Eremobothynus cornutus ( Steinheil, 1872 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.181374 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6231148 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/46000370-6D38-F215-FF73-411548F8F864 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Eremobothynus cornutus ( Steinheil, 1872 ) |
status |
|
Notes on Eremobothynus cornutus ( Steinheil, 1872)
This species was described by Steinheil (1872) based on a single male and was originally placed in the genus Scaptophilus Burmeister, 1847 , which was later synonymized with Bothynus Hope, 1837 . Ohaus (1910) described the genus Eremobothynus to accommodate this species. Ohaus (1910) also described the female of E. cornutus , and mentioned that the three males he studied had a more developed horn than the “female” he examined. It is very probable that he was actually describing a very small male and mistook it for a female.
During the course of our studies, we examined a large number of male and female specimens of E. cornutus from the second author’s collection. All females examined were completely unarmed, with no horns or tubercles on the head ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1 – 4 ). Therefore, all identification keys (e.g., Endrödi 1969, Endrödi 1985, Ratcliffe 1981, Ratcliffe & Hardy 2005) must be corrected to indicate that only males in E. cornutus have a frontal horn ( Fig. 3 View FIGURES 1 – 4 ), and that the pronotum is convex in females ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1 – 4 ) and not declivous as in males.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |