Palaeocorystoidea
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3215.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B20CD4A6-D150-4CCF-931F-ED6D7EA54E8C |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/4601C935-FF33-F9CF-5BB4-FD94F60BFB2B |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Palaeocorystoidea |
status |
|
Palaeocorystoidea versus Glaessneropsoidea Patrulius, 1959
This comparison considers Glaessneropsoidea sensu Schweitzer & Feldmann (2009, 2010b–c) and Schweitzer et al. (2010). This assemblage comprises five families: Glaessneropsidae Patrulius, 1959 , Lecythocaridae Schweitzer & Feldmann, 2009 , Longodromitidae Schweitzer & Feldmann, 2009 , Nodoprosopidae Schweitzer & Feldmann, 2009 , and Konidromitidae Schweitzer & Feldmann, 2010c . Only carapace material is so far known, and both the composition and diagnosis of the superfamily (Schweitzer & Feldmann 2009: 82) are far from stable at the moment, exemplified by the various rigorous changes recently proposed by Karasawa et al. (2011); additional studies are needed to elaborate its status.
Carapace.
‒ Carapace gently convex in transverse direction in Palaeocorystoidea (strongly convex in Glaessneropsoidea).
‒ Front as wide as or narrower than orbits in Palaeocorystoidea (much broader, more prominent in Glaessneropsoidea).
‒ Groove system shallow and subtle in Palaeocorystoidea (acute and prominent in Glaessneropsoidea).
‒ Cervical groove generally much more strongly incised in Glaessneropsoidea than in Palaeocorystoidea .
‒ Branchial groove weak, not notching the carapace margins in Palaeocorystoidea (always clearly defined, notching margins in Glaessneropsoidea).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.