Phanerotoma mesocellata, Achterberg, 2021
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1014.60426 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/49F43ADF-66C5-5366-AEFD-8F4815B1E4D5 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Phanerotoma mesocellata |
status |
sp. nov. |
Phanerotoma mesocellata sp. nov. Figs 235-238 View Figures 235–238 , 239-249 View Figures 239–249
Type material.
Holotype, ♀ (RMNH), " United Arab Emirates, Sharjah Desert Park (15613), light trap, 1-30.iv.2007, 25°17'N, 55°42'E, A. v. Harten, RMNH’10”. Paratypes: 1♀: Idem, 22.iii.-5.iv.2009; 1♀: Idem, 29.iii.-6.iv.2005; 5♀, 1♂: Idem, 23-30.iv.2005; 13♀, 2♂: Idem, 30.iv.-7.v.2005; 11♀: Idem, 6-13.iv.2005; 1♀: Idem, 21-29.iii.2005; 1♀: "United Arab Emirates, Sharjah (2279), light trap, 30.vi.-21.vii.2005, 25°21'N, 55°24'E, A. v. Harten, RMNH’05”; 1♀: Idem, 2.v.-5.vi.2005; 3♀: "United Arab Emirates, Fujairah (2438), light trap, 2.v.-5.vi.2005, 25°08'N, 56°21'E, A. v. Harten, RMNH’06”; 1♀: Idem, 5-24.iii.2005; 6♀: "United Arab Emirates, NARC near Sweihan (1245), light trap, 28.iii.-2.iv.2005, 24°24'N, 55°26'E, A. v. Harten, RMNH’06”; 4♀: Idem, 2-9.iv.2005; 22♀, 3♂: Idem, 9-20.iv.2005; 1♀: Idem, 14-28.iii.2005; 8♀, 3♂: "United Arab Emirates, Wadi Bih dam (11366), light trap, 24.iv.-23.v.2007, 25°48'N, 56°04'E, A. v. Harten, RMNH’10”; 4♀, 1♂: Idem, 13-30.iv.2008; 1♀: Idem, 19.ii.-29.iii.2007; 1♀: "United Arab Emirates, Hatta (11572), light trap, 21.vi.-19.vii.2006, 24°49'N, 56°07'E, A. v. Harten, RMNH’09”; 1♂: "United Arab Emirates, Sharjah x Khor Kalba (11542), light trap, 24°59'N, 56°09'E, 28.iii.-5.iv.2006, A. v. Harten, RMNH’10”; 4♀: " Yemen (5697), Al Kowd, light trap, iv.2001, A. van Harten & S. Al Haruri, RMNH’02”; 5♀: Idem, 16-20.viii.2001; 6♀: Idem, 8-12.vii.2001; 22♀, 1♂: Idem, 27-31.vii.2001; 5♀: Idem, 6-10.viii.2001; 7♀: Idem, v.-vi.2000; 14♀, 3♂: Idem, vii.1999; 2♀: Idem, ii.2000; 1♀: Idem, vii.2000; 7♀: Idem, viii.2000; 2♀: Idem, xii.2000; 1♀: Idem, viii.1999; 3♀: Idem, 21-25.viii.2001; 2♀, 1♂: Idem, vii.-ix.2001; 2♀: Idem, vi.2002; 4♀: Idem, ix.2003; 3♀: Idem, i.-iii.2003; 15♀, "Yemen (6090), Al Kadan, light trap, x.2001, A. van Harten & T. Abdul-Haq, RMNH’03”; 2♀: Idem, iv.2002; 14♀, 1♂: Idem, v.2002; 2♀, 1♂: Idem, i.2003; 7♀: Idem, xi.2001; 9♀: "Yemen (5404), Hamman’Ali, from coffee berries (with Ceratitis capitata ?), 14.iii.2001, A. van Harten, RMNH’02”; 4♀: "Yemen (6381), Ta’izz, light trap, ix.-x.2001, A. van Harten & A.R. Al Yarimi, RMNH"; 1♀: Idem, ix.1999; 3♀: Idem, x.1999; 6♀: Idem, xi.1999; 4 ♀: Idem, xii.1999; 8♀: Idem, i.2000; 12♀: Idem, v.2000; 17♀: Idem, ix.2000; 2♀, 1♂: Idem, 5.i.-2.ii.1998; 15♀: Idem, 26-28.vii.1999; 16♀, 1♂: Idem, 3-24.i.1999; 17♀, 1♂: Idem, viii.2000; 1♀: Idem, 27-31.vii.2001; 7♀: Idem, x.2001; 3♀: Idem, iii.-iv.2001; 5♀: Idem, vi.2002; 6♀, 1♂: Idem, vii.2002; 6♀: "Yemen (3645), Sana’a, light trap, iii.-iv.1999, A. van Harten, RMNH’00”; 1♀: Idem, v.1999; 1♀: "Yemen (6667), 12 km NW Manakhah, Mal[aise] trap, 27.iii.-5.v.2002, A. v. Harten, RMNH’03”; 1♀: "Yemen, Seyun, light trap, 4-6.ix.2002, A. van Harten, RMNH’03”; 3♀: "Yemen (6158), Al Lahima, 17.ix.-14.xi.2001, Mal[aise] trap, A. v. Harten, RMNH’02”.
Diagnosis.
Eighth-tenth antennal segments from apex of ♀ moderately moniliform, stocky, matt or slightly shiny, 14th segment from apex somewhat longer than wide (Figs 248 View Figures 239–249 , 249 View Figures 239–249 ); stemmaticum black or dark brown, but sometimes brownish yellow; mesosternum more or less shiny; second submarginal cell of fore wing comparatively short (Fig. 239 View Figures 239–249 ); POL of ♀ 0.4-0.6 × width of posterior ocellus; eye 1.2-1.8 × as wide as median width of temple in lateral view (Fig. 247 View Figures 239–249 ); vein 1-M (as usually parastigma) slightly darker than yellow M+CU1 of fore wing (Fig. 235 View Figures 235–238 ); ovipositor sheath narrow apically (Figs 235 View Figures 235–238 , 242 View Figures 239–249 ). Closely related to P. ocularis and differs mainly by the shape of the apical antennal segments of the female, the more curved vein 2-SR and the size of the ocelli.
Description.
Female, holotype, length of body (excluding ovipositor) 3.6 mm; antenna 2.7 mm; fore wing 2.6 mm; visible part of ovipositor sheath 0.4 mm (erect setae mostly concentrated at apex).
Head. Width 1.7 × median length in anterior view and part of head above eye in lateral view 0.25 × height of eye (Fig. 247 View Figures 239–249 ); antenna with 23 cylindrical segments, slightly widened submedially and slightly longer than fore wing, seven apical antennal segments small and moniliform (Fig. 249 View Figures 239–249 ), with short bristles and apical segment with spine, third, fourth and penultimate segments 2.6, 2.4 and 1.4 × longer than wide in lateral view, respectively; area of stemmaticum coriaceous; OOL: diameter of posterior ocellus: POL = 15: 5: 3; length of eye 2.2 × temple in dorsal view (Fig. 245 View Figures 239–249 ); frons with weak median carina, mainly coriaceous, rather shiny and laterally rugulose; vertex rugulose-coriaceous and rather matt, posteriorly also with some transverse rugulae and distinctly emarginate (Fig. 245 View Figures 239–249 ); temple mainly coriaceous and rather matt, nearly parallel-sided in lateral view (Fig. 247 View Figures 239–249 ), gradually narrowed behind eyes; face transversely rugose laterally, rugulose and with obsolescent median bump and with satin sheen; clypeus smooth, moderately shiny and 0.9 × as wide as minimum width of face, intertentorial distance 3.6 × minimum width between clypeus and eye, long erect setose and with three distinct blunt teeth medio-ventrally (Fig. 246 View Figures 239–249 ); eye large, strongly convex and in lateral view 1.8 × wider than temple (measured medially; Fig. 247 View Figures 239–249 ), in anterior view its height 0.8 × minimum width of face (Fig. 246 View Figures 239–249 ); upper condyle of mandible above lower level of eyes (Fig. 246 View Figures 239–249 ); malar space mostly smooth, rather shiny and 0.4 × as long as basal width of mandible; lower tooth of mandible 0.2 × as long as apical tooth, small (Fig. 244 View Figures 239–249 ).
Mesosoma (Figs 235 View Figures 235–238 , 240 View Figures 239–249 ). Length 1.5 × its width in lateral view; side of pronotum coriaceous dorsally and remainder rugose; posteriorly propleuron bulging near central groove; mesosternum finely granulate and with satin sheen; mesoscutum densely reticulate-rugose on granulate background, with satin sheen, notauli absent; scutellum nearly flat, finely granulate-rugulose; scutellar sulcus medium-sized, with eight carinae (Fig. 240 View Figures 239–249 ); metanotum with median carina and minute medio-posterior tooth, its posterior border finely serrate; propodeum coarsely reticulate-rugose, on median-sized dorsal face less coarsely rugose, with transverse carina, no median carina, and latero-posteriorly weakly tuberculate. Wings. Fore wing 2.7 × longer than its maximum width; 1-R1 1.3 × as long as pterostigma; distance between wing apex and marginal cell apex 0.25 × length of 1-R1; r issued far beyond middle of pterostigma and 0.2 × 3-SR; 2-SR weakly curved and slightly converging to posterior margin of pterostigma (Fig. 239 View Figures 239–249 ); SR1 curved; m-cu interstitial; parastigma large; 1-CU1 0.5 × as long as vein 2-CU1, cu-a 0.9 × 1-CU1, strongly inclivous; r:3-SR:SR1 = 4:19:49; 2-SR:3-SR:r-m = 28:19:9; r-m reclivous; 2-M slightly curved (Fig. 239 View Figures 239–249 ). Hind wing: M+CU:1-M:1r-m = 22:17:10. Legs. Hind femur rather matt, 3.3 × as long as wide and robust; hind tibia swollen (Fig. 243 View Figures 239–249 ); middle tibia with medium-sized blister; inner spur of middle tibia 0.5 × its basitarsus; hind coxa largely superficially granulate, but dorsally partly smooth and rather shiny.
Metasoma (Figs 241 View Figures 239–249 , 242 View Figures 239–249 ). Oval in dorsal view, 1.6 × as long as wide and 1.2 × as long as mesosoma; first and second tergites irregularly and coarsely longitudinally rugose; second metasomal suture rather wide and straight; third tergite 1.5 × longer than second tergite and laterally curved, convex medially, rounded posteriorly in dorsal view (Fig. 241 View Figures 239–249 ), obtuse posteriorly in lateral view (Fig. 242 View Figures 239–249 ), densely reticulate-rugose and with satin sheen (Fig. 241 View Figures 239–249 ), lateral lamella narrow basally, but widened near apical half of third tergite and latero-apically, medio-apically somewhat barrower and concave; ovipositor sheath narrow, apically slightly widened and darkened (Fig. 242 View Figures 239–249 ), its visible part 0.16 × as long as fore wing and 0.28 × metasomal carapace, and with erect setae mainly near its apex; hypopygium of ♀ with short widely triangular and up curved apical protuberance (Fig. 242 View Figures 239–249 ) and with mostly medium-sized setae.
Colour. Pale brownish yellow; stemmaticum blackish; apex of antenna, hind tibia apically and subbasally and apex of ovipositor sheath rather brown; parastigma partly brownish, remainder and vein 1-M yellow; clypeus, palpi, tegulae, remainder of legs, mesoscutum medio-posteriorly, first and second tergites and metasoma ventrally pale yellowish or ivory; pterostigma (but basally and apically pale yellowish) and most veins brown; wing membrane slightly brownish below pterostigma and near vein 1-CU1.
Male.
Similar to female (including hind femur; Fig. 237 View Figures 235–238 ), but antenna slenderer (Fig. 236 View Figures 235–238 ).
Variations.
Length of fore wing of ♀ 2.1-2.7 mm (mainly UAE; many specimens from Yemen are larger (2.9-3.6 mm) because of using larger hosts), of ♂ 2.1-2.2 mm (UAE; Yemen 2.3-3.2 mm); vein 1-M of fore wing and parastigma pale yellowish, but sometimes more or less brown; second tergite brownish yellow or brown laterally; stemmaticum usually dark brown, but sometimes brownish yellow.
Biology.
Unknown.
Distribution.
United Arab Emirates, Yemen.
Etymology.
Named after its intermediate sized ocelli (meso is Greek for middle).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |