Anacroneuria itatiaiensis Baldin, Bispo & Novaes, 2013
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5360.3.4 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:57FC0A0F-ABA4-404E-BC12-E5B3316A56E2 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10164628 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/4E67E575-FF9A-FFAE-FF59-608BFE93E986 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Anacroneuria itatiaiensis Baldin, Bispo & Novaes, 2013 |
status |
|
Anacroneuria itatiaiensis Baldin, Bispo & Novaes, 2013 View in CoL
Fig. 4A–G View FIGURE 4
Material examined. BRA: MG, Municipality of Santo Antônio do Rio Abaixo, Santo Antônio River 19º13’52.41”S, 43º12’54.82”W, 475 m a.s.l., light trap, 10–11.i.2022, 5 males, A.Viana, P. Bonfá & P. Rodrigues GoogleMaps . MG, Municipality S„o José do Goiabal, Doce River, 20º0’52.78”S, 42º44’40.10”W, 258 m a.s.l., light trap, 12–13.i.2022, 4 males, A.Viana, P. Bonfá & P. Rodrigues GoogleMaps . MG, Municipality of Guaraciaba, Piranga River , 20º32’46.33”S, 42º59’25.25”W, 526 m a.s.l., light trap, 14–15.i.2022, 3 males, A.Viana, P. Bonfá & P. Rodrigues GoogleMaps . MG, Municipality of Rio Doce, Doce River 20°11’47.2”S 42°51’07.2”W, 282 m a.s.l, light trap, 10–11.viii.2022, 1 male. A.Viana, P. Bonfá & P. Rodrigues GoogleMaps . MG, Municipality of Mathias Lobato, Suaçuí Grande River , 18°34’23.5”S 41°56’52.3”W, 198 m a.s.l., light trap, 05–06.ix.2022, 2 males. A.Viana, P. Bonfá & A. Ataíde GoogleMaps . MG, Municipality of Jaguaraçu, Piracicaba River 19°37’00.8”S, 42°46’46.5”W, 254 m a.s.l., light trap, 10–11.i.2022, 1 male, A.Viana, P. Bonfá & P. Rodrigues. GoogleMaps ES, Municipality of Baixo Guandu, Guandu River 19°37’30.0”S 41°01’07.8”W, 188 m a.s.l., light trap, 09–10.ix.2022, 4 males, 5 females. A.Viana, P. Bonfá & A. Ataíde GoogleMaps .
Remarks. This species is distributed in southeastern Brazil, with records in the states of Rio de Janeiro ( Baldin et al. 2013) and Minas Gerais ( Novaes & Bispo 2014), being the most widely distributed species in the Doce River basin. The male forewing length of the specimens studied here (8.9–12.2mm, n=4) is similar to the forewing length range presented by Novaes & Bispo (2014). Furthermore, the penial armature matches with the illustrations in the original description.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |