Echiniscus quitensis, Pilato, Giovanni, 2007
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.273676 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5670894 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/517A6F2E-FFE3-FFB6-FF37-FF7FFF6AF9BD |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Echiniscus quitensis |
status |
sp. nov. |
Echiniscus quitensis sp. n.
Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 , Fig. 3 A View FIGURE 3. A , C
Type locality. Ecuador, Quito.
Material examined. Type specimen (slide N. 3577) and two paratypes.
Species diagnosis. Third median plate absent; terminal plate unfaceted; cirrus A short; other lateral and dorsal trunk appendages absent; cuticular plates with small dots, joined to one another by very thin stripes difficult to see, and light points; anterior portion of the paired plates II and III, anterior portion of the median plate 2 and the area corresponding to the median plate 3 with large polygonal points without joining stripes and without light points. Internal claws with a spur.
Description of the holotype. Body length 257 μm ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 A); the true body colour is not discernible since the specimen has decolorized, but, due to the fact that Maucci wrote Echiniscus rufoviridis on the label, it is probably similar to that of this species. Third median plate absent but the corresponding area is sculptured ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 C); terminal plate unfaceted and with two incisions. The cuticular sculpture is characteristic; cephalic plate, scapular plate, median plate 1 ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 B), posterior portion of paired plates II and III, posterior portion of median plate 2 and terminal plate ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 C, D) with a double ornamentation with many small, dark, almost starshaped points joined to one another by very thin stripes very difficult to see, and less numerous, larger light points. Dots of the terminal plate slightly smaller than those of the other plates. Neck plate with only small points not joined to one another by stripes. Anterior portion of the paired plates II and III ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 C), anterior portion of the median plate 2 and area corresponding to the median plate 3 with a very different ornamentation with large (diameter up to 1.6 μm) polygonal points, without joining stripes and without light points. Cuticle between the scapular plate and the paired plates II, and between the paired plates II and III with only small dots. Ventral surface with many very small dots.
External and internal cephalic cirri ( Fig. 3 A View FIGURE 3. A ) 23.5 μm and 15.1 μm long respectively; cephalic papilla 8.4 μm long; clava 6.9 μm long; cirrus A 36.3 μm long. No other lateral or dorsal appendage present. First pair of legs with a spine 4.2 μm long ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 B); fourth pair of legs with a papilla 5.5 μm long and a dentate fringe with 8 unequal teeth ( Figs 1 View FIGURE 1 C, 3 C).
Claws well developed; external and internal claws of the second pair of legs 15.3 μm and 16.3 μm long respectively; external and internal claws of the fourth pair of legs 18.2 μm and 19.1 μm long respectively. Internal claws with a straight spur turned downwards ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3. A C).
Etymology. The specific name refers to the type locality (Quito).
Remarks. Echiniscus quitensis sp. n. differs from E. rufoviridis in lacking the third median plate, in having the terminal plate unfaceted, shorter claws, a spur on the internal claws and in the characteristics of the plate ornamentation. As this characteristic is concerned, du BoisReymond Marcus in the description of E. rufoviridis (1944, pag. 3) wrote: “Escultura dupla: puntos finos uniformes, cerrados e sitos na profundidade da cuticula; covinhas maiores, irregulares e mais escassas, que parteneem à superficie da cuticula. Faltan covinhas nas metades anteriores das placas pares, na mesma da 2a placas intercalar, e na 2a intercalar inteira.” In E. quitensis sp. n. the anterior portion of the paired plates, the anterior portion of the median plates 2 and the area corresponding to the median plate 3 have large polygonal points ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 C) instead of small dots.
E. quitensis sp. n. is very similar to E. charrua Claps & Rossi, 1997 View in CoL of which I examined 5 paratypes ( Figs 2 View FIGURE 2 and 3 View FIGURE 3. A B, D). The cuticular sculpture of the new species is of the same type but some differences are evident: scapular plate with smaller and more numerous light points ( Figs 1 View FIGURE 1 B and 2 A); dark dots more distant from each other and joining stripes more evident; anterior portion of the median plate 2, anterior portion of the paired plates II and III and the area corresponding to the median plate 3 ( Figs 1 View FIGURE 1 C and 2 C) with larger and less numerous polygons (diameter up to 1.6 μm in the holotype of E. quitensis 257 μm long, up 1.1 μm in a paratype of E. charrua View in CoL 270 μm long); light points on median plate 1 and posterior portion of the paired plates II and III ( Figs 1 View FIGURE 1 C and 2 C) smaller and less numerous than in E. charrua View in CoL . Cephalic papilla shorter ( Figs 3 A and 3 View FIGURE 3. A B); internal claws with a straight spur turned downwards absent in E. charrua View in CoL ( Figs 3 View FIGURE 3. A C and D).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Echiniscus quitensis
Pilato, Giovanni 2007 |
E. charrua
Claps & Rossi 1997 |