Stigmatomma bolabola Esteves & Fisher,

Esteves, Flavia A. & Fisher, Brian L., 2016, Taxonomic revision of Stigmatomma Roger (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in the Malagasy region, Biodiversity Data Journal 4, pp. 8032-8032: 8032

publication ID

http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8032

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5AE871B6-46CB-4BEF-8E4D-19C0F05BDBFA

persistent identifier

http://treatment.plazi.org/id/05D881B6-3EBA-4D5D-863F-135430794C5D

taxon LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:act:05D881B6-3EBA-4D5D-863F-135430794C5D

treatment provided by

Biodiversity Data Journal by Pensoft

scientific name

Stigmatomma bolabola Esteves & Fisher
status

sp. n.

Stigmatomma bolabola Esteves & Fisher  ZBK  sp. n.

Materials

Type status: Holotype. Occurrence: catalogNumber: casent0034580; recordedBy: Fisher, Griswold et al.; sex: 1w; preparations: pin; associatedMedia: http://www.antweb.org/specimen/casent0034580; Taxon: scientificName: Stigmatommabolabola; genus: Stigmatomma; Location: country: Madagascar; locality: Montagne d'Akirindro 7.6 km 341° NNW Ambinanitelo ; decimalLatitude: -15.28833; decimalLongitude: 49.54833; georeferenceRemarks: coordinates obtained from GPS; Event: eventDate: 03/17/2003; habitat: rainforest; fieldNumber: BLF08250; eventRemarks: sifted litter (leaf mold, rotten wood); Record Level: institutionCode: CASCGoogleMaps  Type status: Other material. Occurrence: catalogNumber: casent0034744; recordedBy: Fisher, Griswold et al.; sex: 1w; preparations: pin; associatedMedia: http://www.antweb.org/specimen/casent0034744; Taxon: scientificName: Stigmatommabolabola; genus: Stigmatomma; Location: country: Madagascar; locality: Montagne d'Anjanaharibe, 19.5 km 27° NNE Ambinanitelo ; decimalLatitude: -15.17833; decimalLongitude: 49.635; georeferenceRemarks: coordinates obtained from GPS; Event: eventDate: 03/12/2003; habitat: montane rainforest; fieldNumber: BLF08150; eventRemarks: sifted litter (leaf mold, rotten wood); Record Level: institutionCode: CASCGoogleMaps 

Description

Worker (Fig. 28); only the holotype was measured): HL: 0.76; HW: 0.59; HW2: 0.49; SL: 0.45; ML: 0.41; WL: 0.92; PPW: 0.34; PtL: 0.29; PtW: 0.41; CI: 78; SI: 60; MI: 54; PtI: 72.

Head:

Mandibular baso-masticatory margin skirted dorsally by row of filiform setae; ventrally, by acuminate flattened-apex setae, and row of longer filiform setae (Fig. 29a). Mandibular dentition arrangement, from base to apex: row of three single teeth (same dimensions of teeth arranged in pairs); three pairs of teeth (each teeth pair fused basally); single preapical tooth; apical tooth (Fig. 29a). Dorsal teeth pairs increasing in length towards mandibular apex. Anterior clypeal margin with nine tubercle-like cuticular processes arranged in a single row. All clypeal cuticular processes, except the most lateral, armed anteriorly with truncated dentiform seta; most lateral processes smaller and unarmed (Fig. 29a). Median clypeal cuticular processes around 3x the length of associated dentiform setae. Pair of long filiform setae on clypeal median area, posterior to tubercle-like cuticular processes on clypeal anterior margin. Pair of shorter filiform setae on clypeal median area posterior to longer setae pair, followed posteriorly by longitudinal row of much shorter filiform setae. Clypeal median area extending posteriorly between antennal sockets as narrow longitudinal strip; frontoclypeal sulcus acute. Supraclypeal area as oval shaped concavity (Fig. 29b). Twelve antennomeres. Genal teeth absent (Fig. 29b). Widest diameter of compound eyes: 2-3 ommatidia (Fig. 29c). Palpal formula: 4:2 (four maxillary, two labial; Fig. 29d).

Mesosoma:

In dorsal view, mesonotum narrower than remaining mesosoma (Fig. 30a). Metanotal suture absent (Fig. 30a). Sulcus divinding mesepisternum into anepisternum and katepisternum; posterodorsal corner of katepisternum rounded (Fig. 30b). Metathoracic spiracle slit-like, reduced in size (Fig. 30b). Propodeal spiracle round, surrounded by cuticular swell, followed by sulcus (Fig. 30b). Propodeal declivitous face not concave.

Legs:

Basoventral fifth of calcar of strigil lamellar (Fig. 31b). Calcar of strigil anterior face with tubiform microtrichia (Fig. 31a); posterior face with lanceolate microtrichia (Fig. 31b). Multiple paddle-like setae on anteroventral face of protibial apex, next to calcar of strigil (Fig. 31a). Multiple paddle-like setae on anterior face of probasitarsus (Fig. 31a); stout setae on apex of posterior face (Fig. 31b). Single mesotibial spur with lanceolate microtrichia (Fig. 31c). Slit-like longitudinal sulcus on anterodorsal face of mesobasitarsus (Fig. 31d). Row of stout setae along inner face of mesobasitarsus (Fig. 31c). Two metatibial spurs; simple anterior spur with lanceolate microtrichia; posterior spur pectinate (Fig. 31e). Anterior face of posterior metatibial spur glabrous (Fig. 31e); posterior face with antler-like microtrichia. Brush of long, truncated filiform setae on posterior face of metatibial apex, next to posterior metatibial spur. Absence of longitudinal sulcus on anterodorsal face of metabasitarsus (Fig. 31e). Brush of tubiform setae on baso-inner face of metabasitarsus. Stout setae on remaining inner face of metabasitarsus. Arolium on pro-, meso-, and metapretarsus.

Metasoma:

Petiole sessile (Fig. 32a). Ventroanterior margin of petiolar tergite anterior dorso-latero-ventral carina (Ward 1990) much shorter than anterior margin of subpetiolar process, in lateral view. Subpetiolar process with obtuse angle at mid-point of its ventral margin (fin-like; Fig. 32a). Absence of fenestra on lateral face of subpetiolar process (Fig. 32a). Petiolar proprioceptor zone a large, round concavity with few sensilla (Fig. 32b). Prora present (Fig. 32a). Scrobiculate sulcus between pretergite and postergite of abdominal segment III and presclerites and postsclerites of abdominal segment IV (Fig. 32c). Eight stout spiniform setae on apex of hypopygium (Fig. 32d).

Sculpture:

Mandibular dorsal face rugose-foveate basally, grading into costate-foveolate apically except for smooth apical portion (Fig. 29a). Clypeal median area costate. Supraclypeal area smooth. Head, in dorsal view, mostly foveate-reticulate/densely foveate; area posterior to tentorial pit plicate (Fig. 29b). Labrum rugose (Fig. 33a). Mesosoma foveate dorsally (Fig. 30a). Pronotum rugulose-foveate laterally (Fig. 33b). Anepisternum scarcely costulate; katepisternum costate-rugulose (Fig. 30b). Metapleuron mostly costate (Fig. 30b). Lateral face of propodeum costate-foveolate; declivitous face strigate (Fig. 30). Petiolar tergite, in lateral view, areolate/imbricate ventroanteriorly, grading into strigate dorsoanteriorly, costate laterally, foveate dorsally (Fig. 33c). Petiolar laterotergite imbricate posteriorly (Fig. 32b). Petiolar poststernite mostly alveolate, grading into smooth ventrally (Fig. 32b). Abdominal segment III foveolate; remaining gaster puncticulate (Fig. 32c).

Pilosity and color:

Suberect pilosity on head, dorsal face of mesosoma, lateral face of propodeum, petiolar tergite, and abdominal segments III and IV. Petiolar poststernite mostly glabrous. Longer pilosity on abdominal segments V, VI and VII. Body color red-brown; apex of gaster and appendages orange-yellow.

Comments on character variation

Character variation on the specimens examined was minimal.

Other castes

Unknown.

Specimens used in prior studies

This taxon was referenced as Stigmatomma  MG03 (specimen CASENT0034580) in Ward and Fisher (2016).

Diagnosis

Worker

With characters of the tsyhady  species-group and the sakalava  species-complex as described above, and the following characters (asterisks flag unique characters within the genus in the Malagasy bioregion):

Integument red-brown; medium-sized ant (HL: 0.76, WL: 0.92; Fig. 28).

Dorsal teeth row of mandible’s pairs of teeth increasing in size towards mandibular apex (Fig. 29a).

Row of acuminate flattened-apex setae setae ventrally skirting mandible’s baso-masticatory margin, parallel to row of flexuous, longer setae (Figs 29a, 33a).

Dorsal face of the head mostly foveate-reticulate/densely foveate (Figs 28a, 29b).

Genal teeth absent (Figs 28a, 29b).

Palpal formula 4:2 (Fig. 29d).

Dorsal face of mesosoma foveate; lateral face of pronotum rugulose-foveate; lateral face of propodeum costate-foveolate (Figs 30, 33b).

* Declivitous face of propodeum strigate (Fig. 30a).

* Mesepisternum divided into anepisternum and katepisternum; posterodorsal corner of katepisternum rounded (Fig. 30b).

* Basoventral one-fifth of calcar of strigil lamellar (Fig. 31b).

Calcar of strigil anterior face with tubiform microtrichia (Fig. 31a).

Single mesotibial spur covered with lanceolate microtrichia (Fig. 31c).

Longitudinal slit-like sulcus present on the anterodorsal face of mesobasitarsus (Fig. 31d).

Anterior face of posterior metatibial spur glabrous; posterior face with antler-like microtrichia (Fig. 31e).

Brush of long truncated-apex filiform setae present on the posterior face of metatibial apex.

Brush of tubiform setae present on the baso-inner face of metabasitarsus.

Absence of sulcus on metabasitarsus (Fig. 31e).

Subpetiolar process fin-like: half of its ventral margin obtusely angled (Fig. 32a).

Eight stout spiniform setae present on the apex of hypopygium (Fig. 32d).

Stigmatomma bolabola  may be confounded with S. sakalava  by the following characters: absence of genal teeth, palpal formula, single mesotibial spur, head sculpture, shape of subpetiolar process, and presence of stout spiniform setae on the apex of hypopygium. However, it is easily recognized by the sculpture of its mesosoma lateral face and propodeal declivitous face, katepisternum shape, proportion of lamella on the basoventral margin of calcar of strigil, and distribution (since they do not occur in sympatry).

Etymology

Bola--bola is the name that Malagasy people give to logs of rosewood, a plant of the genus Dalbergia  ( Schuurman 2009). Stigmatomma bolabola  is named for the resemblance between its color and that of rosewood timber, and because it lives in the region of Madagascar most affected by illegal rosewood logging.

Madagascar is home to 48 species of rosewood, of which 47 are endemic ( Barrett et al. 2010). Of the 20 endangered species and 15 vulnerable species of rosewood, about 16 species are unsustainably exploited for their timber and known locally as bois de rose ( IUCN 2015).

Due to international demand for rosewood, thousands of loggers have flooded into the national parks of Madagascar. In the process of extraction, new roads are built, and logging camps set up, which increases access to forests, fuels extraction of other resources, and accelerates general deforestation, illegal mining, and poaching ( Barrett et al. 2010, Patel 2007). That is why, beyond the reduction or extinction of rare trees, rosewood logging is inextricably linked to reduction of native species diversity, invasion of non--native species, and landscape aridification ( Patel 2007). Unfortunately, due to the low density of rosewood trees in the wild, loggers routinely search for new territories, initiating a new cycle of destruction ( Barrett et al. 2010).

The highest rosewood species richness in Madagascar is found in the northeastern rainforest, with seven species native to the SAVA Region and the Makira--Masoala Landscape ( Barrett et al. 2010). There, the protected areas are at high risk of logging from a lack of law enforcement, and the higher quality, size, and density per hectare of the rosewood ( Barrett et al. 2010, Schuurman 2009).

The Makira component of the Makira--Masoala Landscape (Makira Forest Protected Area) is the only place in Madagascar where Stigmatomma bolabola  has been found, in a collection effort encompassing more than 440 collection sites. Given that the health of the ecosystem is essential to protect S. bolabola  habitat, here we plead for more effective protection of Malagasy rosewood.

Distribution

Stigmatomma bolabola  was collected in two localities of the Makira Forest Protected Area, in rainforest and montane rainforest habitats in the humid forests ecoregion of Madagascar (at 600 m and 1100 m respectively; following the classification of Burgess et al. 2004; Fig. 34). Specimens were recorded from sifted leaf mold and rotten wood.