Cyphomyrmex rimosus (Spinola)
publication ID |
13137 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6281645 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/54F04EA5-2233-0C51-626F-FEB5778B1679 |
treatment provided by |
Christiana |
scientific name |
Cyphomyrmex rimosus (Spinola) |
status |
|
Cyphomyrmex rimosus (Spinola) View in CoL HNS (Figs 30.9, 30.17, 30.21, 30.2 5)
Cryptocerus? rimosus Spinola HNS , 1 8 5 3:65;
Meranoplus difformis F. Smith HNS , 1858:195;
Cataulacus deformis HNS (sic') Roger, 186 3:2 10. new synonymy.
Cyphomyrmex rimosus HNS : Emery, 189 3: 2. Emery, 1894:224, 225.
Cyphomyrmex rimosus var. fuscus Emery HNS , 1894:225;. new synonymy.
Cyphomyrmex rimosus var. fusculus Emery HNS , 1922:342.
Cyphomyrmex rimosus subsp. curiapensis Weber HNS , 1938:190;;.
Cyphomyrmex rimosus subsp. cochunae Kuszenov HNS , 1949:4 39- 41.. new synonymy.
We have examined the syntypes of C. rimosus HNS , a worker and three males, in the MIZS. Morphologically they are identical to the form described by Emery (1894) as var. fuscus HNS . The worker syntype of C. rimosus HNS , here designated the lectotype, is callow and it is probably for that reason that Emery described normally-coloured workers as var. fuscus HNS . Emery had earlier (1893) examined the syntypes of C. rimosus HNS and so had a clear idea of the appearance of the worker; the var. fuscus HNS was distinguished only by its darker colour.
Cataulacus deformis HNS is usually listed as a synonym of C. minutus HNS . The name is a misspelling of F. Smith's Meranoplus difformis HNS . Roger introduced this variant spelling when he declared that Mayr's minutus HNS was the same as 'deformis'. It is an arguable point, and a trivial one, but we believe that it is most appropriate to maintain the difformis HNS - deformis HNS link.
Weber (1958) established the synonymy of C.r. curiapensis HNS with C. fuscus HNS . Kusnezov's subspecies was described as a simple colour variant. Although we have seen no type material of this form, we find nothing in the original description to suggest that it is anything other than what it appears to be: an insignificant colour form not worthy of formal recognition. Previous records for C. rimosus HNS are from Argentina, Brazil, the Guianas, and Venezuela.
This species has been introduced and is established in the south-eastern United States. We have seen the following specimens: Alabama: Baldwin Co, Gulf State Park, 16 Apr. 1950 (E.O. Wilson; USNM). Mobile Co, Mobile, 6 May 1950 (E.O. Wilson; LACM); Mobile, 26 Jan. 1950 (A. J. Graham; USNM), in abandoned fire ant mound. County unknown, Cottage Hill, 2 Dec. 1949 (J. M. Coarsell; USNM). florida: Alachua Co, near Gainesville airport, 11 Nov. 1981 (J.C. Trager; JCT, LACM), in disturbed flatwood; La Crosse, 1 July 1981 Q.C. Trager; JCT, LACM), in pasture; Archer Road Lab., Gainesville, 16 June 1984 QC. Trager; JCT, LACM), under boards 2 colonies). Highlands Co, Archbold Biological Station. Price Tract, 10 Oct. 1981 (J.C. Trager; JCT, LACM), in rotting branch on ground; Highlands Hammock State Park, 7 Sept. 1981 R.K. Snelling; LACM), in mowed grass area adjacent to forest. Leon Co, Tallahassee, 10 Jan. 1 98 3 G.B. Marshall; LACM), hardwood litter berlesate. Mississippi: Harrison Co, IO miles N. Gulfport, Nov. 1957 H.T. Yanderford; USNM; Lyman, 24 Mar. 1 9 70 (C. H. Craig; USNM), ex fire ant mound..Mates have been taken within nests between 6 May and 1 July.
In addition to the differences cited in the above key, workers of C. rimosus HNS may be further differentiated from those of C. minutus HNS by the more prominent dorsal mesosomal tubercles; in particular, the anterior mesonotai tubercle is bluntly triangular in C. rimosus HNS , rather than very low and obtuse as in C. minutus HNS . In C. rimosus HNS the metafemur is sometimes angulate at the basal one-third of the ventral surface, but often it is broadly rounded, and there is, at most, a very weak ridge extended distally from the angulation. The metafemur is distinctly angulate in C. minutus HNS and an often lamella-like carina extends distally from the angulation.
Females of the two species differ in many of the same features as do their workers, except, of course, those of mesosomal contour. The head width of C. rimosus HNS females is 0.75 mm or more; that of C. minutus HNS is less than 0.70 mm, usually about 0.67mm. Males of C. rimosus HNS are a little larger than those of C. minutus HNS (head width, across eyes, 0.73 vs. 0.68 mm), the lateral ocelli are elevated, the occipital tubercle is bluntly spinelike, and the propodeal teeth, although short, are definitely spine-like.
The following biological information has been provided by J.C. Trager for two samples collected 16 June, 1984 in Gainesville:
These ... were under boards in a weedy lot next to my lab. The brood and fungus gardens of the colonies were kept apart but adjacent on grass stolons or compacted grass blades near the center of single nearly round 5-8 cm-diam. chambers, 1-2 cm deep. Males were clustered on the underside of the board (the warmest, driest part of the nest). The insect fragments, grasshopper feces, etc. collected with one series were heaped separately at opposite sides of the periphery of the nest chamber. This rigid compartmentalization of castes and materials is typical of... this ant. [Queens are usually] associated with the brood [and] most often there are 1 or 2 queens per nest, but I've seen 3 or 4 on occasion. Mating flights take place at the first faint light of dawn, following heavy rains alter a dry spell during the summer months.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |