Putaoa Hormiga and Tu, 2008
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4341.1.8 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B30253F6-530D-4A7D-9F8A-8D6C1B862228 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6051997 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/442F87E8-FFCC-FFEE-E1AB-FEAEE665FCB4 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Putaoa Hormiga and Tu, 2008 |
status |
|
Type species: Putaoa huaping Hormiga and Tu, 2008
Revised Diagnosis. Males of Putaoa species differ from other pimoids in having distinctively large macrosetae on the pedipalpal tibia and/or cymbium ( Figs. 2A, B, E, F View FIGURE 2 ) and by the absence of typical cuspules, such as those found in Pimoa ( Hormiga 1994: figs. 68–70) and Weintrauboa ( Hormiga 2003: figs. 5E, 6D). In addition, Putaoa species lack a median apophysis and have a relatively short and non-filiform embolus ( Figs. 1B View FIGURE 1 , 2D View FIGURE 2 ); the embolus is filiform in many Pimoa ( Hormiga 1994: figs. 86, 102) and Weintrauboa species (Hormiga 2008: figs. 2, 3). In Putaoa the metatarsus I is unmodified, while sinuous in the males of most Weintrauboa species ( Hormiga 2003: figs. 3G–J). Females are diagnosed by their relatively flat epigynum with lateral openings, relatively short copulatory ducts and medial fertilization ducts (the female of P. megacantha remains undescribed).
Phylogenetics. Hormiga & Tu (2008) hypothesized that the monophyly of Putaoa is supported by four unambiguous synapomorphies: large and long macrosetae on cymbium and on male pedipalpal tibiae, absence of a median apophysis and a relatively short, non-filiform embolus. The new species of Putaoa shares all these apomorphies.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.