Amritodus Anufriev
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5462.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:64145254-E820-4248-8248-F5B259266592 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11626989 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/4D73DA02-FF81-FFCC-FF17-F9DEEDC2F8A8 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Amritodus Anufriev |
status |
|
Genus Amritodus Anufriev View in CoL
Amritodus Anufriev 1970: 376 View in CoL ; Viraktamath 1997: 112; Xue & Zhang 2020: 1445. Type species: Idiocerus atkinsoni Lethierry View in CoL , by original designation.
Diagnosis. Resembles species of Idioscopus but differs in the structure of male genitalia. Aedeagus S-shaped, with well-developed, long preatrium either as long as or longer than shaft, dorsal apodeme short, plate-like, shaft curved, tapered distally in lateral view, without long apical processes sometimes with short basal processes; style apophysis with apex curved, with dorsal marginal stout or slender setae, ventral surface smooth; male pygofer with slender spine-like ventral processes directed anteriorly in distal 0.33.
Description. Ochraceous to brown with pair of black roundish spots on crown fore margin, anterior submargin of pronotum and basal triangles on mesonotum, forewing venation dark brown and ovipositor black.
Crown not produced in front of eyes, 3.5–4.3× as wide between eyes as long medially, slightly longer in middle than next to eyes, transversely finely striate, fore margin rounded to face, upper part of face dorsad of ocelli striate. Face including eyes wider than long. Ocelli closer to adjacent eye than to each other. Lorum slightly raised from general surface. Clypellus rather abruptly widened at distal 0.25 and depressed. Labium exceeding metacoxae, in male the distal segment expanded laterally. Pronotum 2.1–2.5× as wide as long, longer than crown but shorter than mesonotum, surface shagreen, posterior margin slightly medially concave. Mesonotum about as long as combined length of crown and pronotum, mesoscutellum rough sculptured. Forewing with two subapical and four apical cells. Meta femoral distal macrosetae 2+1. Meta tibial chaetotaxy in row AD 6, PD 18–20, AV 6–8 macrosetae, and metabasitarsomere with four platellae on distal transverse row flanked by only one stout seta on one side ( Fig. 8I View FIGURES 8 ). Male abdomen with both tergal and sternal apodemes well-developed. Female sternite VII wider than long, posterior margin concave with lateral posterior angles produced posteriorly and lobe-like ( Figs 60 I–L View FIGURES 60 ).
Male genitalia. Pygofer height greater than its length, anterior margin with well-developed dorsal apodemes, posterodorsal angle rounded, dorsal margin with basal fracture, each pygofer lobe with transverse unpigmednted stripe at about mid-height, with long slender spine-like ventral process bent at distal 0.33 and reaching or exceeding dorsal margin. Subgenital plates with basal short segment, about as long as or shorter than pygofer, more or less of uniform width, with marginal thin hair-like setae. Style elongate, with short anterior part, apophysis distally slightly narrowed, with apex curved with dorsal marginal short either stout or thin setae, apical part variously curved, ventral surface not serrate or corrugated. Connective T-shaped, with prominent dorsal median keel. Aedeagus somewhat S-shaped, preatrium about as long as or longer than shaft, dorsal apodeme plate-like and short, shaft curved and narrowed distally in lateral view, without apical processes, may be with short lamellate or triangular projection, or with short thin basal pair of processes on ventral surface (as in A. brevistylus ), gonopore subapical on ventral surface.
Female genitalia. Ovipositor exceeding pygofer by 0.33–0.5 length of pygofer in lateral view. Valvula I slightly curved, distally narrowed with pointed apex, dorsal surface with short vertical to oblique strigae occupying dorsal half width and distal 0.6–0.7 length ( Figs 63I,J View FIGURES 63 ). Valvula II straight, with toothed area occupying distal 0.33 or less, teeth prominent, distinctly separated from each other and directed anteriorly ( Figs 63K,L View FIGURES 63 ).
Remarks. Several unrelated taxa were placed in this genus by the Chinese workers ( Huang & Maldonado-Capriles 1992; Cai et al. 2001, Cai & Shen 1998, Zhang & Li 2010) but were removed based on morphological phylogenetic analysis by Xue et al. (2020), making the genus more homogenous and monophyletic. The genus is now restricted to the Indian subcontinent, parts of China and Thailand. The genus now includes only four species all of which occur in the Indian subcontinent and breed on mango, Mangifera indica L. ( Anacardiaceae ).
Key to species of Amritodus Anufriev View in CoL
(Modified from Viraktamath 1997)
1. Subgenital plate half as long as pygofer in lateral view, devoid of long thin setae ( Fig. 9F View FIGURES 9 ); aedeagus with subapical flanges on either side near shaft apex ( Fig. 9G View FIGURES 9 ); female sternite VII posterior margin with median and lateral shallow concavity ( Fig. 60J View FIGURES 60 )................................................................................ A. brevis Viraktamath View in CoL
- Subgenital plate as long or longer than pygofer in lateral view and with marginal long thin setae ( Fig. 8J View FIGURES 8 ); aedeagus with basal pair of short processes on shaft ( Fig. 11H View FIGURES 11 ) or without processes ( Fig. 10J View FIGURES 10 ); female sternite VII with posterior margin deeply concave ( Figs 60 View FIGURES 60 IK,L)................................................................................. 2
2. Aedeagus with a pair of short process at base of shaft ( Fig. 11H View FIGURES 11 ); female sternite VII with posterior margin concave in median region ( Fig. 60K View FIGURES 60 )............................................................. A. quinquepunctatus (Melichar) View in CoL
- Aedeagus without such processes ( Fig. 8L View FIGURES 8 ); female sternite VII with posterior margin straighter in median region..........3
3. Style apex strongly curved dorsally, dorsal surface with stout setae ( Fig. 8K View FIGURES 8 ); aedeagus strongly sinuate, including preatrium almost S-shaped ( Fig. 8L View FIGURES 8 ); femlale sternite VII with posterior margin abruptly incurved laterally then straight ( Fig. 60I View FIGURES 60 )...................................................................................... A. atkinsoni (Lethierry) View in CoL
- Style apex not so strongly curved, dorsal surface with slender seta ( Fig. 10I View FIGURES 10 ); aedeagus not S-shaped, but with preatrium nearly straight, shaft smoothly curved ( Fig. 10J View FIGURES 10 ); female sternite VII with posterior margin concave with median region straight ( Fig. 60L View FIGURES 60 ).................................................................. .. A. saeedi Ahmed, Naheed & Ahmed View in CoL
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Eurymelinae |
Tribe |
Idiocerini |
Amritodus Anufriev
VIRAKTAMATH, C. A. & YESHWANTH, H. M. 2024 |
Amritodus
Xue, Q. Q. & Zhang, Y. L. 2020: 1445 |
Anufriev, G. A. 1970: 376 |