Onthophagus chevrolati, Harold, 1869

Halffter, Gonzalo, Zunino, Mario, Moctezuma, Victor & Sánchez-Huerta, José L., 2019, The integration processes of the distributional patterns in the Mexican Transition Zone: Phyletic, paleogeographic and ecological factors of a case study, Zootaxa 4586 (1), pp. 1-34 : 13-14

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4586.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D5DCFA99-B033-4F60-AAC1-D7F85DA85471

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5924994

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/4D66AD09-FFBF-D37A-97B2-FB62FBC148AC

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Onthophagus chevrolati
status

 

The Onthophagus chevrolati View in CoL species group

Venturing into a new kind of biogeographical-phyletic discussion, in which the processes of speciation are properly compared with the geological history of the mountains, requires an adequate knowledge of the taxonomy of the group to be studied. Zunino & Halffter (1988a), based on the morphology of copulation apparatuses and external morphological characters, established the O. chevrolati species group, which they consider to be one of the best taxonomically studied of the American fauna of Onthophagus . These authors included in the group 39 species and subspecies, and later discoveries increased its number of species.

Based on the monograph by Zunino and Halffter (1988a), whose approaches continue to be valid, we have updated some details of this group’s taxonomy using the results of recent studies ( Delgado & Capistan 1996; Delgado 1999; Sánchez-Huerta et al. 2015, 2018; Arriaga et al. 2016; Moctezuma et al. 2016; Gasca-Álvarez et al. 2018; Joaqui et al. in press). We have also studied the morphology of the genitalia in depth, carrying out a detailed, comparative analysis of the characters of all the species of the O. hippopotamus species complex, except for O. padrinoi of which we have not yet been able to examine the anatomy.

With respect to Zunino & Halffter (1988a) we consider the following changes. All formerly recognized subspecies are elevated to species status. Onthophagus mesoamericanus Zunino & Halffter, 1988 ( Fig. 9 View FIGURE 9 ) is provisionally considered a synonym of O. cyanellus ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 ). We consider O. cyanellus to be a species line, with the same rank as the O. chevrolati species line in which it was previously included. Within Onthophagus , the O. chevrolati species group is the model example of the Paleoamerican Mountain distributional sub-pattern, with the exception of O. cyanellus and related species that conform very well to the Paleoamerican Mesoamerican subpattern. The graphic representation of our taxonomic ideas (manually drawn in an intuitive manner, based on morphological similarity and supposed evolution) combined with the distribution of the lines is shown in Fig. 11 View FIGURE 11 .

To distinguish and delimit species, in this work we are following the phylogenetic species concept as defined by Wheeler & Platnick (2000): “The smallest aggregation of (sexual) populations or (asexual) lines diagnosable by a unique set of character states”. Consequently, all of the taxa considered as subspecies in the revision by Zunino & Halffter (1988a) are raised to the rank of species, since each has a set of diagnostic characters that allow it to be distinguished from the others, potentially representing different evolutionary histories.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Coleoptera

Family

Scarabaeidae

Genus

Onthophagus

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF