Camptopterohelea, Borkent, 2024
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5438.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2CD64E2C-D575-463F-A8F4-390662DDC9E2 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/5875621C-FF49-29AA-FF3F-B740FD4373F3 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Camptopterohelea |
status |
|
Camptopterohelea View in CoL :
- Male antenna with 11 flagellomeres. This feature was discussed by Borkent & Picado (2008: character 9) as a synapomorphy of Camptopterohelea and * Eohelea . There are other reductions in numbers of flagellomeres, discussed under “Uncertain Character States”.
- Female labrum with a very small peg (in those species with biting mouthparts). The feature is nearly unique in the family (but see Stiloculicoides ).
- Female mandible either reduced (undescribed species) or with fine teeth but with the apex of the mandible rounded (pointed, with teeth to apex in all others).
- Female mandibular arm arising from a triangle of cuticle projecting ventrally from the margin of the eye). The feature is unique in the family.
- Female prementum medial suture separate medially into two halves (so the two halves of the prementum have a small gap between them. The feature is unique in the Culicomorpha, other than Simuliidae .
- Anterior anepisternum with dorsal point of medial suture terminating far posterior to anterior spiracle. This feature is unique in the Culicomorpha (see character 67 for further comparisons).
- Wing without r-m. This condition is nearly unique in Ceratopogonidae but r-m is also absent in Leptoconops , each clearly independent losses. Females are either missing M 1 and M 2 or possibly have these incorporated into a patch of strongly modified spicules.
- Male wing with apex of M 1 anterior of apex of wing. This feature is unique within Ceratopogonidae among extant taxa. However, all six species of * Gedanohelea , an Eocene fossil genus known only as females, have this feature except for * G. gerdesorum Stebner & Szadziewski , in which it is drawn with the apex of M 1 posterior to the apex of the wing. Further to this, the base of M 1 is illustrated as weak in extant C. distincta by Das Gupta & Sarkar (1982), also unique within the family but similar to the female of Leptohelea , its sister genus, perhaps indicating a level of homology.
- Female hind tibia without a tibial comb composed of strong spines; only the row of fine spicules is present. All other Ceratopogonidae , including fossil * Eohelea , have at least three ( Leptohelea ) strong spines in their combs. This feature is not described for the single male known for this genus and this autapomorphy may therefore apply to both sexes.
- For each leg, tarsomeres 2–4 nearly equal in size. In all other Ceratopogonidae , tarsomere 2 is longer than both tarsomere 3 and tarsomere 4 (the latter often of similar size).
- At least female with apical half of hind tarsomere 2 with a tight row 2–5 palisade setae. This feature is unique in the infraorder. Some other Ceratopogoninae also have these setae on hind tarsomere 2 but either sparsely spaced or, if more dense (e.g. Notiohelea ), distributed along its entire length (see “Hind tarsomere 2 and 3 with palisade setae” under “Uncertain Character States”).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.