Ulnaria tooelensis Graeff, Kociolek & S.R. Rushforth, 2013
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.153.1.1 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/546B8784-F966-3964-FF3D-7C48FEF4652A |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Ulnaria tooelensis Graeff, Kociolek & S.R. Rushforth |
status |
sp. nov. |
Ulnaria tooelensis Graeff, Kociolek & S.R. Rushforth , sp. nov. ( Figs 38–55 View FIGURES 38–48 View FIGURES 49–55 ; figure 40 = holotype)
Valves linear to linear-elliptical in smaller specimens, tumid on one side of the central area, with apices subcapitate in larger specimens and protracted in smaller specimens ( Figs 38–46 View FIGURES 38–48 ). Length 14.0– 97.5 µm, breadth 3.5–5.5 µm. Central sternum very narrow, straight, widening unilaterally at the center to form a rectangular central area on one side ( Figs 40, 43 View FIGURES 38–48 ). Striae punctate, more or less opposite and parallel, infrequently with a stray stria without a corresponding stria on the opposite side of the central sternum ( Figs 41, 44 View FIGURES 38–48 ). Striae number 11–15/ 10 µm in the center of the valve, 13–16/ 10 µm at the ends. A labiate process (rimoportula) is positioned at each end of the valve ( Figs 40–41 View FIGURES 38–48 ). A pore field is present at the very terminus of the valve on each end ( Figs 39–41, 45–46 View FIGURES 38–48 ). The cingulum is comprised of at least two closed girdle bands each with a single row of poroids ( Figs 47–48 View FIGURES 38–48 ).
In the SEM, the valve has small, rounded, unoccluded areolae comprising the striae ( Figs 51–52, 54–55 View FIGURES 49–55 ). The striae are more or less aligned, though that arrangement breaks down in places along the valve ( Figs 49–50 View FIGURES 49–55 ). The rimoportula opening is round, similar in size to the areolae, but located within a small depression ( Fig. 51 View FIGURES 49–55 ). The unilateral central area has some thickened interstriae present ( Fig. 52 View FIGURES 49–55 ). Ocellimbi are evident on the margin at the poles ( Figs 49–51 View FIGURES 49–55 ). Internally, the unornamented central area is evident, and the central sternum is narrow ( Figs 53, 55 View FIGURES 49–55 ). The rimoportula is small, elliptical and bordered by narrow “lips” ( Fig. 54 View FIGURES 49–55 ). Internally, the ocellimbi are distinct with a fine grid pattern positioned at the valve terminus on the mantle ( Fig. 54 View FIGURES 49–55 ).
Type:— USA. Blue Lake , Tooele Co., Utah. ( COLO 439033 About COLO , holotype! (= Fig. 40 View FIGURES 38–48 ), designated here; COLO 8505 About COLO , BM 101677, isotypes)
Etymology:—Named for the county in which it is found.
Distribution:— Ulnaria tooelensis is common in the main basin of Blue Lake and the surrounding marsh.
Observations:—This diatom was identified by Kaczmarska and Rushforth (1983) as Fragilaria vaucheriae (Kützing) Petersen (1938: 167) . These two diatoms are morphologically distinct, as illustrated by Krammer & Lange-Bertalot (1991: pl. 108, figs 10–15). They examined the type material of Exilaria vaucheriae Kützing (1833: 32) , the basionym of F. vaucheriae . The valve margins of Ulnaria tooelensis taper gradually toward the apices while they are relatively parallel in F. vaucheriae . The apices of U. tooelensis are broader than those in in F. vaucheriae . However, the valve breadths and stria densities of the two taxa are congruent (Krammer & Lange–Bertalot 1991: 124).
Other species that appear similar to U. tooelensis include Synedra capitellata Grunow in Van Heurck (1881: plate 40, fig. 26), S. familiaris f. major Grunow in Van Heurck (1881: plate 40, fig. 16), S. rumpens var. scotica Grunow in Van Heurck (1881: plate 40, fig. 11) and S. rumpens var. meneghiniana Grunow in Van Heurck (1881: plate 40, fig. 13). All of these taxa are linear, with barely to distinctly capitate headpoles and coarse striae. They are all much smaller (Grunow in Van Heurck 1881, Patrick & Reimer 1966, also see Krammer & Lange-Bertalot 1991 under names within the genus Fragilaria ) than what we have observed for U. tooelensis , and the valves of our new taxon that are in the same size range as these are shaped differently and have striae that are much more disorganized. A review of the nomenclature, types and ultrastructure of these species is presented in Tuji & Williams (2006, 2013). Further work on the ultrastructure and systematics of this complex of species, including the S. delicatissima W. Smith (1853: 72) group ( Tuji & Williams 2007) and F. gracilis Østrup (1910: 190) (Tuji 2007) , will go far to help elucidate circumscription of these two genera and the placement of these species within them.
Smaller specimens of this species also bear a superficial resemblance to Staurosirella micra Levkov & Williams (2011: 8) , described recently from Lake Ohrid ( Levkov & Williams 2011). This Ohrid species has a tumid central area that is has one side without ornamentation. Like U. tooelensis , Staurosirella mica also has pore fields at both apices and striae composed of uniseriate rows of round to elliptical areolae ( Levkov & Williams 2011: figs 39–56). The two species differ in the structure of the pore fields (an ocellimbus in U. tooelensis ) and areolae (simple rounded pores both internally and externally in U. tooelensis ), and the presence of two rimoportulae, one at each end, in U. tooelensis .
Because U. tooelensis has a rimoportula and ocellulimbus at each apex ( Round et al. 1990) and closed girdle bands with a row of poroids, the taxon is excluded from the genus Fragilaria (Williams 1986; Williams & Round 1986). Our species lacks the external areolar occlusions of Catacombas Williams & Round (1986: 314) , leaving us with placement of this species in Ulnaria (Kützing) Compére (2001: 100) . This taxon and its interesting suite of character states provides additional information for a future review of the phylogenetic relationships of this interesting group of diatoms, and the taxonomic implications such a review and analysis would yield.
BM |
Bristol Museum |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.