.22, frontal triangle hardly visible, about 40% of the frontal length; ocellar triangle black, prominent, about 25% of the frontal length. Orbital plates about 60–65% of the frontal length. Orbital setae almost arranged in a line, distance of or3 to or2 about 57% of or3 to or1, distance of or2 to or1 about 43% of or3 to or1, distance of or3 to or1 about 200% of or3 to vtm, vt index about 0.83, ocellar setae about 50% of frontal length; vibrissal index about 0.32. Face black in about upper half, white below. Carina narrow, prominent in the upper half of the face. Cheek white, broad, index about 6. Eye oblong, main axis distinctly oblique, index about 1.38. Occiput black in upper 5/6, white below. Pedicel yellowish. Flagellomere 1 slightly narrowed apically, black, with a narrow yellowish base and a length-to-width ratio of about 2.22. Arista with 10 dorsal, 7 ventral and about 7 rather long inner branches, plus a short terminal fork. Proboscis and palpus yellowish.

Thorax length about 2.28 mm. Scutum ( Fig. 21 View Figure 21 ) predominantly slightly microtrichose, brownish, paler on the frontal margin, with a paler median and a lateral stripe outside the dc lines, each preceded by a small somewhat circular pale spot; about 8 rows of acrostichal setae. One postpronotal seta: dc index about 0.39. Scutellum somewhat longish, apically slightly pointed, with a pale median stripe, scutellar setae nearly equidistant, lateral ones diverging, apical ones crossed, scut index about 1.85.Pleura ( Fig.21a, b View Figure 21 ) yellowish, with a broad, black stripe in upper third and a diffuse dark stripe or spot in the upper half of the katepisternum, sterno index about 0.86. Haltere with a yellow knob. Legs ( Fig. 21a,b,d View Figure 21 ) generally yellowish; fe1 with a dorso-apical dark spot, midleg brownish, with fe2 basally and apically yellowish and ti2 yellowish in the apical fourth, hindleg as midleg, but paler; preapical and ventral apical setae on ti2.

Wing ( Fig. 21c,d View Figure 21 ) apically pointed, generally dark brown, paler along the hind margin, costa apically with 9–11 warts below, r 2+3 apically bent towards the costa, both crossveins with a small shadow, m 3 somewhat sigmoid, length 3.29 mm, length to width ratio about 2.09. Indices: C = 1.93, hb = 0.85, 4C = 1.29, 4v = 1.81, 5x = 1.00, M = 0.48, prox. x = 1.05.

Abdomen ( Fig. 21d View Figure 21 ) glossy, dark brown, tergites with a diffuse blackish hind margin.

Terminalia ( Figs. 23-25 View Figure 23 View Figure 24 View Figure 25 ). Epandrium microtrichose and setose, except for the anterior region and ventral lobe, with ca. 20 upper and no lower setae; ventral lobe ( Fig. 23a View Figure 23 ) bare, projected inwards, mostly covering the surstylus.Cercus reduced to a narrow vertical stripe, setose, not microtrichose, without a ventral lobe and anteriorly linked to the epandrium by membranous tissue. Surstylus basally narrow, distally wide, curved inwards, ventromarginally bearing a row of small curved setae, double-walled, outer wall not microtrichose, scarcely setose in the lower region, inner wall like a brush, densely covered in the posteromedial area with ca. 40 strong, curved, sharply-tipped setae, probably supporting the function of prensisetae, which are scarce (just two, widely separated, upper one sharp, lower one blunt; Fig. 23c View Figure 23 ) on the inner margin of the surstylus, base of surstylus linked to the epandrium by membranous tissue. Decasternum medianly projected posterad, distolaterally bifid, distoventrally fused to the surstylus’ inner wall. Hypandrium strongly sclerotized, slightly wider than long and shorter than the epandrium, anterior margin deeply concave, laterally projected anterad like two somewhat squared table legs, lateral margin sinuate in the lateral view, bench-shaped in the anterior and posterior views, posterior margin slightly concave; posterior hypandrial process absent; dorsal arch strongly sclerotized, V-shaped and sinuate in the dorsal view, perpendicular and laterally fused to the hypandrium arms, dorsodistally slightly projected forwards and marginally serrate in the lateral view; gonopods fused to each other and to posterior margin of the hypandrium, devoid of seta. Aedeagus ( Figs. 24 View Figure 24 , 25 View Figure 25 ) dorsoventrally flattened, spatulate, bare, ca. 1/2 length of the aedeagal apodeme, and fused to each other. Aedeagal apodeme, curved, rod-shaped, anteriorly expanded dorsoventrally, twice as long as the aedeagus. Ventral rod strongly sclerotized, tongue-shaped, anteroposteriorly flattened, curved in the lateral view, linked to the posterior margin of the hypandrium and outer paraphysis by membranous tissue. Outer paraphysis reduced, bearing one large and two tiny setulae, linked to the supposedly fused gonopods (posterior hypandrial margin) and apicolateral margin of the ventral rod. Ejaculatory apodeme ( Fig. 24e,f View Figure 24 ) strongly sclerotized and somewhat similar to the aedeagus in the lateral view ( Fig.24e View Figure 24 ), plate ca. 43% of the handle length, and handle ca. 67% of the aedeagus+aedeagal apodeme length ( Fig. 24a View Figure 24 ), the inner angle between the handle and plate> 90°; plate trapezoid-shaped in the posterior view ( Fig. 24f View Figure 24 ).

♀. (n = 8). Differences compared to males: No obvious differences in external morphology (Figs, 18, 19). Measurements: Frontal length about 0.54 (0.47–0.65) mm. Frontal index about 1.27 (1.19–1.46), top to bottom width ratio about 1.20 (1.16–1.27), or1 / or3 ratio about 0.98 (0.85–1.14), or2 / or1 ratio about 0.71 (0.61–0.76), postocellar setae about 28 (21–34) % of the frontal length, ocellar setae about 44 (41–53) % of the frontal length, vt index about 0.92 (0.78–1.00), vibrissal index about 0.32 (0.28–0.35). Cheek index about 5 (4–7). Eye index about 1.32 (1.24–1.41). Flagellomere 1 ratio about 1.91 (1.60–2.14).

Thorax length about 1.86 (1.56–2.04) mm, dc index about 0.42 (0.39–0.46), scut index about 1.66 (1.08–2.06), sterno index about 0.86 (0.71–0.95).

Wing length 2.80 (2.38–3.22) mm, length to width ratio about 1.95 (1.79–2.09). Indices: C = 1.91 (1.78–2.04), hb = 0.81 (0.74–0.88), 4C = 1.23 (1.10–1.33), 4v = 1.74 (1.62–1.89), 5x = 0.94 (0.89–1.00), M = 0.46 (0.42–0.50), prox. X = 0.98 (0.88–1.17).

Terminalia (n = 1) ( Fig. 20 View Figure 20 ). One pair of finger-shaped cerci inserted beyond and between the epiproct and hypoproct. Oviscapt valves absent, sternite 8 (egg guide of Laštovka and Máca, 1982) horizontally positioned, somewhat trapezoid-shaped, with a straight posterior margin not protruding beyond the hypoproct. It does not bear peg-shaped ovisensilla, and its size and trichoid ovisensilla are similar to the setae of the preceding rectangle-shaped sternites. Inner spermathecal capsule bulbous, with a tailed appendage ( Laštovka and Máca, 1982) as long as sternite 8.

Distribution. Costa Rica (Provinces of Alajuela and Cartago), Panama (Canal Zone) [new record].

Biology. Unknown.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Diptera

Family

Drosophilidae

Genus

Stegana

SubGenus

Stegana

Loc

Stegana (Steganina) schildi Malloch, 1924

Bächli, Gerhard & Vilela, Carlos R. 2022
2022
Loc

Stegana (Steganina) schildi

Brake, I. & Bachli, G. 2008: 299
Wheeler, M. R. 1981: 31
Wheeler, M. R. 1960: 110
1960
Loc

Stegana schildi

Heed, W. B. 1957: 76
Heed, W. B. 1956: 3
Malloch, J. R. 1924: 99
Malloch, J. R. 1924: 5
1924
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF