Bracon (Uncobracon) longwangshanensis, Li & He & Chen, 2020
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/dez.67.57668 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:41F77B2A-0E1C-4874-AE89-1E72B3DD6A32 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B0C365CE-0102-4D68-A3BA-CE08876A7C11 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:B0C365CE-0102-4D68-A3BA-CE08876A7C11 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Bracon (Uncobracon) longwangshanensis |
status |
sp. nov. |
Bracon (Uncobracon) longwangshanensis sp. nov. Figs 25 View Figure 25 , 26 View Figure 26
Type material.
Holotype. ♀, China, Zhejiang Prov., Anji, Mt. Longwang, 31.VIII.1993, Xu Zaifu, No. 9310129 ( ZJUH). Paratype. 1♀, China, Zhejiang Prov., Mt. Tianmu, 29.VII.1984, Qian Ying, No. 842895 ( ZJUH).
Diagnosis.
This new species is very similar to B. (U.) eurysulcatus sp. nov., but can be separated from the latter by the following characters: metasomal tergites largely blackish-brown, third to fifth tergites laterally and sixth tergite (except medio-basally) white yellow, seventh tergite yellowish-brown (largely blackish-brown, first and second tergites whitish-yellow, with black spots in B. (U.) eurysulcatus ); propodeum with medio-longitudinal groove and with medio-longitudinal carina posteriorly (only with complete medio-longitudinal carina); second tergite without medio-longitudinal carina (medio-longitudinal carina connected to medio-basal area of second tergite); in dorsal view, length of eye 2.2 × temple (2.6 times); hind femur 3.2 × longer than its maximum width (4.6 times).
Description.
Holotype, ♀, length of body 5.1 mm, of fore wing 4.9 mm, of ovipositor sheath 3.0 mm.
Head. Antenna with 35 segments; apical antennal segment strongly acute, 2.7 × longer than its maximum width (Fig. 26l View Figure 26 ); first flagellomere 2.1 × longer than wide, 1.2 and 1.3 × longer than second and third, respectively, the latter being 1.8 × longer than wide; malar suture rather weak, with some short setae; clypeus height: inter-tentorial distance: tentorio-ocular distance = 3: 8: 4; clypeus sparsely short setose; eye nearly not emarginate (Fig. 26g View Figure 26 ); face weakly granulate and with dense short setae laterally (Fig. 26g View Figure 26 ); eye height: shortest distance between eyes: head width = 17: 15: 31; frons weakly granulate, weakly concave behind antennal sockets, with a indistinct median groove and sparsely short setose laterally (Fig. 26h View Figure 26 ); vertex largely smooth, with sparse short setae; shortest distance between posterior ocelli: minimum diameter of elliptical posterior ocellus: shortest distance between posterior ocellus and eye = 3: 3: 5; temples linearly narrowed behind eyes (Fig. 26h View Figure 26 ).
Mesosoma. Length of mesosoma 1.6 × its height (Fig. 26c View Figure 26 ); notauli complete and deeply impressed (Fig. 26d View Figure 26 ); mesoscutum weakly punctate, with relatively dense short setae along notaulic courses (Fig. 26d View Figure 26 ); scutellar sulcus deep, wide, with four sparse strong crenulae (Fig. 26d View Figure 26 ); scutellum smooth, with dense short setae posteriorly; metanotum moderately convex medially, with a short carina anteriorly (Fig. 26d View Figure 26 ); propodeum largely smooth except for weakly rugose medially, with a strong medio-longitudinal groove and with a short medio-longitudinal carina posteriorly and with dense long setae laterally (Fig. 26d View Figure 26 ).
Wings. Fore wing (Fig. 26a View Figure 26 ): SR1: 3-SR: r = 35: 22: 7; 1-SR+M more or less straight, 1.2 × longer than 1-M; 2-SR: 3-SR: r-m = 6: 11: 4; m-cu straight, 1.2 × longer than 2-SR+M; angle between 1-SR and C+SC+R about 75°; cu-a interstitial. Hind wing (Fig. 26b View Figure 26 ): SC+R1: 2-SC+R: 1r-m = 8: 2: 5.
Legs. Length of fore femur: tibia: tarsus = 22: 24: 31; length of hind femur: tibia: basitarsus = 29: 42: 14; length of femur, tibia and basitarsus of hind leg 3.2, 7.6 and 5.6 × their maximum width, respectively; hind tibial spurs 0.5 and 0.6 × as long as hind basitarsus.
Metasoma. First tergite as long as its apical width; first tergite concave medio-basally, median area convex and strongly sculptured posteriorly, without medio-longitudinal carina (Fig. 26k View Figure 26 ); lateral grooves of first tergite moderately wide, with sparse crenulae (Fig. 26k View Figure 26 ); second tergite coarsely sculptured, with a small and rugose triangular medio-basal area, without medio-longitudinal carina (Fig. 26e View Figure 26 ); second metasomal suture wide, deep, with strong crenulae, weakly curved medially (Fig. 26e View Figure 26 ); third tergite with fine antero-lateral grooves; third to sixth tergites with subposterior transverse grooves (but absent medially on third tergite); third to fifth tergites coarsely sculptured (Fig. 26e View Figure 26 ); sixth and seventh tergites weakly rugose, posteriorly smooth (Fig. 26e View Figure 26 ); ovipositor sheath 0.6 × as long as fore wing.
Colour. Head and mesosoma largely pale reddish-yellow (Fig. 25 View Figure 25 ); antenna (but inner side of scapus yellow), eyes, mandible apically, metanotum and propodeum (but laterally reddish-yellow) black (Fig. 26d, g View Figure 26 ); fore leg yellow (but claws black), middle (except for trochanter and femur yellow) and hind leg black (Figs 25 View Figure 25 , 26f View Figure 26 ); metasoma largely black, second to fifth metasomal tergites laterally and sixth tergite (but medio-basally black) whitish-yellow, seventh tergite yellowish-brown (Fig. 26e, k View Figure 26 ); ovipositor sheath black (Fig. 25 View Figure 25 ); wing membrane pale fruscate, pterostigma and veins dark brown (Fig. 26a, b View Figure 26 ).
Variation. Length of body of female 5.0-5.1 mm, of fore wing of female 4.7-4.9 mm and of ovipositor sheath 2.7-3.0 mm; mesopleuron posteriorly and metapleuron black; middle femur black; whitish-yellow area of second to fifth metasomal tergites relatively larger in paratypes.
Biology.
Unknown.
Distribution.
China (Zhejiang).
Etymology.
Named after the type locality, Longwangshan, Zhejiang Province.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |