Onitis castaneus Kollar, 1844
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2024.956.2657 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9DCDD521-909D-4436-8495-086A11C50DA0 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13742877 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/557187D2-FFF9-8916-9D68-F994FE37F82E |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Onitis castaneus Kollar, 1844 |
status |
|
Onitis castaneus Kollar, 1844 View in CoL
Figs 5C View Fig , 11A–D View Fig , 17 View Fig
Onitiscastaneus Kollar, 1844: 517 (original description).
Onitis castaneus View in CoL – Lansberge 1875: 144 (revision). — Arrow 1931: 398 (keys, description). — Balthasar 1935: 92 (monograph); 1963: 46 (monograph). — Janssens 1937: 74 (revision). — Chandra 2000: 360 (distribution). — Mittal 2005: 46 (list). — Bezděk & Krell 2006: 159 (describing author, year correction). — Chandra & Ahirwar 2007: 287 (distribution). — Sewak 2009b: 61 (distribution, diagnosis). — Singh et al. 2010: 1394 (distribution). — Gupta et al. 2015: 1037 (checklist). — Bezděk 2016: 179 (describing author, year correction, distribution). — Ghosh et al. 2020: 238 (distribution). — Schoolmeesters 2022 (online catalogue).
Differential diagnosis
Onitiscastaneus is similar to O. brahma and O. crassus in having a hairy pygidium and it differs from them in having tubercle on the clypeo-frontal carina while the tubercle is placed behind the clypeo-frontal carina in both the latter species. It differs from O. brahma in the frontal carina being entire; the clypeal margin being straight while the carina is interrupted and the clypeal margin is slightly excised in O. brahma . Onitiscastaneus differs from O. crassus in having longer hairs on the pygidium while the latter has short setae.
Material examined
Syntype (3 specimens)
INDIA • ♂, 2 ♀♀; “Kaschmir, Hügel”; NHMW.
Additional material (17 specimens)
INDIA • ♂; “ Kheri Forest , U.P. India ., Jan’ 16 HGC; H.G. Champion Coll., B.M. 1953-156.; Onitis castaneus, Redt. G. J. Arrow det.”; BMNH (E) 1237151 • ♀; “ Gazighat, Multan Div. Punjab , 15. 2. 28., C.F.C. Beeson; ex coll. Dehradun, B.M. 1928-472., ex Cattle dung;” BMNH (E) 1237152 • ♀; “ Pilani , Rajasthan; 1957; Coll: H.L. Khandu, Det: T. G. Vazirani ”; ZSIM • 10 ♂♂, 4 ♀♀; Assam, Tezpur, under Kolia bhomora bridge; hand-picked, cattle dung; 19 Dec. 2018; Rajkamal Goswami leg.; AIMB / Co/ Sc1000023 to 1000036 .
Description
MEASUREMENTS (in mm). TL=16–19; BW=9.5–12; PL=6.5–7.5; PW=9–11; EL= 8.5–10; HL=4. 5–5.5; HW =5–6.
Male
Dark chestnut brown; head with strongly elevated frontal carina acuminate in the middle; clypeal margin strongly reflexed, straight in the middle, with long transverse arcuate carina, frontal carina straight, rugulose in front, with tubercle behind; vertex strongly excavated; pronotum unevenly punctured, strongly rugulose anteriorly, tuberculate between the basal foveae; front angles rather blunt, deep basal foveae closely placed; elytra opaque, finely striate, intervals flat, feebly punctured; pygidium sparsely hairy; metasternum closely tuberculate, hairy with a longitudinal median groove; front legs long, slender, strongly curved, armed with four short teeth externally, profemur with a strong oblique spine near the middle of anterior edge, middle tibia with two strong processes at its outer edge.
AEDEAGUS (in mm) ( Fig. 11A–D View Fig ). LP=3.03, Lp =2.78; BP=1.32, BpB=1.07, BpT=0.43. Parameres shorter than phallobase, dorsal side of parameres straight at the base, tip broader and curved and tip blunt.
Female
Protibia short, broad bearing four strong external teeth; clypeus more rounded in the middle than male; frontal tubercle more prominent.
Distribution
India: Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Bihar, Gujarat, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu and Kashmir, Madhya Pradesh, Meghalaya, Punjab, Rajasthan, Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal. Other countries: Nepal; Pakistan ( Chandra 2000; Mittal 2005; Bezděk & Krell 2006; Chandra & Ahirwar 2007; Sewak 2009b; Singh et al. 2010; Gupta et al. 2015; Bezděk 2016; Ghosh et al. 2020; Schoolmeesters 2022).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Onitis castaneus Kollar, 1844
Karimbumkara, Seena Narayanan & Priyadarsanan, Dharma Rajan 2024 |
Onitis castaneus
Ghosh J. & Das, P. & Ghosh S. K. & Bhunia D. & Kushwaha R. K. & Gupta D. & Chandra K. 2020: 238 |
Bezdek A. 2016: 179 |
Gupta D. & Chandra K. & Khan S. 2015: 1037 |
Sewak R. 2009: 61 |
Chandra K. & Ahirwar S. C. 2007: 287 |
Bezdek A. & Krell F. - T. 2006: 159 |
Mittal I. C. 2005: 46 |
Chandra K. 2000: 360 |
Janssens A. 1937: 74 |
Balthasar V. 1935: 92 |
Arrow G. J. 1931: 398 |
Lansberge G. 1875: 144 |