Crax cf. fasciolata (Lees & Pimm, 2015)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11606/1807-0205/2022.62.034 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/4F79C33A-FFD6-FFBB-F2EA-8C67FD23F9F9 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Crax cf. fasciolata |
status |
|
Crax cf. fasciolata View in CoL
Independent anecdotal evidence convincingly indicates that a curassow of the genus Crax occurred in the PCE until the 20 th century ( Pinto, 1952; Teixeira et al., 1987; Teixeira, 1992; Lees & Pimm, 2015).The species was painted, supposedly based on birds from the PCE,during the 17 th century in the then Dutch-controlled northeastern Brazil (see Marcgrave, 1648: 195; Teixeira, 2009: 117; reviewed by Teixeira, 1992). Later, oral testimonies from multiple old hunters in coastal Alagoas also indicated the past occurrence of“a curassow other than Pauxi mitu ” ( Pinto, 1952) or“a yellow-billed curassow” ( Teixeira,1992) in the region. Thus, both paintings of birds putatively from the PCE and multiple oral testimonies from hunters suggest the historic existence of a curassow of the genus Crax in the PCE. As speculated by other authors ( Pinto, 1946, 1952; Teixeira, 1992), it is possible that the PCE population of this curassow was related to C. f. pinima from eastern Amazonia. Such a distributional pattern makes sense from a biogeographical perspective because it matches the pattern of other bird lineages with an isolated population in the PCE and a sister population in eastern Amazonia, including Xenops minutus ( Burney, 2009) , Thamnophilus aethiops ( Thom & Aleixo, 2015) , Cercomacroides laeta and Dendrocolaptes medius .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.