Catoclastus chevrolatii Solier, 1851
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.2478/aemnp-2019-0049 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E1EE6D56-D9E5-4EDD-B3F7-D99D8DD15035 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/50778797-FF9E-FFA7-0EF9-FBB5FE36F961 |
treatment provided by |
Marcus |
scientific name |
Catoclastus chevrolatii Solier, 1851 |
status |
|
Catoclastus chevrolatii Solier, 1851
( Figs 1A–J View Fig , 2A–I View Fig )
Catoclastus chevrolatii Solier, 1851: 96–97 (original description).
Catoclastus chevrolati: HAROLD (1869) : 1226 (incorrect subsequent spelling).
Catoclastus jaumesi Soula, 2010: 6 (original description), syn. nov.
Type material examined. Catoclastus chevrolatii Solier, 1851 : NEOTYPE: J ( MNHN), labeled: a) ‘chevrolati / Chili Solier’ [white label handwritten]; b) ‘ Neotype 2010 / Catoclastus / chevrolati / Solier Soula det.’ [red label typeset and handwritten];c) ‘MNHN / EC7026’ [white label typeset]. Catoclastus jaumesi Soula, 2010 : HOLOTYPE: J ( CCECL), labeled: a) ‘Matucana; Pérou / 2000m; II/2002 ’ [typeset white label]; b) ‘ Holotype / Catoclastus / jaumesi S. / 2010 Soula’ [red label typeset and handwritten]. ALLOTYPE: ♀ ( CCECL), labeled: a) ‘Matucana; Pérou / 2000m; II/2002 ’ [typeset white label]; b) ‘ Allotype / Catoclastus / jaumesi S. / 2010 Soula’ [red label typeset and handwritten].
Additional material examined. PERU: LORETO (1): Yurimarguas, Río Huallaga, III- 1997, 500 m (1 MSPC). LIMA (8): Atocongo (cerca de Lima), IX-1946 (1 MUSM); Callahuanca, IV-1976, R.García (1 MUSM); Chaute (Cocachacra), 2500 msnm, 15-III-1990, P. Hocking (1 MUSM); Surco, Peru (1 BMNH); Matucana (2 VMDC); Ferrogas Canyon, Lima (2 USNM). AYACUCHO (4): Ocaña, 3200 msnm, 7-II-1969 (1 MUSM), 25-III-1969, P. Hocking (3 MUSM). CUSCO (1): Valle Río Apurimac, XI-2011 (1 MSPC).
Non-examined material. PERU: LA LIBERTAD: Pacasmayo ( OHAUS 1918, 1934, 1952). AYACUCHO: Ocaña, 6-IV-1936 ( OHAUS 1952).
Diagnosis. Body dorsally metallic green, venter coppery green; legs reddish-brown ( Figs 2A–C, F–H View Fig ); head subtrapezoidal, with clypeal margins not reflexed; frontoclypeal suture not impressed; mandibles with two large, rounded, reflexed teeth ( Figs 1B View Fig , 2A, G View Fig ); labium hexagonal to semicircular, concave in anterior half ( Fig. 1G View Fig ). Pronotum with marginal bead complete. Elytron with weakly impressed striae, interstriae with strong transverse wrinkles; elytral base with dimple lateral of scutellar shield ( Figs 2A, F View Fig ). Humeral and apical umbones with prominent tubercles; sides behind humeral umbone narrowed, with margins projected externally. Claws simple on all legs (not toothed). Parameres symmetrical, fused dorsoventrally, with apex split (frontal view) ( Figs 2D–E, I View Fig ).
Comments. Catoclastus chevrolatii exhibit a strong intraspecific variation, represented mainly in the form of the parameres and pronotal sculpture. This variation has caused confusion with respect to the species’ identity. Within related ruteline scarabs, HARDY (1975) considered species to be of ‘variable entities’, and he allowed for intraspecific variation in coloration and even the form of male genitalia in some species of Pelidnota . In contrast, Soula’s species concept did not allow for intraspecific variation of species ( MOORE et al. 2017). In Soula’s works, slight differences in color, punctation, or form of male parameres resulted into new species and subspecies without considering the morphological variations and sexual dimorphism. Furthermore, Soula’s ruteline species were often based on a small number of specimens (generally one or two) and often based on one sex only. New species or subspecies were routinely named from the same population and collecting event (e.g., SOULA 2010).
The case of C. chevrolatii and C. jaumesi is one of many in which Soula indiscriminately described new species and subspecies without considering the natural morphological variation of a taxon, thus generating taxonomic and nomenclature problems that persist until today; these were partly resolved by MOORE & JAMESON (2013) and MOORE et al. (2017).
Natural history. Adults specimens have been collected from 400–3200 m. Collecting circumstances are unknown, but specimens are likely collected at light in forested areas. Temporal data of collected specimens are as follows: February (3), March (5), April (2), September (1), November (1).
Distribution. Peru: Ayacucho, Cusco, La Libertad, Lima and Loreto departments ( Fig. 4 View Fig ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Catoclastus chevrolatii Solier, 1851
Mondaca, José & Seidel, Matthias 2019 |
Catoclastus jaumesi
SOULA M. 2010: 6 |
Catoclastus chevrolati:
HAROLD E. VON 1869: 1226 |
Catoclastus chevrolatii
SOLIER A. J. J. 1851: 97 |