Monomachus ruficeps Brullé, 1846
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5391305 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5467755 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/42739559-892E-FFBD-A78F-FECEFBF2FB05 |
treatment provided by |
Marcus |
scientific name |
Monomachus ruficeps Brullé, 1846 |
status |
|
Monomachus ruficeps Brullé, 1846
Monomachus ruficeps Brullé, 1846: 535 .
CURRENT STATUS. — Monomachus fuscator (Perty, 1833) .
LECTOTYPE (designated by Schulz 1911). — Brazil, São Paulo province, north of São Paulo, ♀ ( MNHN).
LABELS. — Muséum Paris/ Nord Capit’e/ de St Paul; Monomachus / ruficeps Br. ; Du Nord/ de la capit/ de St Paul; type; Holotype / Monomachus ruficeps / Brullé, fide Musetti & Johnson 2000 [lectotype ♀].
REMARKS
There is no conclusive evidence that the original description was based on a single specimen, and so there is not a holotype. Schulz (1911) may be considered to have designated a lectotype ( ICZN 1999: Art. 74.5) when he wrote: “Nach Ansicht des typischen ♀ von ruficeps Brullé im Museum Paris” [= From an examination of the typical female of ruficeps Brullé in Paris Museum]. The lectotype is pinned, and slightly mouldy, with the left flagellum missing after the first segment, the right flagellum missing after the third segment, the right fore wing and both hind wings a little broken, and the apex of the left mid tarsus missing. The synonymy established by Schulz (1904), and recently confirmed by Musetti & Johnson (2004), is followed here.
MNHN |
Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Monomachus ruficeps Brullé, 1846
Notton, David G. 2007 |
Monomachus ruficeps Brullé, 1846: 535
BRULLE A. 1846: 535 |