Opsiphanes camena Staudinger, [1886]

Piovesan, Mônica, Casagrande, Mirna Martins & Mielke, Olaf Hermann Hendrik, 2022, Systematics of Opsiphanes Doubleday, [1849] (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae, Satyrinae, Brassolini): an integrative approach, Zootaxa 5216 (1), pp. 1-278 : 89-94

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5216.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:F9C92B91-42CF-4D2D-B315-14FF801815D4

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/4F391911-FFF5-FF9D-C3EF-FC64BB534BB0

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Opsiphanes camena Staudinger, [1886]
status

 

Opsiphanes camena Staudinger, [1886] View in CoL

( Figs 66–71 View FIGURE 66 View FIGURE67 View FIGURE 68 View FIGURE 69 View FIGURE 70 View FIGURE 71 )

Opsiphanes camena Staudinger, [1886] View in CoL , in Staudinger & Schatz. Exot. Schmett. 1 (15), [holotype] pl. 72 (male d, v).—Stauding- er, 1887, in Staudinger & Schatz. Exot. Schmett. 1 (18), p. 213; 1 male [holotype], Manizales, Cauca [recte Caldas], Colombia, collection Staudinger [MfN].— Stichel, 1902. Berl. ent. Ztschr. 46 (4): 514, 523.— Stichel, 1904, in Wytsman. Gen. Ins. 20, p. 20.— Röber, 1906. Soc. ent. 21 (4): 27.— Fassl, 1909. Soc. Ent. 24 (15): 116; biol.— Stichel, 1909. Das Tierreich 25: 53, 82.— Fruhstorfer, 1912, in Seitz. Gross-Schmett. Erde 5, p. 300.—Fassl, 1914. Ent. Rdsch. 31 (8): 44.—Fassl, 1916. Ent. Rdsch. 33 (5): 26.— Stichel, 1932. Lep. Cat. 51, p. 43.— Blandin, 1977. Publ. Lab. Zool. l‘École norm. sup., Paris, 9: 163, 177, 180, 216, 217; biogeogr.— D’Abrera, 1987. Butt. Neotrop. Reg. 3, p. 412, 413 (figs male d, v, female d).—Vélez & Salazar, 1991. Marip. Colombia, p. 156 (fig. male d); biol.— Bristow, 1991. Zool. Jour. Linn. Soc. 101 (3): 207, figs 2a (female d, v), 2b (male d, v).—Salazar, 1993. Shilap Revta. lepid. 21 (81): 38.—Salazar, 2002. Bol. cient. mus. hist. nat., Manizales, 6: 157—Salazar, 2003. Shilap Revta. lepid. 31 (124): 321, fig. 6 (male d).— Casagrande, 2004. Brassolini View in CoL , in Lamas (ed.) Checklist: Part 4A, Hesperioidea-Papilionoidea, in Heppner (ed.). Atlas Neotrop. Lep. 5A, p. 204.—D’Abrera, 2005. World Butt., p. 95, 246, pl. 126, fig. 2 (male v).— Austin et al., 2007. Bull. Allyn Mus. 150: 2.—Blandin et al., 2014. Eur. Jour. Tax. 71: 51; cit.— Matos-Maraví et al. 2021, Biol. Jour. Linn. Soc. 133 (3): 711, fig. 2 (phylogenetic tree); phylog.

Taxonomic history. Opsiphanes camena Staudinger, [1886] View in CoL is cited in reviews, catalogs, and checklists, with no taxonomic modifications since its description. Frustorfer (1912) reproduced the information provided by Fassl (1909). D’Abrera (1987) illustrated the female for the first time.

Type material. Opsiphanes camena Staudinger, [1886] was described based on the illustration of one male published in 1886 and diagnosed in 1887 by the same author. The holotype is deposited at the MfN, with the following labels: / Origin./ abgebildet/ Manizales Cauca Sthl. [= Steinheil]/ Zool. Mus. Berlin / Ops . n. spec. S. & G. v. Frontino./ O. camena /. ( Fig. 71 View FIGURE 71 ).

Diagnosis. Opsiphanes camena Staudinger, [1886] is distinguished from its congeners in having the DFW with an oblique band angled between M 1 and M 3 and interrupted in almost its entire length. DHW with a marginal and a submarginal band. VFW, on CuA 2 -2A, with a dark “>”-shaped spot ( Fig. 66a View FIGURE 66 ).

Male genitalia. Tegumen in dorsal view with rounded anterior margin and wider than the posterior margin; anterior projection of saccus in lateral view twice as long as dorsal arms of saccus; uncus in dorsal view with lateral carinae; valva without projections in the dorso-distal portion; aedeagus in dorsal view without sclerotization in the median proximal region; fultura inferior wider in the median portion ( Fig. 68 View FIGURE 68 ).

Female genitalia. Lamella antevaginalis as a narrow, sclerotized arch; lamella postvaginalis as a broad plate compared to other species, nearly the same size throughout its length; ostium membranous ( Fig. 69 View FIGURE 69 ).

Variation. FW, length: male: 42–47 mm (n=6), female: 46 mm (n=1). Size of the spots that form the oblique band. VFW, rectangular spot on CuA 2 -2A, in the distal region, completely dark or with only dark edges. VHW, size and shape of eyespots between Sc+R 1 and M 1, and between M 3 and CuA 2 ( Figs 66–67 View FIGURE 66 View FIGURE67 ).

Comments. Some features of the male and female genitalia of Opsiphanes camena are unique in the genus. However, it was not possible to obtain molecular data for this species. Opsiphanes camena is extremely rare in nature (Indiana Cristóbal Ríos-Málaver pers. comm.) and in collections, and it was possible to dissect only one male and one female, illustrated here .

Natural history. Egg greenish-yellow with well-marked longitudinal carina. Adults fly at sunset and have been seen feeding on cattle droppings ( Fassl 1909). Inhabits conserved forests of mountainous regions ( Fassl 1909; Blandin 1977; Indiana Cristóbal Ríos-Málaver pers. comm.).

Geographic distribution. Colombia (Valle del Cauca, Antioquia, Caldas); Blandin (1977) indicated the species as endemic to the Western Colombian Cordillera, but Matos-Maraví et al. (2021) recorded it in Ecuador (Napo) ( Fig. 70 View FIGURE 70 ). It occurs at altitudes between 2,000 and 2,400 m ( Fassl 1914a).

Temporal distribution. February, August.

Etymology. Unknown.

Specimens examined. Photos of the lectotypus of Opsiphanes camena Staudinger, [1886] , and the following specimens: COLOMBIA: Valle del Cauca — Río Aguacatal (Western Cordillera), 2,000 m, 1 male, Fassl leg., US- NMENT01590872 (USNM), 1 female, Fassl leg., ex-coll. E. T. Owen, USNMENT01590873 (USNM); Cali, 1,000 m, 19-II-1963, 1 male, DZ 48.800 (DZUP). Antioquia —La Unión (Mesopotamia), 150 m, 4 males, AMNH_IZC 00115272–00115275 (AMNH). Caldas —Samaná, (Parque Nacional Natural Selva de Florencia—camino a la Vereda San Lucas em bosque subandino), 5º31′02″N 75º03′15″W, 1,730 m, VIII-2018, I. C. Ríos-Málaver & M. A. Monsalve leg., atraída por ceviche de camarón.

3. “ zelotes subgroup”

Species included:

7. Opsiphanes zelotes Hewitson, 1873

8. Opsiphanes zelus Stichel, 1908 stat. nov.

Diagnosis. The species of the “ zelotes subgroup” are distinguished by the VFW and VHW predominantly whitishgray with violet shades. Males with monochromatic dark-brown DHW ( Figs 72–75 View FIGURE 72 View FIGURE 73 View FIGURE 74 View FIGURE 75 , 80 View FIGURE 80 ). It was possible to obtain molecular data only for Opsiphanes zelotes Hewitson, 1873 .

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Lepidoptera

Family

Nymphalidae

Genus

Opsiphanes

Loc

Opsiphanes camena Staudinger, [1886]

Piovesan, Mônica, Casagrande, Mirna Martins & Mielke, Olaf Hermann Hendrik 2022
2022
Loc

Opsiphanes camena

Staudinger 1886
1886
Loc

Opsiphanes camena

Staudinger 1886
1886
Loc

Brassolini

Boisduval 1836
1836
Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF