Epimeria (Hoplepimeria) robusta, d’Acoz & Verheye, 2017

d’Acoz, Cédric d’Udekem & Verheye, Marie L., 2017, Epimeria of the Southern Ocean with notes on their relatives (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Eusiroidea), European Journal of Taxonomy 359, pp. 1-553 : 97-98

publication ID

https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2017.359

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3857520

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/4A5A879B-FFE6-681D-FE7C-FCE5CD9FFEC0

treatment provided by

Carolina (2020-05-26 13:47:48, last updated by Juliana 2025-01-14 17:34:16)

scientific name

Epimeria (Hoplepimeria) robusta
status

subgen. nov.

Epimeria (Hoplepimeria) robusta View in CoL subgen. nov. K.H. Barnard, 1930

Figs 209–211 View Fig View Fig View Fig

Epimeria robusta K.H. Barnard, 1930: 375 View in CoL , figs 40a, 41.

Epimeria inermis View in CoL – Walker 1907: 23, pl. 8 fig. 13.

Epimeria robusta View in CoL – Gurjanova 1955: 198. — J.L. Barnard 1961: 103 (key). — McCain 1971: 161. — De Broyer & Klages 1991: 164 (key, in part). — Coleman 1994: 560, in part, fig. 5C only.; 1998b: 223 (in part) — Wakabara & Serejo 1999: 643 (key). — Lörz et al. 2009: 16, figs 6–9. — Lörz & Coleman 2009: 17 View Cited Treatment , unnumbered photograph.

‘Clade G robusta-robustoides complex - R03’ – Verheye et al. 2016a, supplement: 4 (online).

non Epimeria inermis Walker, 1903: 54 View in CoL , pl. 10 fig. 69.

non Epimeria robusta View in CoL – Klages & Gutt 1990: 73, fig. 1A, 4A–D (= Epimeria (Hoplepimeria) robustoides View in CoL subgen. nov. Lörz & Coleman in Lörz et al., 2009).

Material examined

RV Seatruck cruises:

SOUTHERN OCEAN: 1 ♀, cruise REVOLTA I, stn REVO-043, Collect_ID: 436, Adélie Coast, 66°38ʹ28″ S, 140°01ʹ50″ E, 85–86 m, 26 Jan. 2010, coll. M. Eléaume, L. Hemery and A. D’Hont (MNHN-IU- 2009-2571) [extraction K1; Genbank nr, COI: KU870854 View Materials , 28S: KU759631 View Materials ].

Description

ROSTRUM. Medium-sized, nearly reaching tip of article 1 of peduncle of antenna 1, anteriorly straight, ventrally straight, narrow and subacute in lateral view; of medium width and with weakly curved converging borders in frontal view.

EYE. Very large, narrowly elliptic.

PEREION–PLEOSOME TOOTH PATTERN. Pereionites 1–7 smooth; pereionite 7 dorsally scarcely carinate; pleonite 1 with weak, straight mid-dorsal carina; pleonite 2 with weak straight mid-dorsal carina, posteriorly simply angulate but not forming a tooth; pleonite 3 dorsally weakly carinate with median extremely low (inconspicuous) rounded lobe, followed by inconspicuous concavity, terminated by a narrow but blunt-tipped tooth directed upwards.

COXAE 1–3. Not carinate, apically blunt.

COXA 4. Anterodorsal border very weakly sigmoid, anteroventral border straight, these two borders being joined by very broad, blunt but very distinct squared angle (anterior corner), which is slightly projecting forward; ventral corner forming an obtuse sharp angle (ventral projection short and fairly broad); lateral carina absent; posteroventral border straight.

COXA 5. Broad, with surface smooth, with posterior border straight, with posteroventral corner forming a very blunt tooth (shape: acute triangle) projecting backwards and not laterally (no tooth or corner visible in dorsal view).

COXA 6. With posterior border straight, with posteroventral corner forming a blunt tooth (shape: narrow acute triangle) projecting backwards and not laterally (no tooth or corner visible in dorsal view).

COXA 7. Posteriorly very weakly rounded.

EPIMERAL PLATES 1–3. Posteroventral angle: angulate in plate 1, produced into a medium-sized tooth in plates 2–3.

UROSOME TOOTH PATTERN. Urosomite 1 with well developed blunt-tipped process of which the anterior border is distinctly concave and the posterior border is nearly straight; urosomite 3 with dorsolateral borders distinctly concave and posteriorly produced into a sharp triangular tooth.

TELSON. Cleft on 0.15; tips of lobes triangular and blunt, notch very broadly V-shaped and blunt at its deepest point.

GNATHOPODS 1–2. Carpus and propodus very broad; propodus expanding distally, palm distinct.

PEREIOPODS 5–7. Merus, carpus and propodus fairly broad; dactylus small, normally curved, with unguis normally developed; basis of pereiopods 5–6 broad, with posteroproximal process present, swordlike, projecting obliquely, with posterodistal corner produced into a subacute to sharp triangular tooth projecting obliquely backwards; basis of pereiopod 7 broad; posterior border with proximal 0.4 weakly rounded, with distal 0.6 deeply concave, with posterodistal corner forming a sharp triangular tooth projecting obliquely backwards.

Colour pattern

Body and coxae either yellowish, sometimes with two pairs of small yellowish spots transversally ordered on some body segments or alternatively pale yellowish with a few tiny dark dots; pereiopods and mouthparts often tinged with pink; eyes red ( Lörz et al. 2009: 111, fig. 10 B–D).

Body length

Up to 43 mm.

Distribution

Adélie Coast to western Ross Sea, 85–814 m ( Lörz et al. 2009; present material).

Biology

K.H. Barnard (1930) found epicaridean isopods in the marsupium of E. robusta .

Remarks

Epimeria robusta s. str. is known from Adélie Coast and the western Ross Sea. Records from the Weddell Sea and the Scotia Region are based on its close relatives E. robustoides and E. gargantua sp. nov. Epimeria robusta can be easily distinguished from its relatives by the dentition of its pleosome (see key of Hoplepimeria subgen. nov. species).

Barnard K. H. 1930. Crustacea. Part XI. Amphipoda. British Antarctic ( Terra Nova ) Expedition, 1910. Natural History Report, Zoology 8 (4): 307 - 454. Available from http: // www. biodiversitylibrary. org / item / 195187 # page / 7 / mode / 1 up [accessed 12 Sep. 2017].

Barnard J. L. 1961. Gammaridean Amphipoda. Galathea Report 5: 23 - 128. Available from http: // www. zmuc. dk / inverweb / Galathea / Pdf _ filer / Volume _ 05 / galathea-vol. 05 - pp _ 023 - 128. pdf [accessed 27 Sep. 2016].

Coleman C. O. 1994. A new Epimeria species (Crustacea: Amphipoda: Epimeriidae) and redescriptions of three other species in the genus from the Antarctic Ocean. Journal of Natural History 28 (3): 555 - 576. https: // doi. org / 10.1080 / 00222939400770251

De Broyer C. & Klages M. 1991. A new Epimeria (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Paramphithoidae) from the Weddell Sea. Antarctic Science 3 (2): 159 - 166. https: // doi. org / 10.1017 / S 0954102091000196

Gurjanova E. F. 1955. New species of gammarideans (Amphipoda, Gammaridea) from the northern part of the Pacific Ocean. Trudy Zoologicheskogo Instituta Leningrad 18: 166 - 218 [in Russian].

Klages M. & Gutt J. 1990. Comparative studies on the feeding behaviour of high Antarctic amphipods (Crustacea) in laboratory. Polar Biology 11 (1): 73 - 79. https: // doi. org / 10.1007 / BF 00236524

Lorz A. - N. & Coleman O. 2009. Living gems: jewel-like creatures from the deep. Water & Atmosphere 17 (1): 16 - 17. Available from https: // www. niwa. co. nz / sites / niwa. co. nz / files / import / attachments / gems. pdf [accessed 27 Sep. 2016].

McCain J. C. 1971. A new deep-sea species of Epimeria (Amphipoda, Paramphithoidae) from Oregon. Crustaceana 20 (2): 159 - 166. https: // doi. org / 10.1163 / 156854069 X 00187

Verheye M., Backeljau T. & d'Udekem d'Acoz C. 2016 a. Looking beneath the tip of the iceberg: diversification of the genus Epimeria on the Antarctic shelf (Crustacea, Amphipoda). In: Gutt J., David B. & Isla E. (eds) High environmental variability and steep biological gradients in the waters off the northern Antarctic Peninsula. Polar Biology 39 (5): 925 - 945, online supplementary material https: // doi. org / 10.1007 / s 00300 - 016 - 1910 - 5

Wakabara Y. & Serejo C. S. 1999. Amathillopsidae and Epimeriidae (Crustacea, Amphipoda) from bathyal depths off the Brazilian coast. Zoosystema 21 (4): 625 - 645.

Walker A. O. 1903. Amphipoda of the Southern Cross Antarctic Expedition. Journal of the Linnean Society of London, Zoology 29: 38 - 64, pls 7 - 11. http: // biodiversitylibrary. org / page / 31597966 [accessed 27 Sep. 2016].

Walker A. O. 1907. Crustacea. III. Amphipoda. National Antarctic Expedition 1901 - 1904. Natural History 3. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 18281

Gallery Image

Fig. 209. Epimeria (Hoplepimeria) robusta subgen. nov. K.H. Barnard, 1930, sex undetermined, Adélie Coast, CEAMARC V3 1168, colour in life (photograph: Frédéric Busson, MNHN). Specimen not examined.

Gallery Image

Fig. 210. Epimeria (Hoplepimeria) robusta subgen. nov. K.H. Barnard, 1930, adult ♀, Adélie Coast, Revolta I, REVO-043, MNHN-IU-2009-2571. A. Lateral habitus. B. Dorsal habitus.

Gallery Image

Fig. 211. Epimeria (Hoplepimeria) robusta subgen. nov. K.H. Barnard, 1930, adult ♀, Adélie Coast, Revolta I, REVO-043, MNHN-IU-2009-2571. A. Facial habitus. B. Urosome and pleon in dorsal view.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

SubPhylum

Crustacea

Class

Malacostraca

Order

Amphipoda

SuperFamily

Eusiroidea

Family

Epimeriidae

Genus

Epimeria

SubGenus

Hoplepimeria