Ischnothyreus kentingensis, Tong, Yanfeng & Li, Shuqiang, 2014
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.396.7033 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D2E8CA47-C4D1-4D44-991B-D6FBAA316610 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/4E4779BF-82D5-470A-AE0C-4D5383D5CB1B |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:4E4779BF-82D5-470A-AE0C-4D5383D5CB1B |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Ischnothyreus kentingensis |
status |
sp. n. |
Ischnothyreus kentingensis View in CoL sp. n. Figs 1-3
Material examined.
Holotype ♂ (IZCAS AR 27808): CHINA: Taiwan: Pingtung County, Kenting, hills near the Howard Beach Resort, 21°56'27.00"N, 120°48'26.68"E, elevation ca. 34 m, 27 June 2013, S. Li & Y. Tong leg. Paratypes: same data as holotype, 1 ♂, 2 ♀ (SYNU-20); same data as holotype, 1 ♂, 5 ♀ (SYNU-58); same data as holotype, 1 ♂, 1 ♀ (SYNU-21).
Etymology.
The specific name is taken from the type locality; adjective.
Diagnosis.
The new species is similar to Ischnothyreus spineus Tong & Li, 2012, but can be distinguished by the male chelicerae which each bear two strong, short thorn-like processes (tlp in Figs 1H, 3C) and the female genital area possessing a large goblet-like atrium (Fig. 2 G–K). The males of Ischnothyreus spineus bear only one long, curved thorn-like process on each of the chelicerae (see Tong and Li 2012: Figs 3H, 5C) and no visible atrium, with only a simple winding tube in female genital area (see Tong and Li 2012: Figs 4G, H, 5D, E).
Description.
Male (holotype). Total length 1.26; carapace 0.69 length, 0.54 width; abdomen 0.61 length, 0.33 width. Habitus as in Fig. 1A, C, E. Carapace: orange-brown, with brown egg-shaped patches behind eyes, oval in dorsal view, pars cephalica strongly elevated in lateral view, surface and sides strongly reticulate (Fig. 1B, D). Eyes: six, in one group, well developed, ALE largest, PME and PLE nearly equal sized; posterior eye row straight from above, procurved from front (Fig. 1G). Mouthparts: chelicerae slightly divergent, with a slightly sclerotized process at base of fangs (ssp) and two strong, thorn-like processes (tlp) in the middle of the retrolateral margin; fang groove with a few small denticles (Figs 1H, 3C). Anterior margin of labium not indented at middle. Anteromedian tip of endites with one strong, tooth-like projection (Fig. 1F). Abdomen: posterior spiracles not connected by groove. Pedicel tube short, unmodified, scutum extending far dorsal of pedicel. Dorsal scutum covering about 4/5 of abdomen, about equal to the abdomen width, not fused to epigastric scutum. Epigastric and postepigastric scutum well sclerotized, pale orange, fused. Leg spine formula: femur I with 2 prolateral and 1 small retrolateral spine, tibia I with 4 pairs, metatarsus I with 2 pairs of long ventral spines. Spination of leg II similar to leg I except femur with only one prolateral spine. Legs III and IV spineless. Genitalia: sperm pore situated at level of anterior spiracles. Palp strongly sclerotized, trochanter with ventral projection (vp); patella about as long as femur, not enlarged; cymbium brown, not fused with bulb, bulb brown, more than twice as long as cymbium, stout, tapering apically, with two small ventral protuberances (vpr), at the bending site with a membranous lobe (ml), distal part of bulb with membranous outgrowth (meo) (Figs 1 I–K, 3A, B, D).
Female (paratype). Total length 1.51; carapace 0.64 length, 0.52 width; abdomen 0.87 length, 0.56 width. Habitus as in Fig. 2A, C, E. As in male except as noted. Carapace: without any pattern, pars cephalica slightly elevated in lateral view (Fig. 2B, D). Mouthparts: chelicerae and endites unmodified (Fig. 2F). Abdomen: dorsal scutum covering about 2/3 of abdomen, about 1/2 of abdomen width. Postepigastric scutum elongated hexagonal, not fused to epigastric scutum, with short posteriorly directed lateral apodemes (a) (Fig. 2G, H, J). Genitalia: at the middle of the anterior edge of the postepigastric scutum runs a dark, strongly winding tube posteriorly (wt), ending in a large goblet-like atrium (gla) close to posterior edge of scutum (Fig. 2I, K).
Distribution.
Known only from the type locality.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |