Gonioctena (Asiphytodecta) subgeminata (Chen, 1934)
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1120.87526 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:711E0A82-82AB-43B5-9CC4-89BD87955061 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/5C1DEB19-7D45-5BAB-9CE8-CF89033551FC |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Gonioctena (Asiphytodecta) subgeminata (Chen, 1934) |
status |
|
Gonioctena (Asiphytodecta) subgeminata (Chen, 1934)
Figs 2A-C View Figure 2 , 3 View Figure 3 , 4 View Figure 4
Phytodecta subgeminatus Chen, 1934: 75 (China: Guandong, Guanzhou).
Phytodecta (Asiphytodecta) subgeminatus : Chen 1935: 131 (catalogue); Chen 1936: 88 (catalogue); Chûjô 1958: 67 (Taiwan).
Asiphytodecta subgeminatus : Chen and Young 1941: 208 (key).
Gonioctena (Asiphytodecta) subgeminata : Gressitt and Kimoto 1963: 365 (China: Guandong); Kippenberg 2010: 432 (catalogue); Yang et al. 2015: 54 (China: Hunan, Zhejiang); Cho 2021 (China: Anhui, Jiangxi, Sichuan).
Gonioctena (Asiphytodecta) subgeminatus : Kimoto and Chu 1996: 52 (catalogue); Kimoto and Takizawa 1997: 369 (catalogue).
Gonioctena subgeminata : Takizawa et al. 1995: 7 (additional records in Taiwan)
Types.
Two syntypes should be deposited at the MNHUB but appear to be lost ( Cho 2021).
Other material (n = 60).
China. Fujian: 1♂ (TARI), 建陽 ( Jianyang ), 黃坑 (Huangkeng), 場头 (Changtou), 700-950m, 23.VI.1960 , leg. 姜勝巧 (S.-Q. Jiang); 1♀ (TARI), 建陽 (Jianyang), 黃坑 ( Huangkeng ), 桂林 (Guiling), 290m, 21.VI.1960 , leg. 姜勝巧 (S.-Q. Jiang); Taiwan. Nantou: 1♀ (TARI), Baibara (= Meiyuan , 眉原), 24.III.1943, leg. A. Aoki ; 1♂ (TARI), Horisha (= Puli , 埔里), 10.V.1913, leg. M. Maki ; 1♂ (TARI), same locality, 10.IV.1919, leg. H. Kawamura (collector was not present on the card) ; 1♂ (TARI), Wanfengtsun (萬豐村), 2.IV.2008, leg. W.-T. Liu ; 1♂ (TARI), same but with “18.IV.2011”; Pingtung : 1♂ (TARI), Shinsuiyei (= Chinshuiying , 浸水營), 17.III.1926, leg. S. Issiki ; 1♀ (TARI), Tahanshan (大漢山), 5.IV.2009, leg. C.-F. Lee ; 2♂, 1♀ (TARI), same but with “26.III.2013”; 12♂, 2♀ (TARI), same but with “18.IV.2018”; 3♂, 1♀ (TARI), same locality, 3.IV.2012, leg. Y.-T. Chung ; 6♂, 2♀ (TARI), same but with “16.IV.2013”; 1♂, 1♀ (TARI), same but with “10.V.2013”; 2♂ (TARI), same but with “28.III.2016”; 2♂ (TARI), same but with “10.IV.2017”; 3♂ (TARI), same but with “17.IV.2017”; 1♂ (TARI), same but with “5.IV.2018”; 2♂ (TARI), same but with “9.IV.2018”; 1♂ (TARI), same but with “23.IV.2018”; 2♂ (TARI), same but with “27.IV.2020”; 1♂ (TARI), same but with “20.III.2021”; 1♂ (TARI), same but with “10.IV.2021”; 2♂ (TARI), same but with “15.IV.2021”; 2♂, 1♀ (TARI), same locality, 29.IV.2014, leg. J.-C. Chen.
Redescription.
Adult Length 5.2-6.3 mm, width 3.8-4.6 mm. Body color (Fig. 2A-C View Figure 2 ) yellowish brown, antennomeres VII-XI black, elytra with eleven black spots: three large spots along suture, anterior spot at basal 1/3, median at apical 1/3, the other at apices; one pair of large spots near base between suture and humeral calli; two pairs of spots at basal 1/3, large spot near lateral margin, small spot between large spot and one on suture; one pair of large spots at apical 1/3 near lateral margins. Antennae (Fig. 3A View Figure 3 ) with antennomere III-V slender, VI slightly swollen, VII-X strongly swollen, XI elongate oval, length ratios of antennomeres I-XI 1.0: 0.5: 0.5: 0.4: 0.3: 0.4: 0.5: 0.5: 0.5: 0.6: 0.9, length to width ratios of antennomeres I-XI 2.1: 1.3: 2.0: 1.7: 1.2: 1.0: 1.1: 1.1: 1.0: 1.0: 1.8. Pronotum 2.4 × wider than long; lateral margins widest at base, convergent and strongly narrowed anteriorly; anterior angles strongly produced; anterior and lateral margins bordered, lateral margins barely visible in dorsal view; trichobothria absent on both anterior and posterior angles; disc covered with sparse, tiny punctures, both sides covered with much larger, denser punctures. Scutellum distinctly wider than long, narrowed posteriorly. Elytra 1.1 × longer than wide; lateral margins slightly wider posteriorly, widest near middle; humeral calli well developed; disc covered with irregular punctures arranged in single rows; interspaces covered with fine, sparse punctures. Hind wing well developed. Aedeagus (Fig. 3B, C View Figure 3 ) with apical process widely rounded in dorsal view, lateral margins moderately narrowed in apical 1/4, with dense setae along lateral margins from near apex to apical 1/3; moderately curved in lateral view; endophallic sclerite extremely elongate, medially wider, basally membranous. Gonocoxae (Fig. 3D View Figure 3 ) slender, but apices wider and angular, disc with dense long setae. Ventrite VIII (Fig. 3E View Figure 3 ) transverse, with several short setae along outer margin. Receptacle of spermatheca (Fig. 3F View Figure 3 ) slightly swollen, not separated from pump; pump short and curved; sclerotized proximal spermathecal duct moderately long.
Diagnosis.
Adults of Gonioctena (Asiphytodecta) subgeminata are easily distinguished from those of other consubgeneric species, G. (A.) tredecimmaculata , by the following combination of the characters: lacking black spots on the pronotum (Fig. 2A View Figure 2 ) (with three black spots on the pronotum in G. (A.) tredecimmaculata (Fig. 2D View Figure 2 )), yellowish brown scutellum (Fig. 2A View Figure 2 ) (black scutellum in G. (A.) tredecimmaculata (Fig. 2D View Figure 2 )), three black spots on suture of elytra, at basal 1/3, median of apical 1/3, and at apices (Fig. 2A View Figure 2 ) (two black spots on suture of elytra, apical 1/3 and near apices in G. (A.) tredecimmaculata (Fig. 2D View Figure 2 )), punctures on elytra arranged into longitudinal striae (Fig. 2A View Figure 2 ) (punctures on elytra entirely confused in G. (A.) tredecimmaculata (Fig. 2D View Figure 2 )), apical process of aedeagus apically wider and apical margin widely rounded (Fig. 3B View Figure 3 ) (apically process of aedeagus apically narrow and apical margin narrowly rounded in G. (A.) tredecimmaculata (Figs 5B View Figure 5 , 6B View Figure 6 ), slender gonocoxae with angular apices (Fig. 3D View Figure 3 ) (wide gonocoxae with irregular apical margin in G. (A.) tredecimmaculata (Figs 5D View Figure 5 , 6D View Figure 6 )), sparse, short setae along outer margins of ventrites VIII (Fig. 3E View Figure 3 ) (dense, short setae along outer margins of ventrite VIII in G. (A.) tredecimmaculata (Figs 5E View Figure 5 , 6E View Figure 6 )), relatively wider spermatheca (Fig. 3F View Figure 3 ) (more slender spermatheca in G. (A.) tredecimmaculata (Figs 5F View Figure 5 , 6F View Figure 6 )).
Host plants.
Fabaceae : Pueraria sp. ( Yang et al. 2015) and Callerya reticulata (Benth.) Schot ( Lee et al. 2016; present study, see below).
Biology.
A large population of Gonioctena (Asiphytodecta) subgeminata was found in Tahanshan (大漢山), where Mr. Yi-Ting Chung (鍾奕霆) collected leaf beetles often. He collected early instar larvae feeding gregariously on young leaves (Fig. 4A-C View Figure 4 ) on 18 March 2022 from Callerya reticulata . In the lab, mature larvae (Fig. 4D View Figure 4 ) burrowed into the soil and built underground chambers for pupation on 22 March. Duration of the pupal stage (Fig. 4E View Figure 4 ) was seven days. Newly emerged adults (Fig. 4F View Figure 4 ) appeared in early April, but females failed to lay eggs. Thus, this species is likely univoltine since adults appear during spring (March to May).
Distribution.
China, Taiwan.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Chrysomelinae |
Genus |
Gonioctena (Asiphytodecta) subgeminata (Chen, 1934)
Lee, Chi-Feng & Hsieh, Chia-Hung 2022 |
Phytodecta subgeminatus
Chen 1934 |
Phytodecta (Asiphytodecta) subgeminatus
Chen 1934 |