Eustigmaeus extremiorientalis, Khaustov, 2016
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1051/acarologia/20162249 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5474953 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/474687CD-FFC1-FF88-7593-FDFA2D5BEA43 |
treatment provided by |
Marcus |
scientific name |
Eustigmaeus extremiorientalis |
status |
sp. nov. |
Eustigmaeus extremiorientalis n. sp.
( Figures 1-6 View FIGURE View FIGURE View FIGURE View FIGURE View FIGURE View FIGURE )
Description Female ( Figures 1-6 View FIGURE View FIGURE View FIGURE View FIGURE View FIGURE View FIGURE ) — Idiosoma almost round in outline. Length of idiosoma 340 (320 – 340), width 270 (270 – 280).
Idiosomal dorsum ( Figures 1A View FIGURE , 5A, B View FIGURE , 6A, B View FIGURE ) — Idiosoma completely covered by 2 large and well sclerotized plates. Plates with large round dimples ( Figures 1A View FIGURE , 5A View FIGURE , 6B View FIGURE ) and weak subcuticular reticulation. Dorsal setae situated on short protuberances, subequal, widened distally and strongly barbed ( Figures 5A, B View FIGURE ). Setae e 2 absent. Setae h 1 and h 2 situated ventrally. Setae h 2 only slightly thickened, not widened distally and weakly barbed. Lengths of dorsal setae: vi 42 (40 – 43), ve 50 (48 – 51), sci 38 (37 – 40), sce 31 (30 – 33), c 1 40 (39 – 41), c 2 28 (27 – 29), d 1 41 (40 – 43), d 2 35 (34 – 36), e 1 43 (42 – 44), f 1 46 (43 – 46), h 1 33 (31 – 34), h 2 19 (17 – 20).
Idiosomal venter ( Figures 1B View FIGURE , 5C View FIGURE , 6C, D View FIGURE ) — With 2 pairs of callosities between idiosomal plate and humeral plate. Anterior callosity slightly larger than posterior one ( Figure 5C View FIGURE ). Suranal plate situated ventrally, with distinct large dimples. Endopodal plates separated medially distinctly reticulated. Humeral plate subtriangular, with distinct large dimples. Most of ventral setae weakly barbed; with 2 pairs of simple subequal aggenital, and 3 pairs of simple pseudanal setae; setae ps 2 clearly shorter than subequal ps 1 and ps 3. Lengths of ventral setae: 1 a 23 (21 – 24), 1 b 22 (20 – 23), 1 c 16 (15 – 19), 2 b 16 (15 – 18), 2 c 17 (14 – 17), 3 a 20 (18 – 22), 3 b 16 (13 – 17), 3 c 16 (13 – 17), 4 a 19 (17 – 20), 4 b 17 (16 – 18), 4 c 15 (13 – 16), ag 1 16 (15 – 17), ag 2 18 (16 – 19), ps 1 14 (14 – 16), ps 2 11 (10 – 11), ps 3 16 (15 – 17).
Gnathosoma ( Figures 2 View FIGURE , 5B, D View FIGURE , 6E, F View FIGURE ) — Tibial claw well-developed. Setae l’ on palpal tibia very short, spine-like ( Figure 2B View FIGURE ). Setae d and l’ of palpal femur widened distally and strongly barbed; other palpal setae of femur, genu and tibia (except l’Ti) pointed and barbed; seta va of palp-tarsus weakly barbed; other setae of palp-tarsus smooth. Number of setae on palpal segments: Tr 0, Fe 3 (d, l’, v"), Ge 2 (d, l"), Ti 3 (d, l’, l"), Ta 8(1) (fused eupathidia ul’, ul", sul, eupathidion acm, ba, bp, lp, 1 solenidion ω). Palpal supracoxal setae (ep) needlelike. Rostrum of subcapitulum ( Figure 2C View FIGURE ) short and wide. Subcapitular setae or 1 smooth, distinctly thickened, curved and blunt-ended; other subcapitular setae simple, pointed. Basal part of subcapitulum with numerous small dimples and weak subcuticular reticulation ( Figure 5D View FIGURE ). Length of subcapitular setae: m 19 (18 – 22), n 18 (17 – 21), or 1 12 (11 – 12), or 2 12 (11 – 12). Chelicerae dorsally with numerous small dimples ( Figure 5B View FIGURE ).
Legs ( Figures 3 View FIGURE , 4 View FIGURE ) — Empodial raylets capitate. Leg I ( Figure 3A View FIGURE ). Coxae I posterodorsally with needle-like leg supracoxal setae (el). Leg setation: Tr 1 (v’), Fe 6 (d, l’, l", v’, v", bv"), Ge 4 (d, l’, l", k), Ti 5(2) (d, l’, l", v’, v", Φ, Φp), T a 13(1) (p’, p", tc’, tc", ft’, ft", u’, u", a’, a", pl’, pl", vs, ω). Setae (p) and (tc) of tarsus are eupathidia. Setae d, l’, l" of tibia, l’, l", d of genu, l" and d of femur distinctly thickened distally and strongly barbed, situated on protuberances. Seta k 8 (8 – 9). Solenidion ω short 15 (13 – 15), finger-shaped; solenidia Φ 8 (8 – 9) and Φp 11 (10 – 11) baculiform. Setae (ft), (pl) and vs of tarsus weakly barbed; (a), (u) smooth. Leg II ( Figure 3B View FIGURE ). Leg setation: Tr 1 (v’), Fe 5 (d, l’, l", v’, bv"), Ge 4 (d, l’, l", k), Ti 5(1) (d, l’, l", v’, v", Φ), Ta 9(1) (p’, tc’, tc", u’, u", a’, a", pl’, vs, ω). Setae p’ and tc’ of tarsus represented by eupathidia. Setae d, l’ and l" of tibia, d, l’ and l" of genu, d and l" of femur distinctly thickened distally and strongly barbed, situated on protuberances. Solenidion ω 9 (9 – 10) finger-shaped; solenidion Φp 7 (7 – 8) baculiform. Seta k 6 (5 – 6). Setae tc" and vs of tarsus weakly barbed; (a), (u) and pl’ of tarsus smooth. Leg III ( Figure 4A View FIGURE ). Leg setation: Tr 1 (v’), Fe 3 (d, l’, ev’), Ge 1 (d), Ti 5(1) (d, l’, l", v’, v", Φ), Ta 7(1) (tc’, tc", u’, u", a’, a", vs, ω). Solenidion ω 5 (4 – 5) baculiform; solenidion Φp 6 (5 – 6) baculiform. Setae d, l’ of tibia, d of genu, d and l’ of femur distinctly thickened distally and strongly barbed, situated on protuberances. Setae (u) of tarsus smooth, other tarsal setae weakly barbed. Leg IV ( Figure 4B View FIGURE ). Leg setation: Tr 1 (v’), Fe 2 (d, ev’), Ge 1 (d), Ti 5(1) (d, l’, l", v’, v", Φ), Ta 7(1) (tc’, tc", u’, u", a’, a", vs, ω). Solenidion ω 4 (4 – 5) baculiform; solenidion Φp 6 (5 – 6) baculiform. Setae d, l’, l" of tibia, d of genu and femur distinctly thickened distally and strongly barbed, situated on protuberances. Setae (u) of tarsus smooth, other tarsal setae weakly barbed.
Male and immatures: unknown.
Type material — Female holotype, slide No ST181215, Russia: Primorskiy kray, Vladivostok , Botanical Garden-Institute , Far Eastern Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences , 43°13’26.3"N, 131°59’34.6"E, from mosses on log, 18 December 2015, coll. S. Tupitsyn. Paratypes: 17 females, same data as holotype GoogleMaps .
Etymology — The new species name refers to its distribution in the Far East of Russia.
Differential diagnosis — The new species is most similar to E. absens Do ˘gan, 2005, described from Turkey (Do ˘gan 2005), by the absence of setae e 2, presence of two callosities, only one seta on trochanter III and two pairs of aggenital setae. The new species differs from E. absens by distinctly thickened distally and strongly barbed dorsal idiosomal setae (vs. baculiform and weakly barbed in E. absens ) and by setae sci longer than sce (vs. sci about two times shorter than sce in E. absens ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |