Elachistosuchus huenei Janensch, 1949
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.3897/fr.28.164405 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E2366C87-D1C3-4F5A-A21D-1A7A5D49BB8F |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17819406 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/4D4C621F-C72D-5D4E-9566-AD40996A36E6 |
|
treatment provided by |
by Pensoft |
|
scientific name |
Elachistosuchus huenei Janensch, 1949 |
| status |
|
Elachistosuchus huenei Janensch, 1949
Holotype.
MB. R. 4520 , nearly complete but crushed skull (Fig. 14 C View Figure 14 ) and partial postcranial skeleton including much of the shoulder girdle and a right humerus, preserved on six small blocks of matrix.
Type locality.
Baerecke-Limpricht brick-clay pit along the present-day highway B 79 between Halberstadt and Quedlinburg, near Halberstadt, Saxony-Anhalt.
Type horizon.
Arnstadt Formation, Middle Keuper Subgroup. Age: Late Triassic (Norian: Alaunian-Sevatian).
Diagnosis.
Distinguished by the following combination of features: frontal with distinct posterolateral process; maxillary tooth row extending back to posterior orbital margin; jugal with freely ending posterior process; palatine ramus of pterygoid covered with shagreen of teeth; angular exposed laterally for about one third of lateral surface of mandibular ramus; anterior margin of interclavicle notched; and posterior process of interclavicle spatulate ( Sobral et al. 2015).
Comments.
This taxon has been assigned to various diapsid clades since its original description. Janensch (1949) considered Elachistosuchus huenei a pseudosuchian based primarily on what he interpreted as an antorbital fenestra. Walker (1966) argued that it was a rhynchocephalian, incorrectly claiming that it has acrodont tooth implantation and reinterpreting the ‘ antorbital fenestra’ as the foramen for the lacrimal canal. Following a detailed anatomical description based on µCT-scans of the holotype, Sobral et al. (2015) attempted the first assessment of its relationships with phylogenetic analyses based on two character-taxon matrices available at the time. They recovered Elachistosuchus huenei as an archosauromorph, a lepidosauromorph, or a non-saurian diapsid. In a recent phylogenetic analysis using a much larger character-taxon matrix, Ezcurra and Sues (2021) found it as an early-diverging non-lepidosaurian lepidosauromorph.
References.
Janensch (1949), Walker (1966), Sobral et al. (2015), Ezcurra and Sues (2021).
| MB |
Universidade de Lisboa, Museu Bocage |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |
