Dissochaetus ovalis, Jeannel, 1936: 65
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4741.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:2F901615-D948-4C68-81E9-75282F594BAF |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4457570 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/4E4F5B3F-FFD0-8773-FF75-CD59FD71F674 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Dissochaetus ovalis |
status |
|
A. ovalis Jeannel, 1936: 65 View in CoL ;
Gnaspini, 1996: 539 (type seen); Gnaspini & Peck, 2001: 429 (assignment to group ascutellaris); Salgado, 2010c: 215 (assignment to group peruviensis); Gnaspini & Peck, 2019: 10, 13 (holotype seen [Note: Genital segment missing]; assignment back to group; and tentatively to subgroup).
Holotype male [a single specimen in original description, assumed as holotype] in MNHN (as Pic collection in original description).
Type locality: “ Venezuela ”.
Distribution: Venezuela: known only from “type locality”.
Note: Szymczakowski (1975: 14), when discussing identity of A. brunnea Jeannel [1936] and describing and assigning subspecies to that species, commented that it is probable that A. ovalis would also be synonym of A. brunnea ; and he proposed to use the latter as the valid name [but the former has page precedence] if this synonymy is proved right. This has never been used in the literature, and deserves further investigation—see also note about subspecies under A. brunnea . Gnaspini & Peck (2019: 14) considered both as valid species, and did not propose a revalidation because they understood that Szymczakowski´s statement is not a valid taxonomic act, a position followed here.
MNHN |
Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |