Philothalpus juanecoi Asenjo & Ribeiro-Costa
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.191261 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6220445 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/535A87F3-FFC2-FFE2-E8D6-FB7A0182F831 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Philothalpus juanecoi Asenjo & Ribeiro-Costa |
status |
sp. nov. |
Philothalpus juanecoi Asenjo & Ribeiro-Costa View in CoL , new species
( Figs. 1–11 View FIGURES 1 – 6 View FIGURES 7 – 11 )
Type material. Holotype: PERU: 3, with labels: “ PERU: CU [Cusco], Campamento / Paratori, 27.x.2002 / 12º3’S 72º58’W, 690 m, / Pitfall trap, J. Grados”, “ HOLOTYPUS / Philothalpus / juanecoi Asenjo & Ribeiro-Costa / Desig. Asenjo & Ribeiro-Costa, 2009” ( MUSM). Paratypes (2): PERU: 3, with labels: “ PERU: CU [Cusco], Campamento / Paratori, 24.x.2002, / 12º3’S 72º58’W, 690 m, / Pitfall trap, J. Grados”, “ PARATYPUS / Philothalpus / juanecoi Asenjo & Ribeiro-Costa / Desig. Asenjo & Ribeiro-Costa, 2009" ( DZUP); Ƥ, “ PERU: CU [Cusco], Campamento / Comerciato, 23.xi.2002 / 14º47’S 73º22’W, 1350 m, / Pitfall trap, J. Grados”, “ PARATYPUS / Philothalpus / juanecoi Asenjo & Ribeiro-Costa / Desig. Asenjo & Ribeiro- Costa, 2009” ( MUSM).
Diagnosis. Among Philothalpus species, P. juanecoi sp. n. is similar to P. falini Chatzimanolis & Ashe, 2005 in having the head and pronotum dark reddish brown, but in P. juanecoi sp. n. the elytra are metallic, dark reddish brown, almost black, while in P. falini they are dark and metallic green. Philothalpus juanecoi sp. n. can be distinguished from the other species of Philothalpus by the paramere strongly expanded apically and having apical emargination ( Figs. 9, 11 View FIGURES 7 – 11 ).
Description. Holotype male, BL: 12.41.
Body dark brown ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 6 ). Head ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1 – 6 ) and pronotum ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 6 ) dark reddish brown; antennal segments 1– 3 lighter; legs ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 6 ) light reddish brown; elytra metallic; scutellum and elytra ( Figs 1, 4 View FIGURES 1 – 6 ) dark reddish brown, almost black. Abdominal terga III–V ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 6 ) each with triangular dark reddish brown spot medially, apical margin light reddish brown; tergum VI black ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 6 ) with apical margin reddish brown; tergum VII ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 6 ) with basal half dark reddish brown, almost black, and apical margin light reddish brown. Prosternum, meso- and metaventrite dark reddish brown; abdominal sterna III–V ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 1 – 6 ) dark reddish brown with lighter apical margin, sternum VI black with apical margin reddish brown; sternum VII ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 6 ) with basal half dark reddish brown, almost black, and apical margin light reddish brown.
Head ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1 – 6 ) wider (HW: 1.94) than long (HL: 1.45), with rounded hind angles, head disk with umbilicate punctures each carrying a brown microseta. Epicranium with micropunctures between umbilicate punctures, slightly convex and smooth medially; umbilicate punctures absent medially, denser posteriorly (about 4.59 punctures / 0.3 mm) than anteriorly (about 3.06 punctures / 0.3 mm), lateral density about 3.38 punctures / 0.3 mm. Eyes prominent ( Figs. 1–2 View FIGURES 1 – 6 ), length (OL: 1.00) about 7/10 the length of head, distance between eyes (IO: 1.74) about 4.2 times the width of eyes (OW: 0.41). Gula very narrow posteriorly (GL: 1.37, GW: 0.04), gular sulci widely separated anteriorly and medially and contiguous posteriorly. Neck with 4–5 transverse irregular rows of umbilicate punctures; without micropunctures. Antennae with scape gradually thickened, pedicel (0.33) shorter than 2.0 times the length of scape (0.61), pedicel and segment 3 similar in width (0.33), segment 3 longer (0.41) than pedicel (0.33), segment 4 (length 0.2: width 0.18) longer than wide, segment 5 quadrate (0.20:0.20), segment 6 wider than long (0.18:0.22), segment 7 wider than long (0.18: 0.22), segment 8 wider than long (0.18:0.24), segment 9 wider than long (0.18:0.24), segment 10 wider than long (0.18:0.27); segments 4–11 densely covered by microsetae; scape and pedicel with black macrosetae lacking a defined pattern, on segment 3 arranged in four rings, on segments 4–7 arranged in 3 rings, on segments 8–10 forming 2 rings in the apical region and disorderly arranged on segment 11.
Pronotum ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 6 ) longer than wide (PL: 2.18; PW: 1.90), wider anteriorly, lateral margins gently concave in posterior 2/3; with glossy golden microsetae and few black macrosetae along borders. Superior line of hypomeron completely visible in dorsal view. Disk with longitudinally elongate umbilicate punctures (about 3.7 punctures / 0.3 mm), except on smooth medial line that is abbreviated anteriorly; rare micropunctures only on median line. Scutellum ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1 – 6 ) with glossy microsetae and micropunctures. Elytra ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1 – 6 ) wider than pronotum (EL: 2.38; EW: 2.48); punctation course and denser than on pronotum (about 4 punctures / 0.3 mm); with glossy yellowish microsetae, a few black macrosetae arranged along lateral and posterior borders.
Legs ( Fig. 1 View FIGURES 1 – 6 ) uniformly covered with glossy yellowish microsetae, tibiae with dark brownish macrosetae; segments of protarsus 1–4 strongly bilobate and ventrally with yellowish setae.
Terga and sterna III–VII with golden and black setae, golden microsetae predominate on terga and sterna III–V and black macrosetae on terga and sterna VI–VII, black macrosetae arranged in row at the apical borders of all terga and sterna except tergum VII, posterior angles of terga and sterna III–VI with one longer black macroseta. Terga III–V with subbasal carina curved and transverse basal carina; subbasal carina fused to transverse basal carina in middle region. Basal carina on middle of sterna III–V ( Fig. 5 View FIGURES 1 – 6 ) projected posteriorly, straight on sternum VI, projected anteriorly on sternum VII and emarginate anteriorly on lateral third of sterna III–VII.
Male with median subbasal depression on sternum VII ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 1 – 6 ) completely covered with tuft of long setae. Sternum VIII and tergum X slightly emarginate, sternum IX emarginate. Tergum IX ( Fig. 8 View FIGURES 7 – 11 ) long, straight, covered with prominent macrosetae. Aedeagus as in Figs. 9–11 View FIGURES 7 – 11 ; paramere expanded apically, symmetric, with median apical emargination, slightly shorter than median lobe. Sensory spinules as in Fig. 11 View FIGURES 7 – 11 ; arranged in a single marginal row. Median lobe symmetrical, apex acute; in lateral view apex bent dorsally, with oblique incision toward apex.
Female similar to male, except first four protarsomeres less expanded.
Distribution. Known from Paratori and Comerciato camps, Cusco, south region of Peru, from the altitude of 690 m and 1350 m, respectively.
Habitat. From pitfall traps in rainforest.
Etymology. The species name is in honour of Juan Grados, the collector of the specimens and a colleague of the first author, curator of Arctiidae (Lepidoptera) at MUSM. The name “Juaneco” is the diminutive form of “Juan” in the regional language of the Loreto department ( Peru).
DZUP |
Universidade Federal do Parana, Colecao de Entomologia Pe. Jesus Santiago Moure |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |