Pyrgodesmus Pocock, 1892
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5068.4.6 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E4A3743F-14A9-4292-AC55-56B7E7F0905C |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5714972 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/5038879D-CE2A-5503-90A1-2981FC67FE1E |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Pyrgodesmus Pocock, 1892 |
status |
|
Genus Pyrgodesmus Pocock, 1892 View in CoL
Type-species: Pyrgodesmus obscurus Pocock 1892 View in CoL , by monotypy.
Other species included: Pyrgodesmus permutatus ( Attems, 1936) , comb. nov.
Diagnosis of Pyrgodesmus
Pyrgodesmus seems to be particularly similar to Klimakodesmus in most somatic characters, as correctly noted by Carl (1932) and recently reinstated by Aswathy et al. (2021). Yet both genera are distinct primarily in gonopodal structure: hypertrophied coxites, a deep gonocoel and ribbon-shaped, unipartite, distally attenuating, but not acuminate telopodites ( Figs 5–8 View FIGURES 1–8 , 29 & 30 View FIGURES 19–30 ), vs. moderately incrassate, apparently smaller, subspherical or squarish coxites, each of which supports a strong and unipartite telopodite represented solely by a slender, strongly exposed, increasingly attenuating and acuminate solenomere. In addition, PM crests, including the one on the penultimate ring that overhangs and conceals the epiproct from above, are much higher and stronger, whereas DL reduced, in Pyrgodesmus compared to Klimakodesmus species ( Aswathy et al. 2021).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |